Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Quinn interview David Shippers and Janya Davis concerning OKC terrorist connection(6/27/02).
WRRK - The War Room archives ^ | 06/27/2002 | Quinn and Rose on WRRK

Posted on 06/28/2002 5:26:09 AM PDT by McGruff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last
To: Nancie Drew
You know, that post may be the clearest answer to a 'why' question I have ever seen on FR.

Thanks,

PS: I think I would have given the info the the TM defense team, but I can understand why one would not, after all TM was guilty. I think, in the interest catching the other badguys before they struck again, the info had to get out, by any means necessary, no matter who got 'the story.'

181 posted on 07/12/2002 11:52:22 AM PDT by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Please see reply #179.
182 posted on 07/12/2002 12:01:21 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Aside from the he said she said aspects - which cannot be independently, Nancie has largely agreed with your claim:" That JD had prior-warning information that was not made public or handed over to the TM defense, until may 2001.

My free advice, declare victory and move on WRT J Davis.

183 posted on 07/12/2002 12:18:23 PM PDT by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
A bump in support of OKCSubmarier!

Keep up the good fight, for the truth to be known about this terrible crime.

184 posted on 07/12/2002 12:24:01 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Triple; carenot; glorygirl; Uncle Bill; Fred Mertz; nunya bidness
I am indebted to your efforts here Triple.

With respect to the memo, yes it has been established that the warning memo was improperly sat on for too many years so I can feel a victory has been won on the warning memo story.

But the real victory comes when the majority of American people becomes convinced that the FBI, DOJ and Federal officials not only covered up and knew about OKC but that the people are still at risk from terror attacks because many of the same bad officials and policies are in place. Only then do we have a chance of getting things corrected well enough to better save lives.

I am very concerned we are running out of time quickly and this is why the seven year delay on the warning memo was so damaging to getting things corrected much sooner-we have lost years of valuable time in the face of more, imminent attacks..

I still have work to do to save lives and our country. Much thanks for your help.

185 posted on 07/12/2002 12:50:31 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Please see replies 169-185. Thanks.
186 posted on 07/12/2002 12:54:40 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Triple; BlueDogDemo; Nita Nupress
I appreciate that. I also remembered that she tried to get ABC News interested. I think it was in the same time frame as the McVeigh execution. It was someone from the morning show that I had contacted because I was upset with them for using Samir Khalil as an example of someone who had lost someone in the bombing. (his ex-wife). It started a dialogue with the person that I talked to and Jayna tried to get him interested in the story of the prior warning among other things. It is so important that people are now listening and I hope that some of these groups and people will be investigated.

As far as giving information to the McVeigh team, what I understand is that Jayna would have had to go to jail or reveal her source. It was something about it being a Federal death penalty case and she could not stand on reporter/source privilege, or whatever that is called. Then if she gave up her source, that source would then have to go to jail or reveal his sources which would probably put lives at risk. Also, there could have been a mistrial since the government was not giving everything that they should have to McVeigh's defense. The monkey really should be on the back of the government on this, not on Jayna, since they didn't want any of the ME stuff to come out. Actually, it was out of Jayna's hands, anyway, because Judge Matsch wouldn't allow anything about the ME connection. It obviously was not necessary to bring in the ME connection to get a conviction and maybe Matsch knew that. I don't know for sure why he didn't allow it.

Also, I believe Jayna was pregnant at the time and still technically employed by KFOR. Even though she had walked out, they still considered her under contract and they were paying her medical insurance. The lawsuit against the station by Hussain determined a lot of what they would let her do. She was still bound legally by what the lawyers were telling her to do. They did allow her to have her own lawyer, but he was being paid by the liability company on the lawsuit.
187 posted on 07/12/2002 1:22:30 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: All; Nita Nupress; BlueDogDemo
Please see post #174. I forgot to flag anyone to it.
188 posted on 07/12/2002 1:23:58 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: All; Nita Nupress; BlueDogDemo; Triple
I have known for several years that OKCSubmariner had been asked to quit using two reporters names at KFOR when he went on talk shows.

I am sure that most Freepers would rather have just good insight from other Freepers and I feel most comfortable doing that. It is not pleasant to have to confront someone with untruths. And you good folks don't know the inside scoop. If you were to put OKCSub and I in a room and I gave you my background, it would be so reassuring to all of you. I have been at my present company for 16 years or thereabouts and am in a very high level position. I come in contact with many prominent citizens of this city and am friends with many of them, also. I have written one lengthy article on the bombing back in 1999 that was actually published in a Colorado paper, but I am not a writer by profession so that is why it was just one. It was totally based on things in the public record because of my frustration of someone not putting it all together. I got that out of my system so have not written any more. I have been appointed to a state committee as a parent volunteer that had to do with education that had great success my last year in bringing a conservative voice to our decisions. I am presently on a county committee for my denomination that deals with ethical issues. Only about three of us are lay people. I am also involved in a national organization that deals with political issues.

Pat gave his background and it is impressive. But he has indicated that he is unemployed, evidently since 1986. I cannot compete time-wise with that. I have a new grandson I want to spend time with, I need to help Jayna with things she needs to get done and I have a full-time job. I will do my best to give some insight that may be helpful, but it is eating my gut out to hear the lies that OKCSub keeps on posting, and it does not seem to help with the Freepers to have my insight. Most seem to not want to listen and even think that the government is out to get him when I try to set the record straight. I know how Jayna felt when no one seems to want to listen.
189 posted on 07/12/2002 1:53:03 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Thank you for your bump of support and kind words in reply #184.

The real victory will come when the majority of the American people come to realize that the FBI, DOJ and Federal officials knew about and covered up the OKC bombing.

We must work quickly to make badly needed changes of personnel, policies and procedures in the Federal agencies to better protect Americans from imminent terror attacks. Sadly we lost almost seven important years in this effort because of the delays in informing the AMerican people about the shortcomings of the Feds over the handling of the official prio warning memo by Bodasnky on the OKC bombing.

190 posted on 07/12/2002 1:58:51 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: honway; carenot; glorygirl; lawdog; Uncle Bill; Fred Mertz
Once again the poster in reply #189 is badly and sadly mistaken.
191 posted on 07/12/2002 2:01:00 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Triple; carenot; Fred Mertz; lawdog; Uncle Bill; glorygirl; B4Ranch; Lancey Howard; Ronneil; ...
BTW, why was it not ok for me to talk on talk radio about KFORTV investigations made public in their broadcasts or information that I confirmed independently, without being told not to talk about the public KFORTV broadcast information and my own work relating to them?? I did not work for KFORTV and I am under no oblgigation to them or their reporters to keep silent about public information or even the use of their names(?) This situation of being told to keep quiet by KFORTV reporters is nuts or a dishonest attempt to try and keep the public from knowing the complete truth about the OKC bombing (more likely).

This reminds me of the time Davis called me up in 1997 and stridently demanded that I not talk on talk radio shows about the story of Davis giving her interview tapes and affadavits (but no prior warning memo) to the House Task Force on Terrorism and other ME connection info to the OK County DA Bob MAcy SIX months before the OK county grand jury being seated. The Daily Oklahoman published a story on this in full giving Davis name as the source in early 1997 (also about six months before the OKC county grand jury was seated) based on an interview Davis gave the Daily Oklahoman.

Charles Key strongly believed Bob MAcy helped cover up the OKC bombing and it is possible that Macy used Davis'advanced (six mojths early)info to help do the cover up even if Davis may not have intended it that way.. Macy and the DAs office had a chance to interview the Iraqi Hussaini when he came back to OKC in 1997 (grand jury still going on)for a deposition in his lawsuit with Davis. MAcy knew Hussaini was in town but he and the grand jury investigators deliberatley avoided having Hussaini questioned (the FBI avoided the questioning too).

I told Davis in her call that her giving the ME info to the House and Macy was public information and knowledge which she had given to the Daily Oklahoman in her interview and which was published in early 1997. I told Davis therefore I was under no obligation not to talk about the story on talk radio. In fact I did talk about the story and read from the Daily OKlahoman article quoting Davis. At no time did Davis actually say I was not to utter her name on talk radio, just that I was not to talk about the story, a story which she had no right to demand I not talk about. THis pattern of Davis behavior over this and other evidence in the OK bombing case was repeated with me many times over the years, and it was absurd and made me very leary of Davis motives and judgement.

Brad Edwards also tried the same approach. AS I had told Davis, Edwards had no right to tell me not to talk about public stories on KFORTV or stories I had developed and confirmed independently. And Edwards never told me not to use his name- he just did not want me to talk about public KFORTV stories anymore on talk radio -absurd!

The two KFORTV reporters Edwards and David did try to muzzle me about KFORTV public stoties, but they did not ask me not to use their names on talk radio. If they meant to tell me not to use their names, they failed to do so and I think it would have been dumb for them to do so in the context of our conversations. It would have been stupid for them to tell me not to use their NAMES when they were public figures doing public broadcasts.

So once again the poster of reply #189 is badly mistaken and very misinformed.

But the poster is doing me a great favor by reminding me of important stories I need to tell like the one about Davis trying to muzzle me about her giving her ME info (not warning memo) to Macy SIX months before the COunty Grand Jury (maybe that was a good thing or was it?).

192 posted on 07/12/2002 3:13:13 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
I have not forgotten you and Murah!

I have to prioritize like everybody.

I am getting lost in this Jayna versus you stuff.

Yes, the whole of government is trying to keep Murrah from putting them in jail.

All of those guilty should be on trial.

Time is our enemy.

The weekend is here, nothing but time....
193 posted on 07/12/2002 3:46:59 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew; thinden; mancini; Sal; Nita Nupress; OKCSubmariner
The monkey really should be on the back of the government on this, not on Jayna, since they didn't want any of the ME stuff to come out.

I agree with that statement Nancie. I also have learned not to trust the government to act in the peoples' interest over the years. The government always acts in its own interests.

It's unfortunate that "We the people" were intended to be the government, but we have let that power get stolen from under our noses. Thanks for sharing your experiences and insights.

194 posted on 07/12/2002 7:32:38 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew; OKCSubmariner; glorygirl; Askel5; lawdog; carenot; Betty Jo
Finally, after reading through the differences of opinion for days, Nancie has made it perfectly clear.

Nancie:"I want to set the record straight on another matter. (But this does not mean it is the only other inaccuracy of OKCSub). Jayna Davis has the utmost respect for Dan Vogel. She and I have talked about him several times during the last seven years. One thing that she has often said is that in his position as FBI spokesman, he had never lied to Jayna. Pat has made a statement about Davis fully acknowledging Vogel's misconduct as it relates to the OKC bombing. She has never made that statement to Pat. .... You can take my word that she never said to me anything derogatory about Dan Vogel).

Is it not perfectly clear to anyone that has followed the evidence of the Middle Eastern involvement in the OKC bombing that the FBI, including Agent Vogel, conspired to cover up the participation of John Doe 2 and the Middle Eastern connection in the mass murder of 168 innocent people. John Doe 2 may have very well played a role in the attack on America on 9-11. The Islamic terrorist network that participated in the Oklahoma bombing certainly participated in the 9-11 attack. Mr. Vogel and his fellow agents have blood on there hands. Anyone who defends the liars that let the terrorists of 4-19 go free to attack Americans again, may want to reconsider which side they have chosen.

I would respectfully suggest anyone aligned with the lies perpetuated by the FBI in OKC not show up here and throw out accusations of lying against a man that has poured blood, sweat, and tears to inform the American people about the truth in the OKC bombing.

195 posted on 07/12/2002 8:14:57 PM PDT by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: honway; OKCSubmariner
I hope you know that I do not think OKC Submariner is lying.
196 posted on 07/12/2002 8:33:04 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
I know. Until I read the above statement about Davis and Vogel I had little appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge that Pat has faced.
197 posted on 07/12/2002 8:52:11 PM PDT by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Jayna Davis has the utmost respect for Dan Vogel

Pat, I have always had great respect for your work. But when you chose to share with the forum your differences with Jayna Davis, I thought it was an unwise choice. Not because you weren't right, but because I did not think the distraction from the more important story was worth it.

I was wrong. Jayna Davis knows there was an Islamic terrorist connection to the OKC bombing. Jayna Davis knows the FBI covered it up and Jayna Davis has the utmost respect for individuals involved in the cover up. That is a story that had to be told and you were the only one with the guts to tell it. I salute you, sir.

198 posted on 07/12/2002 9:03:10 PM PDT by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; honway; nunya bidness; lawdog; carenot; archy; glorygirl; Lancey Howard; ntrulock; ...
I agree a monkey should be on the back of the government for covering up the ME AND domestic John Does (FBI informants) in the OKC bombing for all these years.

But my opinion is that Davis also helped the government in effect (even if she claims she did not intend to) cover up the ME connection for over six years by not going public with the details of Bodansky’s official prior warning notice to the House Task Force, Congressmen and Federal law enforcement and intelligence groups when Davis knew the importance of doing so. For Davis to accede to Bodansky’s wishes because Bodansky told Davis it was "too hot" (politically?) tells me she helped Bodansky and the House Task Force (the government) cover up the forewarning of the OKC bombing for six years.

And the picture is even worse. Davis directly and deliberately interfered with key John Doe witnesses I originally approached and cultivated long before Jayna Davis approached them:. The witnesses Arlene Blanchard, John Morris Kuper and Adlai Abraham were told by Davis not to talk with me and Jasper and Key and Davis tried to scare them off by deliberately making denigrating statements to some of the witnesses about me, Jasper and Key.

Some have excused these acts as that of an aggressive unscrupulous reporter trying to steal a story. While that could be true, what is more important is that these acts by Davis in effect have and still are delaying the public and Congress from knowing the details of the OKC bombing and is helping the government cover up the bombing details even longer.

But my analysis is more than just a dissection and criticism of what Davis did in the past regardless of her reasons in the past.

I am very concerned that there is more evidence we have yet to learn about that Davis may still be sitting on such as the details of the 22-24 witness affidavits Davis has kept from the public for over five years and such as Israeli forewarnings to the US government I believe Davis also has kept from the public( I have written much before about this on FR).

And Davis has played and may still be playing a very active role in undermining evidence being brought forward of FBI informants who also were domestic John Does. She is entitled to a different opinion about domestic John Does, but Davis taking an active role to downplay exploring the domestic John Does roles has also kept the public and Congress from knowing more about the OKC bombing and the FBI cover-up.

I want the public and the FreeRepublic to know that my criticisms and complaints about Davis not only refer to her past and on going actions, they also refer to her actively resisting my efforts and those of Key, JAsper and some attorneys for over five years to get Davis to not continue holding back all this information when we have explained to her the importance of going public. These are not after the fact "quarterbacking" or "hindsight is better than foresight" criticisms and complaints. They are complaints that Key and Jasper and I have been making to and about Jayna Davis for over six years. Yet she has persisted in her refusals and by so doing has helped the government cover-up regardless of whether or not she has intended to help the government cover-up..

199 posted on 07/12/2002 9:21:10 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Thank you.

BUMP!

200 posted on 07/13/2002 2:33:50 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson