Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Run Sierra Club's Sleazy Ads
Detroit News ^ | 6/17/02 | Not attributed

Posted on 06/17/2002 8:50:59 AM PDT by jimkress

Edited on 05/25/2004 3:03:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Some local radio stations are refusing to air commercials from the Sierra Club that attempt to paint Detroit auto workers and Chairman Bill Ford Jr. as treasonous for building the light trucks and sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) that Americans love to drive.


(Excerpt) Read more at detroitnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environazis; environment; oil; suv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The stations should go ahead and run the ads, so the Sierra Club can get a taste of how Michigan workers feel about being called traitors.

Works for ME!

1 posted on 06/17/2002 8:50:59 AM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimkress
Yup. Sierra Club allegedly gets money from the Saudis and foreign oil concerns. They're the traitors IMHO.
2 posted on 06/17/2002 8:54:09 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
I bet 60 - 85% of the money donated to the Sierra Club comes from SUV drivers
3 posted on 06/17/2002 9:40:26 AM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
"The commercials expose the Sierra Club's real purpose -- they hate cars, and they hate American industry."

Sierra Club mission statement, in a nutshell.
Or should that be "...in a nutcase?"

4 posted on 06/17/2002 10:00:24 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
If anyone is concerned about using Arab oil, why not promote more drilling in Alaska? So much untouched land just waiting for us....
5 posted on 06/17/2002 10:10:56 AM PDT by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sally II
I know that this is a conservative website, but I don't understand how we all got so polarized over this issue. It seems to me that there is a perfectly good compromise that could make both sides happy. Maybe a gov't fund could be set up (paid for by a voluntary contribution on one's income taxes) that gives money to the American auto companies to build hybrid or electric SUV's. I don't know any one who actually think an electric car is “bad”, I just think that everyone is so upset over each other's rhetoric that no one is willing to compromise one inch. To me this is a non-issue: Liberals - shut up and let the oil companies buy oil from the regular places - the world is not going to blow up if we continue using oil until it's logical to stop using it. Conservatives - get with the 21st century and endorse the research into the perfection of alternative fuels - it won't make cars smaller or take away jobs - in fact it may create a new industry in the US that could rival the computer revolution. I believe that in 20 years all cars and SUV's will be hybrid or electric anyway, and oil use will go down naturally from this technological advance. Each side should just get over it and let the eventual progression toward alternative energies resolve the issue naturally.
6 posted on 06/17/2002 10:30:50 AM PDT by turtlegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
The Sierra Club is, in this one instance, correct. It is a national scandal that Americans will not stop pouring money down the oil hole. However, it is instructive to note that they will only tell the hard truths about the collaboration of working class men and women with the terrorists--collaboration over which these men and women have very little control. They do not set national policy or goals.

They will studiously avoid the troubling subject of the oil oligarchy's financial sponsorship of much of the Big Environmental movement.

Big Business, Big Environment and Big Government---the un-Holy Trinity of the status quo.

Nor will the Sierra Club take on the immigration issue even though they claim that human expansion is one of the greatest threats to the environment. This is because their sponsors---Big Business--support mass immigration and the general lowering of wages that accompanies mass immigration. So, naturally they go after auto workers. It's much easier to poop on the head of the low man on the totem pole, after all......

7 posted on 06/17/2002 10:32:25 AM PDT by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Sierra Club allegedly gets money from the Saudis and foreign oil concerns.

Do you have any proof of those allegations?
8 posted on 06/17/2002 10:38:51 AM PDT by newcats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: turtlegirl
Back in the Seventies they were preaching the same Sh!T. We'll all be in electric cars by the turn of the Century. And we would be close to running out of Oil and gas.

Hmm looks like they didn't know what they were talking about back then either.

9 posted on 06/17/2002 11:06:54 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ghost of nixon
I bet 60 - 85% of the money donated to the Sierra Club comes from SUV drivers

I bet 60-85% of the people working for the Sierra Club are SUV drivers. They are nothing but hypocrites.

10 posted on 06/17/2002 11:56:38 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
Sierra Club that attempt to paint Detroit auto workers and Chairman Bill Ford Jr. as
treasonous for building the light trucks and sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) that Americans love to drive.


The folks at The Sierra Club have simply gone insane.
Bill Ford Jr. is as "green" as they get in the automotive industry
(aside from the guys who put together the hybrids for Toyota and Honda).
Bill Ford Jr. has come under heavy flack from some of his fellow board members for
being to enviro-conscious.

Napoleon had a phrase for this sort of moment (roughly): "When your enemy is busy destroying
himself, stand back and do nothing".
11 posted on 06/17/2002 12:08:21 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I've been emailing O'reilly about club Sierra and some of their counterparts...he's on this non-profit binge, I hope he checks these enviro/lawyer groups out. radiofactor.com and oreilly@foxnews.com
12 posted on 06/17/2002 12:12:23 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: turtlegirl
Liberals - shut up and let the oil companies buy oil from the regular places - the world is not going to blow up if we continue using oil until it's logical to stop using it.

Agreed.

Conservatives - get with the 21st century and endorse the research into the perfection of alternative fuels - it won't make cars smaller or take away jobs - in fact it may create a new industry in the US that could rival the computer revolution. I believe that in 20 years all cars and SUV's will be hybrid or electric anyway, and oil use will go down naturally from this technological advance.

I don't know of anyone who opposes the research and perfection of alternative fuels. The automotive industy by nature needs to sell the consumer what it wants. As the science improves and the automakers are able to supply an electric or alternative fuel vehicle that fits the consumers performance and utility needs at a reasonable price, they will sell a bunch. Until those needs are met, the consumers will stay away in droves as they do now. When those needs are met, the consumers will flock to the dealers to purchase them no matter what the fuel source is.

If an automaker could offer me a 4 wheel drive electic/alternative fuel SUV that could seat 7 and pull a 10,000 lb. boat trailer for $25-$30K I'd buy one. Or if they offered a electric/alternative fuel 2 seater sports car that didn't look like a golf cart, would do 0-60 in under 6 seconds, and cost less than $25K I'd buy one of those. Or even a 4-5 seat family car that costs less than $25,000. But the fact of the matter is, they don't exist. And without govt. subsidies or incentives (i.e. taxpayer help), most are not within reach of the average American family. We don't buy them because they don't fit our needs or are within our budgets not because we are opposed to cleaner/non-emmission vehicles. As technology improves and prices come down, then Detroit will sell a load of these vehicles. Not because the gubmint inflicts disincentives on us to force us out of our current choices.

13 posted on 06/17/2002 12:50:44 PM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: turtlegirl
Electric cars need to get their juice from someplace too, be it a nuclear power plant or a coal burning power plant.

There does seem to be a limit on the size/weight vs. mpg/miles-per-recharge that keeps hybrids and electric cars small.

14 posted on 06/17/2002 12:51:03 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The Sierra Club and their infamous Legal Fund, supplied by many large US Trusts and liberal groups, are the worst threat to the environment anywhere! I hate 'em and all their ilk! Just watch their glee when thousands of acres of dead trees, killed by bark beetles in the West go up in smoke this summer, thanks to these two asinine groups. As far as SUVs are concerned, I read that the directors of the Club drive them. Idiots!
15 posted on 06/17/2002 1:17:43 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: weegee
There does seem to be a limit on the size/weight vs. mpg/miles-per-recharge that keeps hybrids and electric cars small.

There is no limit on the size of hybrids. All modern train locomotives are diesel-electic hybrids. The only reason the current mass-market hybrid cars (Toyota and Honda) are small is that they are aiming for maximum gas mileage.

16 posted on 06/17/2002 1:35:24 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
Or even a 4-5 seat family car that costs less than $25,000. But the fact of the matter is, they don't exist.

The do exist: Toyota Prius. With the hybrid powerplant, MPG is 52/45/48 city/highway/combined. MSRP $19.995. I own one and love it for my commute.

17 posted on 06/17/2002 1:41:41 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
Or even a 4-5 seat family car

It's fine for a family of 5 midgets. Until they come out with a Camry/Taurus sized one, it won't fit the needs of an average family for anymore than a trip to the grocery store permitting they only need a few things.

I don't doubt the value as a commuter car though, or even the Honda Insight. I, in fact, have a strange attraction to tiny cars. I love the old Austin Mini's, Mini Mokes, and King Midgets. Which is kind of funny given I'm 6'3" 260 lbs. I've got my eye on the new BMW Mini Coopers as well, but right now I own a Caravan, an F-350 Crew Cab, and an Escort Wagon for running errands with. With the wife, two car seats (and another car seat on its' way), anything Escort size or smaller just won't cut it for the average family. That's not to say it's not possible and the sacrifice isn't worth it for some families. But for most it's not.

18 posted on 06/18/2002 5:13:27 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: turtlegirl
I believe that in 20 years all cars and SUV's will be hybrid or electric anyway, and oil use will go down naturally from this technological advance.

Careful, your naiveté is showing.

The companies that sell the oil will never let oil use "go down". They are driving the market that keeps their billions of dollars flowing in. Only when they own all of the technology that allows these cars to be built will they allow it.

For example, do you know the name of the company that owns just about ALL of the facilities and resources today to manufacture the materials used in the production of solar electric cells?

Mobil Oil.


19 posted on 06/18/2002 5:22:29 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: turtlegirl
I know that this is a conservative website, but I don't understand how we all got so polarized over this issue.

I take exception to that stereotype. It is ignorant to think that conservatives in general do not want to find ways to combat pollution. Several on this thread have already pointed out the reason why we haven't gotten to that pristine state the Sierra Club so wants, I'll not bother repeating.

20 posted on 06/18/2002 5:27:55 AM PDT by RedWing9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson