Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Damon Van Dam Testifies Tearfully, Fends Off Lifestyle Attack:Day 3 of Westerfield Trial
CourtTV ^ | June 6, 2002 | CourtTV

Posted on 06/05/2002 11:36:24 PM PDT by FresnoDA

DAY 3: Westerfield On Trial



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 861-876 next last
To: sbnsd; spectre
Oh, no, say out of this part of it, sbnsd. Because you don't know what's been going on in freepmail -- which I did exactly because I didn't want us to get into this type of situation publicly (though I'm kinda having fun now!). Spectre has exactly the technique I've described and if it didn't happen with Bunny, it most definitely did with me -- on more than one occasion. There's a 3rd party here that knows it too, but I'm not dragging them into my fight.

Oh, and if you haven't heard, I'm on prozac, that's what spectre was referring to, not an idle joke at my expense. I know that in spectre's eyes and undoubtedly others that makes me weak, or my opinions suspect, or other bad things. But that's ok. People who think that way are not people I wish to associate with anyway.

681 posted on 06/06/2002 5:37:58 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
But that is an about face from her reaction at the PH. What's up with that?

What was your observation of BvD,dDvD PH?

682 posted on 06/06/2002 5:38:23 PM PDT by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
All innocent mistakes, accusations fly, and people are mad at each other. Go back and read the posts; they're all there.

I have acknowledged here (and I thought I had in the other thread) that I had misread spectre's post. I misunderstood and no one is disputing that. Did South Flank misunderstand or was she attacking?

683 posted on 06/06/2002 5:38:28 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
yeah, sorry, Bunny, I wanted to show that I was supporting you. LIke you would have missed it if I hadn't pinged you! This is fun.
684 posted on 06/06/2002 5:39:52 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I'm really tired of all the fighting...It's time for me to take a time-out. sw

But wait a second, you didn't formally accept my apology. =:->

685 posted on 06/06/2002 5:40:07 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Good synopsis, and better than I did when trying to explain in freepmail! Thank you.
686 posted on 06/06/2002 5:40:20 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: spectre

Hello....

Notice that Flamin' Frez is trying to divert the elevated tempers by insisting upon both a GROUP HUG and a GROUP SING-A-LONG!!!

Swing low, sweet char-iot....coming for to carry me hommmmeeee!!!

SING VAN DAMN IT!!! SING!!!!!

IF YOU GUYS DON'T COOL IT....

This Thread is going to be vaporized into cyber-oblivion.....and I am on the road, and have not had the chance to archive yet....

Miz....please backup this thread, ASAP!!!

FresnoDA

 

687 posted on 06/06/2002 5:42:47 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I have acknowledged here (and I thought I had in the other thread) that I had misread spectre's post. I misunderstood and no one is disputing that. Did South Flank misunderstand or was she attacking?

I was just told to stay out of it. Apparently, there's history here between posters. I've been a lurker, but very new to posting. I'm on no one's side. I just read 'em and try to stay neutral. I don't even know how to use freepmail; so, I guess I really don't know what's going on.

I just didn't want to see everyone fight over misunderstandings and accusations when we all have at least one common interest. That's what we should be discussing.
688 posted on 06/06/2002 5:44:48 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA;all
How about if everyone tales a break the rest of the night and let's all go out dancing for a bit of relaxation.
689 posted on 06/06/2002 5:45:55 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
I was just told to stay out of it. Apparently, there's history here between posters. I've been a lurker, but very new to posting. I'm on no one's side.

Except your previous post was about my admitted misunderstanding about spectre's post. It might have been nice had you weighed in, not only on my shortcomings, but those who become vicious when someone has an opposing opinion.

690 posted on 06/06/2002 5:48:10 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: Amore
Oh no you don't. I give in to my time-out.

YOU e-mailed me because your nose got out of joint about a remark I made about attorneys...never mentioned your name, Amore. YOU are way too paranoid. Way too paranoid..get it?

It was YOU who was on another thread talking about you being on Medications and how anti-depressants are sooooo wonderful, did you not? So what's the big deal?

Oh, I never got on that thread, and I don't think people who take them are weak or else I wouldn't have just popped one of them, myself. Guess I'm weak.

YOU have a problem with me. You demand politeness and respect. Yes, DEMAND. Well, you got to earn it, kiddo. And you haven't..at least not from me. Get off my back. Don't post to me again. Treat me like I don't exist. Do me a that courtest, please.

sw

691 posted on 06/06/2002 5:49:58 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: let freedom sing
Brenda's "Hi Dave" remark from the PH. She was reported to appear hostile to the accused. That's the big about face. Not to make excuses for her or anything, but I think that for her it's truly a walk through H*ll. She knows what she did whether or not she admits it, but she doesn't know what some others did that night. You know what I mean. I don't think Brenda was involved in Danielle's death but there are some others who deserved more scrutiny. Remember DW is not the only one who, to this point appears to be their own alibi.
692 posted on 06/06/2002 5:50:03 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Is that the best you can do after claiming I offended throughout the thread? It says volumes.

Obviously the reason you avoided the "context" I asked for is because that post of mine was a reply to your excoriation.

Thanks for the reply though. You proved my point very well.

Since you seem to leap before reading, alisasny asked me only once and I complied. Please fact check first.

693 posted on 06/06/2002 5:51:08 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Except your previous post was about my admitted misunderstanding about spectre's post. It might have been nice had you weighed in, not only on my shortcomings, but those who become vicious when someone has an opposing opinion.

I don't think it was a shortcoming. You misunderstood because of whatever reason: not enough previous context; you were expecting a certain response; you and spectre have previous history; I don't know. It's not a crime to misunderstand. And then, I think everyone became vicious. That's why I had hoped it'd stop.
694 posted on 06/06/2002 5:53:38 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I realize that you see yourself on some plateau above the fray, but save it. I'm not impressed and I doubt that a lot of others are either.

When someone spends so much time tooting her own horn, I figure it's because she's desperate for someone.....anyone to hear the tune.

695 posted on 06/06/2002 5:54:09 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Whoops..."do me that courtesy, please"..sw
696 posted on 06/06/2002 5:55:02 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Can't take the heat or the light of day, eh? Nice tactic post things to me ostensibly directed to another poster but then when I finally give up and start addressing you directly (which I've tried to avoid because you are so consistently, snidely unpleasant), now you say I CAN'T address you directly? Fine, that will be my last post to you for now because right now I don't want to get banned. But I ain't saying I'll never do it. In fact, it would be a great way to leave this place. I'm sure your opinions and expertise will be much more valued here than mine could ever be. Hope everyone's happy with the trade-off!
697 posted on 06/06/2002 5:57:27 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
I understand your #692 post, but the other people must have alibis
698 posted on 06/06/2002 6:02:18 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7;Mrs.Liberty
Bartender says BVD was not drunk, as she was "aware" of what of going on around her.(Mrs Liberty)

In the field we call that tolerance...what would knock us off our feet leaves others walking ok...The lady is no lady she has a hollow leg (RNmomo #605)

It's no wonder. If he admitted he broke the law and gave alcool to a drunk he would never work behind a bar in CA again. Not to mention fines.

IMHO, he's just covering his behind.

699 posted on 06/06/2002 6:02:48 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Is that the best you can do after claiming I offended throughout the thread? It says volumes.

You did tonight as you did last night. Claim someone is ignorant because they disagree with you. You did this to me because I disagreed about Westerfield's familiarity about the house. Yoiu can'r disagree, you attack.

Will you at least admit you're not the authority on this case?

700 posted on 06/06/2002 6:02:56 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 861-876 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson