Dems Claim Bush and Cheney Killed Flight 93 Heroes

Newsmax.com ^ | June 29, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

[OXENinFLA]

WHY? What if BOTH did happen. What if the time lines coincided, They did rush the cockpit and took over the plane at the same time the decision was made to take that plane out of the sky. I don't think that Pres. Bush was on the phone with Mr. Beamer. Bush had NO knowledge of what was going on on the plane. All they knew was that there was a plane, who I'm sure was not responding to radio traffic, and was not diverting to land.
Let's just use our imaginations for a minute and say they rushed the cockpit and took it over, which would explain the Black Box recording, and just shortly there after the missile hits the plane (debris field 8 miles away ).


How then could any of the information been pass along if it all happened within a matter of minutes?
Once in the cockpit did they try and take the plane back or just crash it?
Did they then have any capabilities to radio anyone to inform them they had taken back the plane?

Imagine what would happen to the airline industry if the SHEEPLE were to figure out why sometimes F-16 "Escort" planes w/ problems aboard. What do they think the F-16's are there for? Do they think that the F-16's will somehow attach it's wings to the 747's wings on either side and then the F-16's will control the 747 and fly it away to safety? The F-16's are there for one reason only, TO SHOOT A PLANE OUT OF THE SKY that's it. And as ANYONE who fly's today needs to realize that, but not all do.

This is a PR persons greatest dream to have the ability to cover something more sinister with the a more beautiful truth, and have the evidence to back up the story. People on flight 93 DID rush the cockpit. But what happened after or during that is the Question.

[steve50]

If it was a shoot down the people would demand that pilots be armed. Not sure our leaders want to take a step backwards in their 30 year war on weapons of self defense.

[Savage Beast]

He was obviously trolling for a fight. Sometimes you feel like saying, "Drop dead," but sometimes it's best to give a straight answer. In any case, I think there are things to be said. There is a difference, and we might as well explain it. Thanks for the note, R. --SB

[Lower55]

You missed my point, too. See post #16. The 'they' I was referring to were the democrats. "They" would not use your reasoning to help make a conclusion.

[TomB]

The rubble was spread for miles and there were wittnesses.I live there man.

Witnesses that it was shot down? Where?

I live there too and watched the local coverage all day. What station had these "witnesses"?

[UncleJeff]

Here's a link to the transcripts of the debates. Kindly point out where he said anything remotely like that.

http://www.debates.org/pages/d elayed_transcripts.html

[First_Salute]

Bump.

[RJayneJ]

Can you give me a post number? };^D)

[terilyn]

Sure, it's the one I replies to #150 ;)

[terilyn]

ack replies=replied

[RJayneJ]

Thanks! With this new system, there are a lot of pages and multiple posts to look through. };^D)

[steve-b]

I never even really considered the possibility that the plain was brought down by the passengers. Debris was found eight miles away.

Er, you do know what happens when a jumbo jet tries to make radical maneuvers (as if the controls were being slammed randomly in a melee), right? (Silly me. If you did know you wouldn't trot out this tinfoil-hat nonsense.)

The intercepted phone calls were a godsend - what a sensational story.

The theory that the plane was brought down by an event independent of the known decision of the passengers at just the right moment is for people who think that Occam's Razor is the brand name of the terrorists' weapons.

[steve-b]

What if the time lines coincided, They did rush the cockpit and took over the plane at the same time the decision was made to take that plane out of the sky.

When you have to resort to far-fetched coincidences to save your theory, it's time to let it go.

[steve-b]

I have this hunch that what's REALLY getting to them is the GOP seliing photos of the president for 150 bucks a pop...and even DEMOCRAT VOTERS bought copies.

Well, geez, why don't they just sell their own photos?

[antivenom]

Bump

[antivenom]

Rush talking about this NOW

[SupplySider]

But, of course, facts have never prevented the RATs from spewing vicious lies!

Yes, these folks use facts and non-facts just as Nazis, Soviets, and Islamsts: as weapons, without regard for truth. Al Gore does it every time he makes a speech. I guess I am a bit naive, but I am still a bit shocked that a major party that gets half the votes does this.

[Puliko]

The only reason the DemRats are saying this is because they did it themselves. One answer to this allegation: RON BROWN.

[TheWriterInTexas]

"I have repeatedly said the only time to use Social Security money is in times of war, times of recession, or times of severe emergency. And I mean that. I mean that." (Transcript of Remarks by Presidents Bush and Fox on Departure to Toledo, Ohio -- U.S. Newswire, Inc, September 6, 2001)

Sorry, I was incorrect about it being specifically mentioned in the general-election debates. I'm reviewing transcripts of the primary debates to see if it appeared there...but I know he spoke of it before September 6'01.

[UncleJeff]

Note also that he addresses spending Social Security money there, not running deficits over the horizon.