Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PC Superstition on Campus
http://www.pacificresearch.org/ ^ | June 7, 2002 | by Sally C. Pipes

Posted on 06/13/2002 4:57:03 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

PC Superstition on Campus

by Sally C. Pipes

The careers of Margaret Thatcher, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, and Benazir Bhutto do not reveal any deficiency in women’s ability to recognize facts and understand the real world. But those who teach something called “women’s studies” seem to have some problems in these basic areas.

Unknown before the 1970s, there are now about 900 women’s studies programs in universities across the country, including 15 doctoral programs. But according to a study of the most commonly used textbooks, the course materials in these programs bear little resemblance to scholarship.

One text teaches that science and medicine are the outgrowth of a “male culture,” something that would have surprised Madame Curie, who is the only two-time Nobel laureate. Likewise the notion that women should be leery of new medical breakthroughs, a staple of women’s studies texts, would have surprised former surgeon general Joycelyn Elders. The texts also charge that women are shortchanged in medical research, which is untrue. As it happens, women are 60 percent of all subjects in clinical trials funded by the National Institutes of Health, and since 1985, more money has been spent on breast cancer research than on any other cancer research.

In another text, women are told that they are slaves. That would certainly surprise Oprah Winfrey, one of the wealthiest women in America, who does pretty much as she pleases. Carly Fiorina, chairman and CEO of Hewlett-Packard, and the countless women starting their own businesses, would also find it strange. But according to the women’s studies texts, women are not even aware of their servitude. Apparently only professors of women’s studies have the ability to see such things.

Women now earn the majority of bachelor’s and master’s degrees, but women’s studies professors maintain that academia itself is simply another tool of male oppression. This should come as no surprise since the premise behind women’s studies is that truth is simply a social construct that reflects male domination, patriarchy, and “phallocentric” society. “No purely factual studies exist,” says one of the major women’s studies texts.

Many studies show that people who are married tend to do better financially. But not a single chapter in any major women’s studies textbook describes marriage as a good thing. In fact, marriage emerges as a major cause of mental illness in women. Men, of course, do not fare well in women’s studies material. One text portrays fathers as a “foreign male element” in the home. If men have any role at all, it is to unintentionally elicit feminist impulses in their daughters.

The women’s studies texts continue to maintain that women are paid less than men for the same work, and they continue to hold up I Rigoberta Menchu long after this work was exposed as a fraud. In every case, contrary evidence is ignored, which defies true scholarship. The full story on women’s studies can be found in Lying in a Bed of One’s Own: How Women’s Studies Miseducates Students, recently published by the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF). That women’s studies types have blasted this study as “right-wing propaganda” should serve only to confirm its accuracy.

Suffice it to say that the field of women’s studies is not genuine scholarship, but rather an axis of feminist superstition, a victim mentality, and anti-male demonology. But even with their distaste for facts and grudge against reality, women’s studies departments are, of course, politically correct on campus. That’s why they won’t disappear any time soon, though by all scholarly standards, and common sense, they should. Students who are required to take these courses should avail themselves of the IWF study.

Women are doing quite well in American society, with the trends all upward. They can further empower themselves by ignoring this bogus nondiscipline and instead pursuing degrees in engineering, business, medicine, or the law.


Sally Pipes is the President and CEO of the Pacific Research Institute, a California-based think tank. She can be reached via email at spipes@pacificresearch.org.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academialist

1 posted on 06/13/2002 4:57:03 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Academia list
*Index Bump
2 posted on 06/13/2002 4:59:23 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: PA COPPERHEAD
I can understand that... Around here, I tell the kids "Your mommy wears combat boots..." and it's not a joke ;0)
4 posted on 06/13/2002 5:14:36 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: all
Please excuse this short interruption. As you know, the fundraiser is in full swing. We need your help. Please stop by the fundraising thread and give it a bump. And if you have a few bucks, we'd really appreciate a contribution to keep this site running. IMO, it's the best site on the internet for news and analysis.
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Thank you for your support!
5 posted on 06/13/2002 5:34:42 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
"bogus nondiscipline" - couldn't have expressed it any better.
6 posted on 06/13/2002 5:50:51 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The movie "PCU" was soooo ahead of its time!
7 posted on 06/13/2002 5:55:53 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The field of women's studies is very broad.
8 posted on 06/13/2002 7:28:00 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Thank you Registered!

9 posted on 06/13/2002 7:30:09 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
My favorite part was when meat was being thrown down onto the vegetarian/animals are human protesters. Reminded me of when Dorothy threw water on the Wicked Witch of the West.
10 posted on 06/13/2002 7:31:39 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Broads' nonsense dressed up as scholarly inquiry. This is one ugly sow that ain't gonna fly even if she's smeared with glossy lipstick.
11 posted on 06/13/2002 7:34:03 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
In wartime, our financial resources are wasted on such non-essentials; and for that matter, all of the university "systems" across this land, should be examined for their worth ... because we will face lean times, and no money for Clintonism.
12 posted on 06/13/2002 7:40:01 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Here's the opposite view of another liberal feminist, Camille Paglia:
"White middle-class girls at the elite colleges and universities seem to want the world handed to them on a platter. They have been sheltered, coddled, and flattered. Having taught at a wide variety of institutions over my ill-starred career, I have observed that working-class or lower-middle-class girls, who are from financially struggling families and who must take a patchwork of menial off-campus jobs to stay in school, are usually the least hospitable to feminist rhetoric. They see life as it is and have fewer illusions about sex. It is affluent, upper-middle class students who most spout the party line - as if the grisly hyperemotionalism of feminist jargon satisfies their hunger for meaningful experience outside their eventless upbringing. In the absence of war, invent one. (Vamps & Tramps, p. 28)

"Feminist confidence that the whole human race can be "reeducated" to totally eliminate the possibility of rape is pure folly...Wave after wave of boys hit puberty every year. Do feminists, with their multicultural pretensions, really envision a massive export of white bourgeois good manners all around the world? Speak of imperialism!"(Vamps & Tramps, p. 33.)

13 posted on 06/13/2002 7:46:17 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
working-class or lower-middle-class girls, who are from financially struggling families and who must take a patchwork of menial off-campus jobs to stay in school, are usually the least hospitable to feminist rhetoric

Hey! I resemble that remark! Oh, but nevermind, I fell into the trap and majored in mathematics. My bad.

14 posted on 06/13/2002 8:15:58 PM PDT by dagny taggert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
bump
15 posted on 06/14/2002 7:40:07 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson