Posted on 06/19/2002 11:33:59 AM PDT by sheltonmac
Those worrying about the erosion of liberty in this time of crisis often quote Benjamin Franklin, who said, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." The problem with this advice is that it is well over two centuries old, and no one back then could have imagined the dangers we face today. We are at war and should be expected to sacrifice some liberty for safety.
According to a national poll taken recently by the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, seven out of 10 Americans said that they would give up at least some of their civil liberties to improve security. That shouldn't be at all surprising considering the magnitude of the terrorist threat to our nation as well as the rest of the free world.
The same poll showed that about 90 percent of Americans favor having more police assigned to patrol public areas. 70 percent believe that there should be a law requiring adults to carry a national ID card with their photograph and Social Security number, and roughly half support the idea of random police searches in public places.
It is clear that most of America is behind the president in his effort to eradicate terrorism. The few individuals who are not seem to be those who are clinging too tightly to their precious Constitution. They refuse to give up even the smallest right, when doing so might mean the difference between victory and defeat.
These people, whether they realize it or not, are the terrorists' strongest allies in this war. Any attempt to detract from the plans of our president and his administration is tantamount to treason. If they can't learn the concept of "go along to get along," they need to be silenced. This war needs to be won-no matter what the cost.
When terrorists attacked our shores on Sept. 11, the fear-mongers immediately launched into their tirades against U.S. foreign policy, particularly our support for Israel. They talked about how the actions of our "empire" fueled the hatred of Islamic fundamentalists and how we should adopt a more isolationist position on global matters. All this, of course, is nonsense.
While the United States may have been able to avoid foreign entanglements at one time, we must realize that this is the 21st Century. This is not the world our forefathers knew. The Constitution may have been good enough for a fledgling nation 200 years ago, but we must evolve beyond such a narrow worldview if we hope to remain a global superpower.
Ronald Reagan once called us to be a "city on a hill," a place upon which all eyes of the world would be cast. If we allow a dusty old document like the Constitution to prevent us from doing what is necessary, we shall lose the respect of those who look to our nation as an example of greatness. No, we must maintain our lofty position in the world, and if that means behaving like an empire, so be it. The only alternative would be to succumb to terrorism, and that cannot be an option.
We need to be more positive. We need to be more supportive of our government, especially now. The president should not be criticized for doing his duty as Commander in Chief. Yet, through it all, there are those who not only see the glass of liberty as half-empty, they see it as the wrong beverage. This unpatriotic attitude was evident when President Bush signed the Patriot Act into law.
I feel I should point out that when President Bush signed the Patriot Act, he was doing what nearly half of all registered voters who actually bothered to vote elected him to do-lead. The people of this nation wanted a leader with an iron resolve and this president has shown that he is the man for the job. Rather than get behind the spirit of the Patriot Act, some disgruntled people would rather focus on the ambiguous aspects of the legislation and live in fear of the worst-case scenario.
As the poll above shows, this administration is merely doing the will of the people. Doing anything else would not bode well for the GOP this November. It would also hurt the president's chances of getting re-elected in 2004, and ensuring his re-election is absolutely vital to winning this war on terror. No other politician has shown such dedication and strength of character. Honestly, I shudder to imagine where this country would be without President Bush at the helm.
To those who insist on holding firm to the Constitution and making the government's job harder than it has to be, let me remind you that WE ARE AT WAR. Get behind the president and show your support. All of your worries are unfounded. If history is any indication, every civil liberty you give up now will be promptly restored once this war is over. That's a promise.
Liberty is overrated. Safety is what counts during times of crisis. After all, how can liberty be enjoyed if one cannot feel safe?
The ingenuity of Mankind, when freed from the bondage of fascist government controls and regulations, is a wonderful thing to behold indeed.
I would venture to say that those are some of the quietest crawlers around, too :-)
Wrong, Commie statist (I'm refering to the author here). Dead wrong. In case the author of this idiotic piece didn't pay attention during American history because he was too busy reading Trotsky, Ben Franklin and the other Founding Fathers got to experience the kind, gentle, and considerate ways of the British Army, who pretty much did whatever they damn well pleased until we grew so fed up we declared independance from Britian.
Ben Franklin got to experience troops stationing themselves in people's houses without permission, invading homes and searching through the possessions of British citizens without stated cause or permission, arrests without charges and convictions without evidence, excessive taxation without representation, and dozens of other injuries perpetuated by his own government which *we of today* have hardly ever experienced even mildly (though that is changing).
Compared to the dangers represented by a government oppressing its own people, those of terrorist acts are miniscule, especially when an out of control government begins to resemble an organization based on terror -- terror among its own citizens, such as the Soviets used to feel towards their government.
Terrorism must be fought, but not at the expense of self-enslavement.
Tuor
Give me liberty or give me death.
PS You should've put something to indicate this is a satire in the article, not the source. That I know there are fools who believe this stuff is enough to get my blood boiling every time I think about it.
I'm not sure I would call this piece satire, even though the author meant it to be viewed as such. Too many people in the US *really do* believe this, believe it completely and earnestly. For it to be truly satire, IMO, it would have to be something that seems logical, but is too absurd to be believed, and so is believable.
In short, too many people hold some or all of the views expressed in this piece for it to be truly satirical, IMO. It is, instead, a sort of Screwtape letter (written by CS Lewis), and more saddening (and maddening) than amusing, as is good satire.
Tuor
Give me liberty or give me death.
I sure hope so. That's Darwinian evolution in action. OTOH, it's not as easy to 'whip around' while holding a gun and put a bunch of bullets into someone. Also, a kid doesn't have a man's voice. A kid also shouldn't be out at night on a dark, deserted street.
But, this story doesn't seem plausable to me. I can't imagine such an event actually occurring in real life, but obviously you can.
Tuor
Give me liberty or give me death.
The big worry is that the professionals are the ones who flew the planes into those buildings. We are catching minnows while Jaws is bearing down on us from behind. Or, the Al-Queda guys don't mind losing idiots if it keeps us occupied while they prepare something new and nasty for us to deal with. If it causes us to relax, well, so much the better from their point of view.
Tuor
Give me liberty or give me death.
Spoken like a true leftist. Steven Spielburg said as much a few days ago.
You forgot to post this tiny little bit.
I'm glad I clicked on his link and saw that before I went off on him.
If he's really "a CA guy", I'd guess it's more than that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.