Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[AZ] Green group lawsuit blocked forest thinning
Arizona Tribune ^ | 30 June, 2002 | MARK FLATTEN AND DAN NOWICKI

Posted on 06/30/2002 8:21:04 PM PDT by brityank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: brityank
I don't see that they missed anything.

I do.

They don't have a solution.

I do.

21 posted on 06/30/2002 10:27:11 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: brityank
The next law suit they file will be to prevent any salvage logging in these burned areas as they have in the "Megan fire" of Humboldt and Trinity counties. After thee years the trees are useless as fiber because of beetle damage and rot.

BTW, you can substitute any National Forest in the Article to see the same types of law suits.
22 posted on 06/30/2002 10:44:24 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
what these enviro-nazis don't understand is the simple fact that; if it is not farmed, mined, logged, or fished---it doesn't, for all practical purposes, exist.
Somewhere, somebody has to hit a lick and actually work. We can't ALL be "information" workers!
23 posted on 06/30/2002 11:01:42 PM PDT by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Thanks for the ping. Great article.
24 posted on 06/30/2002 11:11:20 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Where is the judge who will say, "I do not manage forests. I leave that to the Forest Service, which has been duly appointed to perform the function, and which has acquired expertise in doing so. I do not know fire management from Shinola. I am a member of the Judicial Branch, which has no authority under the Constitution to perform natural resource management."

Why do these judges think they have to rule on anything and everything brought before them?


25 posted on 06/30/2002 11:22:27 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: brityank
"The Forest Service did not adequately analyze impacts on the endangered birds such as the pygmy nuthatch, the yellow-bellied sapsucker and the northern goshawk."
Analysis complete...THEIR ALL DEAD!
27 posted on 06/30/2002 11:29:16 PM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Why do these judges think they have to rule on anything and everything brought before them?

From what I hear and can tell, money. You might ask Iconoclast2. He's been there more than any of us over these Pacific Northwest salmon lawsuits.

28 posted on 06/30/2002 11:29:33 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: brityank
At the end of a local TV interview, the father of a displaced family from the Rodeo Fire, looked at the camera, and asked, “Where’s the Spotted Owl now?”

Indeed.

If the Spotted Owl was too stupid to get out of the way of the 200 foot flames…then I say, “Spotted Owl…it’s what’s for dinner. I’ll take mine well done."

But I doubt our little feathered friend is as dumb as the EnviroNuts would have us think, and is fat and sassy sitting in a tree a few miles down the road, and prospering quite nicely, thank you very much.

No longer should we sit back and hope that the Sierra Club, or Center For Biological Diversity overlook "us" and file suit on some other development, or forest fire prevention project.

The time is right to go on the offensive.

If every State, County and Tribal Government, as well as every “Klamath Falls” and “Rodeo/Chediski” citizens group, were to bring multi-million dollar suits against these voodoo environmentalists, then they would get a taste of their own medicine and be litigated into oblivion, never to be heard from again.

Note to Matt Salmon, Republican Gubernatorial hopeful for the State of Arizona.

Unearth any kind of “wink and nod” from Arizona Attorney General Janet Napolitano, (A.K.A. Expected Democratic Nominee for Governor, A.K.A.Counsel to Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings) to any of these “Greenie Groups” and the keys to the mansion will be yours.

29 posted on 07/01/2002 12:05:25 AM PDT by crusher999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; AAABEST; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; brityank; editor-surveyor; ...
Senator Jon Kyl has lambasted the Southwest Center for Biodiversity in his statement at Show Low last week. Here is something from his website:

http://www.senate.gov/~kyl/#statmnt

"Environmentally-sound strategies such as forest thinning and controlled burns clear away small, dry, and disease-prone trees and underbrush that serve as kindling for fires and prevent healthy growth. Arizonans can see the results of such proper forest-management techniques firsthand. The White Mountain Fort Apache Indian Reservation, Mount Trumbell, and other places in our state prove that properly-thinned forests are not only healthier and fire-resistant, but much more attractive. "Yet standing in the way of these efforts are radical environmentalists who file litigation and seek to otherwise obstruct forest treatment. They would rather the forests burn than to see sensible forest management. As of last month, there were 5,000 legal challenges pending against the U.S. Forest Service, which devotes nearly 40 percent of its resources to defending against lawsuits and complying with environmental regulations. This is time and money taken away from fighting fires.

"Along with other Western Senators, I am proposing legislation shortly to establish an ecological research institute in Arizona that will work with land managers to implement forest-restoration treatments throughout the state. As it happens, my request for $1 million in federal funding for a pilot program to treat Apache-Sitgreaves through forest thinning was granted shortly before this wildfire broke out. We will work to fund more pilot programs throughout the state, because as long as we leave our forests untreated, we will guarantee catastrophic damage."

HOW TO CONTACT SEN. JON KYL

I welcome your comments and questions. You can get a message quickly to me by:

I would like to hear your thoughts and suggestions about this website. The online webmaster comment form will get your message directly to my webmaster.

Washington, D.C.
730 Hart Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4521
Fax: (202) 224-2207

Phoenix
2200 East Camelback, Suite 120
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3455
Phone: (602) 840-1891
Fax: (602) 957-6838

Tucson
7315 North Oracle Road, Suite 220
Tucson, Arizona 85704
Phone: (520) 575-8633
Fax: (520) 797-3232

 


30 posted on 07/01/2002 7:32:22 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing; farmfriend; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; poet; CyberAnt; HiJinx; ...
ping #30
31 posted on 07/01/2002 7:41:08 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
http://www.undueinfluence.com/southwes1.htm

Center for Biological Diversity
formerly Southwest Center for Biological Diversity

PO Box 710
Tucson, AZ 85702
Tucson AZ 85702-0710
TEL: 520.623.5252
FAX: 520.623.9797
email:
center@biologicaldiversity.org
Website: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/

Description: Anti-industry legal attack group bringing lawsuits against a wide spectrum of resource use companies, private property owners and against government to stop resource use.

Revenue and Expenses: Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2000

  Revenue     Expenses
Contributions $956,358
Government Grants $0
Program Services $123,727
Investments $29,799
Special Events $2,109
Sales $234
Other $0
 
Program Services $928,942
Administration $81,815
Other $102,337
Total Expenditures $1,113,094
Total Revenue $1,112,227   NET GAIN/LOSS $(867)

EIN: 85-0420285
Exempt since August 1994

Board of Directors
TODD SCHULKE, TREASURER LINDA WELLS, SECRETARY
KIERAN SUCKLING, PRESIDENT PETER GALVIN, DIRECTOR
ROBIN SILVER, CHAIR

Foundation grants to Center for Biological Diversity:

Foundation Name: The Wilburforce Foundation
Abstract: For Forest Protection Campaign
Amount: $50,000             Year Authorized: 2000

Foundation Name: S. J. & Jessie E. Quinney Foundation
Abstract: For general support
Amount: $10,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: The Homeland Foundation 
Abstract: For Colorado River Campaign
Amount: $30,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: Richard & Rhoda Goldman Fund
Abstract: For Glen Canyon Action Network
Amount: $15,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: Turner Foundation, Inc.
Amount: $85,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: Foundation for Deep Ecology
Abstract: For endangered species listing campaign
Amount: $20,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: Foundation for Deep Ecology
 Abstract: For Southwest Conservation Trust
Amount: $10,000             Year Authorized: 2000 

Foundation Name: Columbia Foundation
Abstract: For development of The Golden State Biodiversity initiative to use science and the law to protect imperiled species and habitats throughout California
Amount: $125,000             Year Authorized: 2000
Duration: 5-year grant 

Foundation Name: Foundation for Deep Ecology
Abstract: For Endangered Species Listing Campaign
Amount: $30,000             Year Authorized: 1999

Foundation Name: Turner Foundation, Inc.
Amount: $85,000             Year Authorized: 1998

32 posted on 07/01/2002 7:56:45 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: madfly; brityank
Thanks for the PING. I'm adding the western US states to the topic list so that others (like me) who missed the original post can see more of the underlying cause of this tragic fire.
33 posted on 07/01/2002 8:20:54 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Whoops!! Added Missouri instead of Montana. Sorry about that "Show Me" staters!
34 posted on 07/01/2002 8:23:12 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Why don't they just go back to the pre-80's era and consolidate into one group like they used to? You know, the old CPUSA (Communist Party of the United States of America). It would make it a lot easier for everyone to follow then.
35 posted on 07/01/2002 8:28:15 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: brityank; CedarDave; BOBTHENAILER; SierraWasp; farmfriend; Ernest_at_the_Beach; blackie
Yeah and their role models, the German Nazis were not guilty of any war crimes and crimes against humanity with their anti human agendas. (at least in their eyes)

It is time for some hard nosed lawyers to take these new Nazis, the Enviral Nazis into civil courts and hammer them for the damages that their agendas have caused.

Then, if there were criminal activities such as creation of bad science by the fed druids, use of federal employees to create their Druid agendas, and then to carry out their Druid agendas that resulted in these fires. Criminal suits and Rico suits against the Druid feds and Enviral Nazis Druids need to be instigated.
37 posted on 07/01/2002 9:20:33 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Stop the attacks by the wacko, extreme left-wing, enviro-nazis terrorist's on our Freedoms !!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Molon Labe !!

38 posted on 07/01/2002 9:52:57 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madfly; CedarDave; AAABEST; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; brityank; ...
Just a little math to ponder:

60' (timber fire break) times 5280' (mile) times 100 miles, divided by 43560 (sq ft in acre) equals 727.27 acres cleared.

At close to 500,000 acres burned to the ground, cleared, wasted and wiped out for at least 10-20years, I would call the trade-off quite good.

Bear in mind that 100 miles of a sixty foot timber break is only my guess as to what would be sufficient for a safety margin. Even if it's double or triple that, the tradeoff is more than good.

Then again, common sense does not exist with Enviro/nazi's!!!

39 posted on 07/01/2002 10:05:46 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Great point here, Bob.

Lets go with a 100 yard or 300' wide fire break.

That would mean 3636.35 acres cleared to save 500,000 acres.

3636/500,000 equals an investment of .727% of forest lands to save the 500,000 acres.

These enviral Nazis did not want these breaks as they would be intrusions into their druid sanctuaries and could be used as roads after the fire was over to harvest the dead trees, killed by the fires.

The reality is that these Enviral Nazis never want another tree harvested for our use. That includes dead trees from the fires that their agenda killed.
40 posted on 07/01/2002 10:16:36 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson