Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate condemns Pledge ruling by 99-0 margin
Fox News

Posted on 06/26/2002 2:52:30 PM PDT by mrobison

The U. S. Senate has condemned the Ninth Circuit Court's ruling on the Pledge of Allegience by a 99-0 margin.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-174 next last
To: CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; Snow Bunny; ..
(((ping))))


41 posted on 06/26/2002 3:03:33 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Probably Sen. Jesse Helms. He is recovering from his heart surgery.
42 posted on 06/26/2002 3:03:43 PM PDT by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
All this is nice and good, but it means nothing from a legal standpoint. Only a higher court or a constitutional amendment can reverse this idiot. Otherwise, a resolution has about as much standing as Yassir Arafat's "condemnation" of suicide bombers.
43 posted on 06/26/2002 3:04:07 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Well, well, well. Isn't that interesting? Who's the one?

I'd like to know that one myself

44 posted on 06/26/2002 3:04:29 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
But you know as well as I do that many of those senators are secretly cheering inside. Hillary, Daschle, Boxer, Cantwell, Stabenow and the other ultra-liberals are overjoyed.

They know if they say anything in public that they will never be reelected, so they are waiting for the anger over this to subside. Because after all the anger is done, unless the decision is overturned, it still stands, and they get what they want anyway.

45 posted on 06/26/2002 3:04:43 PM PDT by FF578
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Well, well, well. Isn't that interesting? Who's the one?

It might have been Helms, he hasn't voted on anything all week.

46 posted on 06/26/2002 3:05:08 PM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
The U. S. Senate has condemned the Ninth Circuit Court's ruling on the Pledge of Allegience by a 99-0 margin.

Look at 'em, trying to head off an electoral debacle of Biblical proportions (literally) at the pass...

47 posted on 06/26/2002 3:05:53 PM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
In Massachusetts, the Governor made an appointment to the Supreme Court a woman from Afica that's only been in America for two years,

made her the Chief Justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Court.

48 posted on 06/26/2002 3:06:30 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Or Jesse Helms who is still recovering from heart surgery.
49 posted on 06/26/2002 3:07:25 PM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I enjoy reading "old" books and such -- and it is truly amazing how much things have changed over the years. I'm sure you've heard the proper way to boil a frog.

But the old textbooks are a great read, along with Old Farmers Almanac, the World Book and other encyclopaedias prior to about 1970, this was before all the political correct commie pinko crap started infiltrating our precious bodily fluids on a major scale.

50 posted on 06/26/2002 3:09:53 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: laconic
All this is nice and good, but it means nothing from a legal standpoint.

True, but the real "juice" in this story is the public debate it will ignite. The Pledge is part of all our childhoods. It will flush the atheistic lib's hidden agenda out from the darkness into the light just as 9/11 did with "inclusion" and moral relativism.

I think this is a huge gift with a pretty bow to conservatives. This is definitely a pitch we can hit out of the park. This is the kind of thing that can turn an election in a big way.

51 posted on 06/26/2002 3:10:18 PM PDT by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: blau993
Actually, I assumed it was Senator Jesse Helms. I know he had been recovering from an operation a month ago. (God Bless him and a Speedy Recovery, Jesse)
52 posted on 06/26/2002 3:10:46 PM PDT by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: laconic
This is just a formal b*itch slap is all.

The 9th circuit will just say "Hit me Baby One More Time" like they always do.

53 posted on 06/26/2002 3:10:48 PM PDT by Rad_J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
"Now, if we can just make this type of ruling an issue in the campaign, we can hoist the Dems over their petard. The pledge once worked against Dukakis. Maybeit can work against the Senate Dems." I think it's an outstanding issue. The table has already been set by administration and Republican complaining about Daschle/Leahy obstructionism. This decision destroys the argument that the Dims are blocking "extremist" Republican judges by showing the country that it's the Dim judges who are extremists and we need Bush's judges to restrain them! It's a wonderful issue.
54 posted on 06/26/2002 3:10:51 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Oops!!LOL! I thought the same thing!!
55 posted on 06/26/2002 3:11:30 PM PDT by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I thought everyone knew who was The One.


56 posted on 06/26/2002 3:11:33 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
S00OO, they, the Dems, will come out lukewarm in opposition to the Circuit Court ruling. BUT, NOT strong enough to annoy their liberal base, but strong enough to be registered as an angry vote, so they are on record as going along with the Republicans and ergo not subject to being politically attacked.

watch them, this is exactly how they have nervously and urgently strategized it over the last few hours in D.C.... they will be right in the middle of the road on this one.

57 posted on 06/26/2002 3:12:26 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Walk the talk - pass an Amendment. Otherwise just BS.
58 posted on 06/26/2002 3:12:59 PM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drill Alaska
What recourse do we have against justices who, enthroned for life, usurp power to fasten their soppy opinions on society?

They too can be impeached, and have been. But first we have to elect some representatives that have a backbone.

59 posted on 06/26/2002 3:13:00 PM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
This has absolutely nothing to do with GOD or religion. This is a frontal attack on the "Republic"! The traitors continue their unrelenting advance on the Republic by smokescreening their real goal and desires. We are a duly constituted Republic not a democracy as they so desparately seek! Give em a one way ticket to Cuba, China or North Korea for starters; plenty more dead end paradises that are too good for this bunch!
60 posted on 06/26/2002 3:13:09 PM PDT by Windy-Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson