Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimbabwe whites told it is against law to farm land
timesonline ^ | June 24, 2002 | From Jan Raath in Harare

Posted on 06/24/2002 4:21:21 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian

June 24, 2002

Zimbabwe whites told it is against law to farm land From Jan Raath in Harare

FROM midnight tonight it will be a crime for 2,900 Zimbabwean white farmers to produce food or exports to help to feed their country’s population, much of it now facing starvation.

In what could be the most serious single blow to the country’s already shattered economy, the farmers will tomorrow face arrest if they set foot on their lands. Twenty years ago the same farmers earned President Mugabe’s newly independent nation its reputation as the breadbasket of Africa. Now the law allows them only to stay in their homesteads.

Amendments last month to laws governing the confiscation of land order the closure of 60 per cent of the country’s productive farmland. In 45 days’ time even their homesteads will be denied them, when the Land Acquisition Act orders automatic eviction.

Violation of either deadline carries maximum penalties of two years in jail or a fine of Zim$20,000 (about £35).

For most of the remaining 40 per cent of the farmers, a rash of new 90-day expulsion orders is being issued, and 94 per cent of the 28 million acres of white farmland has been formally listed for Mr Mugabe’s land grab. A clause in the law allows farmers to apply for an exemption, and a group of tobacco farmers put in their applications last week. However, Jonathan Moyo, the Information Minister, was dismissive of the applications.

“They are a waste of time because they are cynical and sinister,” he said. “There will be no extra-judicial waiver. The land reform programme is real and irreversible.”

Jenni Williams, a spokesman for the Commercial Farmers’ Union, said: “This is insanity. Ranchers have got to water their cattle. They can’t just leave them. There are people with millions of dollars of wheat in the ground.

“People cannot just get up and walk away from everything they have built up in their lives. It’s absolutely unconstitutional.”

The farmers were divided on how to deal with the new threat, she said. “There will be those who will not abandon their homes and would rather face the authorities.”

Ironically, the most effective resistance to Mr Mugabe’s newest recklessness would be for all farmers to close down immediately and leave the regime with far worse food shortages, said Lindsay Campbell, 33, who farms tobacco and cattle in the Marondera area about 50 miles east of Harare.

“If we all just do what the minister says, they will realise pretty soon it wasn’t such a smart move,” she said. “On Monday we are going to move all our cattle off. We are going to stop everything on Tuesday. We are not going to move outside our security fence.”

The Campbells’ property has just been “resettled” for the second time. About two years ago it was allocated to peasant farmers who practise subsistence agriculture.

Now they have learnt that it has just been allocated again, this time to a senior government official. “The settlers are not going to like this,” she said.

Farmers will lose not only their land and homes, but all property that is “permanently” connected to the land, like pumps cemented into the ground and powerful electricity generators.

The new law says that farmers have the right to take their moveable property with them. In practice, most owners have been illegally forced, usually under police scrutiny, to leave with a couple of suitcases of clothing.

The tractors, earth-moving equipment, computers and sheds full of crops left behind, have been claimed by the senior ruling party functionaries, top military and police officers and their relatives — Zimbabwe’s new farming class — as their own.

Hopes for compensation have almost entirely been abandoned, especially now that the Government is in effect bankrupt and inflation is running at 120 per cent. Economists estimate that £5.5 billion worth of moveable assets have been illegally impounded or looted since February 2000, when ruling party militants began invading white farms.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; africawatch; farm; land; zimbabwe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: mvpel
Reminds me of "Atlas Shrugged." Sowing salt would definitely be the John Galt thing to do there, the Francisco d'Anconia thing to do. Let them eat their stolen dirt. Odds are that this former breadbasket will wind up receiving food aid from other "People's States" around the world.

In retrospect it would not be the Christian thing to do. I was mad when I wrote this.

No doubt some Americans in 1939 could see the handwriting on the wall in Germany, too, but couldn't do much about that either. It's just very frustrating, especially when you KNOW that food aid is going to be used to prop the dictators up.

61 posted on 06/25/2002 7:00:30 AM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
or Ford and IBM who continued to do business with the Germans during WWII?

What do you have to back that up?

62 posted on 06/25/2002 8:24:43 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
I think that sowing the fields with salt is a great idea. Just like I would break my TV if I knew a thief was about to steal it.
63 posted on 06/25/2002 8:28:50 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I said I couldn't vouch for the truth of the claims.

Within the last couple of years books and articles have appeared making those claims. I haven't researched them. All I can tell you is that they were published by mainstream publishers and reviewed in the mainstream press. I take that to mean that they should be treated seriously. You might feel differently.

64 posted on 06/25/2002 8:52:33 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
"IBM and the Nazis"

Here's a Google I just did in response to your question. I don't have enough interest to pursue it but you can if you wish. It's probably just as easy to do the same with Ford.

65 posted on 06/25/2002 9:01:02 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Thanks, but I have seen nothing to suggest that IBM or Ford did business with the Nazi's DURING the war.
66 posted on 06/25/2002 9:12:18 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Of course, some cross the line. Sell to the enemy. But even here the line is blurred.

Not in this case, Mugabe is pure evil. No one should be doing business with him.
67 posted on 06/25/2002 4:44:13 PM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
Ok. But I'll bet plenty are.
68 posted on 06/25/2002 5:53:10 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: Meaghan
You skipped Arizona.
71 posted on 06/25/2002 10:47:26 PM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Meaghan
Them ain't good numbers.

No they ain't.

73 posted on 06/26/2002 2:06:18 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson