Replies

FreeReign, are you some sort of Saudi pseudo-conservative PR plant on this board ? You kinda resort to the sort of stock "What sources are you citing to prove some so-called Holocaust ?" arguments familiar from revisionist types in your denial of any link between Saudi Arabia and islamofascism.

You address nothing that I have said -- you refuse to address the specifics. Your logic simply states, to question conventional wisdom is to be a "revisionist type" a Nazi defending type, no specifics required. That -- your -- logic is now posted here in writing for everybody to see -- it ain't going away. You insult me and you are now even afraid to cut and paste what I have actually said in my post in your latest response. That would be too messy for you -- to deal with the specifics.

BTW Holocaust revisionists deny the Holocaust. There is not one place on this thread that I have said the Saudi's are not supporting terrorism. I have my suspicions that they are but I have not come to any conclusions. However, I will never let my dislike for the Saudi's hinder my objectivity. I do see a lot of leftist propaganda in Saudi critical articles -- something you feel very comfortable with and something, with your lack of objectivity, are afraid to discuss.

You kinda resort to the sort of stock "What sources are you citing to prove some so-called Holocaust ?"

BTW, I've check available information on the Holocaust including sources cited and have long come to the conclusion that their was a Holocaust. I want you to tell me what you base your belief in the Holocaust on and how it differs from the basis of my belief.

You kinda resort to the sort of stock "What sources are you citing to prove some so-called Holocaust ?"

BTW, I've check available information on the Holocaust including sources cited and have long come to the conclusion that their was a Holocaust. I want you to tell me what you base your belief in the Holocaust on and how it differs from the basis of my belief.

"I have my suspicions that they are but I have not come to any conclusions."

I'll bet if you jumped out of a 12 story window you would go SPLAT! I've never tried this myself mind you, but...

What is interesting is how you use a typical revisionist trick. Focusing on one source to pretend that all statements of a particular fact are narrow and biased. For instance you cite the New Republic and dismiss their criticism of Saudi support for terrorism (as if fundraisers for suicide bomber families, i.e., blow up a busload of Jews and your family will be taken care of did not qualify). Funny how you ignore the scathing evaluations of Saudi support for terrorism in those ultra left publications National Review and The Wall Street Journal.

Then again, you certainly do want us to have open eyes, open ears, and most of all, open minds.