Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sacramento atheist who filed suit holds court at home [Who is Michael A. Newdow?]
SF ^ | 6-27-02 | Robert Salladay

Posted on 6/27/2002, 10:53:37 AM by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 4/13/2004, 9:40:26 AM by Jim Robinson. [history]

Sacramento -- Michael A. Newdow has Connie Chung waiting for him, an answering machine full of threats from a new cadre of enemies, and an outraged Congress and president -- but the dishes still need to be done.

Newdow, the 49-year-old emergency room doctor who convinced a federal court to throw out the Pledge of Allegiance, nervously rinsed off plastic plates and dishes in his suburban Sacramento house Wednesday while talking to a friend on the telephone.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: atheist; newdow; pledgeofallegiance; sacramento
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 6/27/2002, 10:53:37 AM by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The thing that surprised me most about this article was the fact that the guy was buying soap.
2 posted on 6/27/2002, 10:58:15 AM by YourAdHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This kind of crap makes me want to hide under a rock!
3 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:01:01 AM by makoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I hope that they would think I am one of the greatest Americans," said Newdow, managing somehow to sound modest in the process. "I am upholding the constitution. I'm a patriot."

It's all about him and his delusions of grandeur.

4 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:06:36 AM by Lorenb420
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Being an agnostic myself, I can't see the harm in those words. If you don't believe in God, just don't say those words during the pledge. As far as creeping religion, most if not all of this has been around for a long time, and if it was going to cause any deaths (or plane attacks), it would have by now.
5 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:07:38 AM by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This guy admits that Atheism is a religion -- and cannot,
along with two brainless justices, and Alan Combs, see
that by trying to take "under God" out of the Pledge of
Allegiance he is imposing his religion on others.
6 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:15:52 AM by Woodkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Isn't it funny that of 30 global wars going on now, 29 of them involve Muslims. Whose "God" is creating all the trouble? Not America's.
7 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:22:15 AM by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I hope that they would think I am one of the greatest Americans," said Newdow, managing somehow to sound modest in the process. "I am upholding the constitution. I'm a patriot."

::rolls eyes::

8 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:24:04 AM by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I hope that they would think I am one of the greatest Americans. I am upholding the constitution. I'm a patriot."

Such modesty.

9 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:24:18 AM by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I found this buried in a Sacbee article about Mister Newdow yesterday.......

It seems he has been feeling like an "outsider" for quite awhile...

Newdow, an emergency room physician with a law degree acting as his own attorney, recently lost a bid in federal court in Sacramento to halt President Bush's faith references.

But a federal judge last month tossed out the suit to make President stop mixing politics and his Christian faith.

Newdow, 49, built his lawsuit against Bush around a prayer delivered at the 2000 inauguration by the Rev. Franklin Graham, son of evangelist Billy Graham, that was based on Christian beliefs and referenced "the Lord Jesus Christ."

Newdow complained that permitting any prayer at a presidential inauguration violated the First Amendment's establishment clause.

And, he said, Graham's references to Christian figures and concepts "further excluded theistic non-Christians" and "showed a preference for a particular religious belief." The prayer made him feel like an "outsider," he added.

He did not seek monetary damages but asked the court to enjoin Bush from drawing Christianity into his duties in the future.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Kristin Sudhoff Door argued that courts lack authority to meddle in the internal affairs of other government branches.

26 posted on 6/26/02 7:42 PM Eastern by Dog [

10 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:28:30 AM by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
That old Chinese blessing:

May Michael Newdow get what he wishes for.

[He seems to think his rights are more important than the rights of most other Americans. Maybe Mr. Newdow should move to Saudi Arabia for a few months and vocalize his atheism there--they might not be so accommodating in providing Newdow with his unalienable rights. Come to think of it, since those unalienable rights are endowed on us by the Creator, and Newdow doesn't believe in the Creator, then by his own logic, he has no endowed unalienable rights. Buttkicker, isn't it, Newdow, when your own logic becomes your own buttkicker.]
11 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:32:09 AM by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorenb420
Newdow said his family was not particularly religious growing up, but he considers atheism a religion

I see, so now we all have to comply with his religion.

Saw this guy on H&C last night. He is definitely an egotist. He's right and everyone else is wrong, but if we just listen to him everything will be alright.

12 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:32:17 AM by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I'd love to be in spitting distance of this scumbag.
13 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:40:15 AM by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
And when atheists are the majority in this country,

Ain't gonna happen. Muslims breed faster.

14 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:40:22 AM by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hopefully he won't go the way of Madalyn Murray O'Hair.
15 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:44:46 AM by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Come to think of it, since those unalienable rights are endowed on us by the Creator, and Newdow doesn't believe in the Creator, then by his own logic, he has no endowed unalienable rights.

No argument here. Where did his rights come from, pond scum ?

16 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:46:24 AM by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Congress and the President united against Michael A. Nedow, but not united against William J. Clinton? What kind of dog & pony show is being paraded in front of us by these noble "elected representatives"?
17 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:51:16 AM by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Who is this person?

This "man" is a small person and living proof that one can be educated way beyond one's intelligence.
He may have two degrees, but is totally lacking in common sense.
To say nothing of having even the vaguest notion of the social contract or common courtesy.
I wonder where he bought the kid?

18 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:53:07 AM by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Who is Michael A. Newdow?]

Radical Fundamentalist Atheist.

19 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:55:08 AM by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
As an atheist, I had no problems with the words, just as now when I am a Christian, I have no problems with "liberty and justice for all" which is not true. Especially now.
20 posted on 6/27/2002, 11:56:12 AM by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson