Jimmy Carter: Traitor

There is only one thing we need to know about Jimmy Carter, and it isn't the increasingly distasteful sex life he has been boasting about since the days he had lust in his heart. No other commentator we know of has said it, so I will. Carter is a traitor. He has committed the treason the Constitution cites, and needs to be indicted, tried and convicted.

I'm not talking about his recent trip to Communist-occupied Cuba, which has made him even more of a joke--if that were possible--than he was when we first heard that a man named Jimmy was running for President of the United States. Yes, I know he hails from the South, but even Sleazy Bill--another traitor--doesn't call himself Billy. Carter has never met a dictator he doesn't like; if pressed, he probably could find excuses for Hitler. But I'm not talking about his diplomatic recognition of Communist-occupied China, and his betrayal of our loyal friends on Taiwan. I'm not talking about the crown of St. Stephen, which loyal Hungarians had protected from the Nazis, but which Jimmy gave the Communists to legitimize them. No, Carter's treason consists of the fact that, only because of Jimmy, our enemies, the Communist Chinese, now control both ends of our Panama Canal. These are the same Red Chinese who boast that they may nuke Los Angeles and committed an act of war against the United States last year when they shot down a U.S. Navy aircraft.

From the beginning, the stated goal of the Communists was to seize the Panama Canal, as part of their strategy to surround and strangle the United States. The late Soviet spy Alger Hiss played a part in that strategy as a top State Department official. Later, David Rockefeller, of the then Chase Manhattan Bank, chose Carter as the Democrat President who would help us survive Watergate. Yes, they actually sat down around a table at one of David's New York estates, where Rockefeller interviewed Jimmy for the job. Jimmy became a factotum of Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations, the secret Marxist outfit to which Carter gave control of his administration.

The United States bought and paid for the Canal Zone as surely as you bought your house, except that the United States paid in gold. The United States had--and still has--title. The United States built the Canal after France had failed. The United States paid fees for the Canal to Panama every year. Indeed, the United States created the nation of Panama for the purpose.

But Jimmy Carter ignored all this. He grovelled in apology for our history in Panama, and sent his diplomats to arrange the betrayal of our country. Under Jimmy, the treaties that would terminate U.S. ownership were moving through the Senate. But the Senate balked. The senators feared that the treaties did not sufficiently protect American interests. So something called the DeConcini Reservation was born. Named for Arizona Senator Dennis DeConcini, the Reservation would have allowed the United States to intervene in an emergency to protect the Canal, a provision that satisfied other members of the Senate.

Carter took the Reservation to Omar Torrijos, the Marxist crook then dictating in Panama. Torrijos rejected the DeConcini Reservation, insisting on absolutely no conditions for the gift of the priceless American property Carter was scheming to give him. So, Jimmy told Torrijos privately that he could delete the Reservation from the version of the treaty Panama would adopt.

But Jimmy didn't tell the U.S. Senate. He knew that, were the Senators informed, they would throw the treaty out. That's right! Carter committed fraud on the Senate. He allowed Torrijos to ratify one version of the key treaty, while the U.S. Senate innocently ratified another.

Few Americans have negotiated treaties. Most Americans have negotiated contracts. It should go without saying that everyone must sign the final version of a contract--the same version. If one of the parties is deceived into signing an earlier version, the contract is void. And a treaty is a contract between nations. The treaty Carter forced on the Senate is a fraud and therefore is void. There is no treaty and never was. The United States still owns the Canal Zone.

Before the Panama Canal treaties, many commentators were warning that, were the United States to surrender the Zone, it would inevitably fall into the wrong hands. Conspiracy assets in the media typically derided them, but now of course it has. Again, the Communist Chinese, whose ultimate goal is the destruction of the United States, now control the Zone and both ends of the Canal, via corporations that front for Beijing. The Communist goal for the Canal has been achieved, thanks to Jimmy Carter.

Remember that Cuba is still deservedly on the federal government's list of terrorist nations. There is probably no area of terrorism in which Castro does not participate. A few years ago, he was caught in flagrante delicto smuggling narcotics into this country. If the present "war on terror" were genuine--and not just the latest excuse the conspirators are using to advance their cause of world government--wouldn't it make sense to invoke the Monroe Doctrine and take out Castro and Communist Cuba, the easiest place in the world for us to fight? Why confine a "war on terror" to Afghanistan, the hardest place in the world for us to fight? Notice that Castro has subjugated Cuba for 43 years, but the mainstream media, so quick to demonize a suspected dictator, say not a word of complaint.

So, it should surprise no one that sexy Jimmy went to Cuba and said such nice things about Castro. Carter has been advancing Communist purposes for years. Now ask yourself a question. Do you believe that Jimmy decided on his own to go to Cuba? Or did he consult in advance with President Bush? The trip paved the way for Bush's visit to South Florida to help his brother Jeb's bid for re-election, and his speech to expatriate Cubans about the embargo. Yes, Bush said that Castro would need to make some changes to lift the embargo. Among them would be a typically phony Communist election, no doubt supervised by Jimmy. But before the Carter trip and the Bush speech, the idea of cancelling the embargo was dead, no longer even discussed. Now, it's back. Jimmy's trip gave Bush the excuse to put the idea back on the table. In the interrogation rooms at the police station, the technique is known as "good cop/bad cop."

Typically, the usual suspects come together in the end. Remember that Bush, Sr. was a leader in both the Marxist Council on Foreign Relations that gave us Bush Jr.'s Condoleeza Rice, his National Security Adviser, and the secret, totalitarian Trilateral Commission that hired Jimmy Carter as President. The same people are running the show. Look for Bush/Carter to whipsaw the nation between them, in a scheme to lift the embargo on Cuba.

Alan Stang was, for two decades, a senior writer for the John Birch Society's American Opinion magazine, and was Robert Welch's closest confidant. A former talk-radio host, he is also the author of ten books, including, most recently, Perestroika Sunset, surrounding our Government's deception in the POW/MIA arena. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.

Typically, the usual suspects come together in the end. Remember that Bush, Sr. was a leader in both the Marxist Council on Foreign Relations that gave us Bush Jr.'s Condoleeza Rice, his National Security Adviser, and the secret, totalitarian Trilateral Commission that hired Jimmy Carter as President. The same people are running the show. Look for Bush/Carter to whipsaw the nation between them, in a scheme to lift the embargo on Cuba.

It's hard to be a bigger jackass than Carter, but the author of this article has succeeded.

This article is pathetic and an embarrassment. Carter had no power to change the text of the treaty unilaterally, which seems to be the basis of the charge (ie that he misled the senate). If this charge had any validity, why haven't all the right wing publications picked up on this previously? Carter is not a traitor, he is just misguided and doesn't get much fire power going per point of his IQ. This piece is a turd on the carpet of this site.

Carter is a traitor for different reasons than stated. His unseemly and increasingly frantic quest for the Nobel Peace Prize before he shucks his last peanut has driven him--time after time--to sell his country out.

His trip to North Korea is, IMHO, the most heinous of his numerous acts of perfidy.

--Boris

Please explain why tiny Cuba is a problem when massive Red China, which is now replacing more and more of our industrial capacity with its slave labor, is now a "most favored nation" and we even just offered to make that permanent?

"Carter is a traitor for different reasons than stated. His unseemly and increasingly frantic quest for the Nobel Peace Prize before he shucks his last peanut has driven him--time after time--to sell his country out."

I agree. Carter is an idiot and does his best to bad mouth America. But he doesn't have the intellect to be part of any conspiracy to take over the world. Hell, he couldn't even get reelected.

than he was when we first heard that a man named Jimmy was running for President of the United States. Yes, I know he hails from the South, but even Sleazy Bill--another traitor--doesn't call himself Billy.

Actually, former President Carter asked reporters to refer to him as James, but they ignored his request. Just goes to show, you have no control over what people call you, from birth to death. (regardless, Carter is an idiot)

He got attacked by a rabbit.

A rabbit.

Forget the trilateral commission, Cuba and all that, if rabbits can't stand the man then that's all the evidence I need.

Alan Stang can be reached at: stangfeedback@hotmail.com

Surely a relative of the Rev. Ivan Stang...

My brother is an U.S.A.F. JAG officer, and one of the last soldiers out of Panama prior to the Canal being turned over. He told me about how the rat bastard ChiComs had been buying up all the land they could on the Canal, and were all over the place. Gee, what do you think they're doing that for?

Because this dickweed hasn't been president in over 20 years, he's not often in the forefront of my mind. But I firmly believe he was a worse president than Clinton ever dreamed of and did far more damage to our country. Clinton was in it for himself, but Carter actually believed the crap he spewed - if we be nice, then other countries will be nice back to us. A--hole!

Actually, former President Carter asked reporters to refer to him as James, but they ignored his request.

Bullshit...
He always asked that he be called "Jimmy"
Always.
Every Georgian knows this.

In a short bio about him, this was mentioned. I saw the show on network TV years ago, but still after he was booted from office.

Perhaps I foolishly trusted the show at it's word. But I remember the remark clearly and even at my young age at the time it stuck with me (maybe becuase my sister wanted to be called Cindy, but my father wanted her called Cynthia).

Now, if you want to disagree with me, at least be civil about it.

maybe because my sister wanted to be called Cindy, but my father wanted her called Cynthia).

My father did the same thing to MY sister Cindy...no lie

Sorry if you thought I was being uncivil (not intended) but it used to be a BIG story when Carter was running that it was JIMMY...never James.
I can't imagine any story getting something so basic so wrong.

Hey Mr. Sea! Where did you come from? The moon? Where do you get this crap from? I'm just a professional sailor, but over the course of about twenty years, have made about 16 trips per year through the big ditch and was interested enough to learn the history and the then administration of the canal! The US never owned the Panama Canal. It was under lease dummy! You know; that's like when you rent your apartment! You don't get to keep it!

JIMMY CARTER: TRAITOR THE COMMUNISTS LOVE THEIR PAWN

And not a mention of Senator Henry Bellmon, Republican of Oklahoma.

While we are justifiably criticizing Carter The Communist for losing the Panama Canal,
it's only fair to let former Senator Bellmon have it, but good.

Which is sad...I like Bellmon as a two-time governor...but he made some sort
of quid pro quo deal with Satan when he voted to end US control over the Canal Zone.

Carter, like Clinton, is a failure looking for a legacy. History already looks at Carter as a joke for a president. He is mediocracy bordering on ineptitude with a smiley face.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.