The War on Islamists is like saying The War on Nazis or The War on Communists ... it is correct, but it sounds dumb because it trivializes the war by personalizing it. Islamists are people, the ones carrying on Jihad.
Jihad has one meaning: military and violent conquest of the infidels.
That's incorrect; for many Muslims, at least, it means a spiritual struggle. Well, supposedly, anyhow.
ji·had also je·had (j-häd) n.
|
\Ji*had"\, Jehad \Je*had"\, n. [Ar. jih[=a]d.] (Moham.) A religious war against infidels or Mohammedan heretics; also, any bitter war or crusade for a principle or belief.
[Their] courage in war . . . had not, like that of the Mohammedan dervishes of the Sudan, or of Mohammedans anywhere engaged in a jehad, a religious motive and the promise of future bliss behind it. --James Bryce.
jihad n : a holy war by Muslims against unbelievers [syn: jehad]
This is a great step, someone in major media starting to define the enemy. Clearly once we do this we can then determine how to defeat them. We better hope like crazy they dont get nukes, because if they do, this war changes in a hurry.
No, that's not right. Of course, you get different meanings for "jihad" depending on who you ask...but that makes the point.
Most informed individuals understand "jihad" to mean "struggle".
I agree with the other poster and Dobbs. "Islamists" are exactly what we are up against. "Jihad" is ambiguous.
While "Islamist" may not be adequately pc, it's spot on.