To: Mrs.O'Strategery
I kinda doubt if DW would let Feldman put Neil on the stand.DW already admitted the porn was his, trying to protect his son even then,IMO.
1,069 posted on
07/05/2002 6:40:44 PM PDT by
BARLF
To: BARLF
I agree. I think it was actually more important to have the computer expert Lawson prove that it could not have been DW's in some instances, and that it was iffy in others. People provide "alibis" for friends and relatives all the time--Lawson's testimony actually carried more weight than the son's admission would have, in my opinion.
To: BARLF
No, I didn't understand Brady's garbled answer either. There's so much I don't understand. Perhaps the pizza gang want to confuse everyone. It seems the only thing they can agree on is that they had pizza together in the kitchen. They can't even agree on who warmed it up!
My post on Neil was a major "duh" moment. I wasn't even thinking that he could take the fifth. I agree, there is no way DW would let Feldman put him on the stand. And I don't think Feldman would even suggest it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson