Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Founding Fathers could see us now
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com ^ | Thursday, July 4, 2002 | By JON HAHN

Posted on 07/03/2002 8:45:32 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Libertarianize the GOP
The Seattle PI is so far off the Socialist deep end...

Ah, the Seattle Pest Intelligentsia. On the other hand, they do publish on occasion the writings of Leonard Koppett (a very good baseball historian)...
41 posted on 07/04/2002 1:01:16 AM PDT by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
The Unjust Taxes only which led to the American Revolution took only 1% of the average income. . If the were to see the progressive income tax which sucks up to 50% of the average American income, you would see Capitol Hill overrun with men wearing tri corner hats and sharpened bayonets.

Aherrmm... To my amateur knowledge of history -- it was 3 percent. I do not know of a Revolution in history which ever occured over 1 percent... but in Early Capitalist days, 3 percent was a good chunk of your Net Profit.

In these modern, industrialized days, however, I should be quite content if the Government subsisted upon 3 percent.

Otherwise your post is correct.

42 posted on 07/04/2002 1:09:56 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The author crammed about half of the low-IQ socialist buzz words into a few paragraphs:

filthy-rich owners
extract obscene profits
huge profit
high tariffs
starving people
thousands of workers into the street

43 posted on 07/04/2002 1:16:50 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
If Founding Fathers could see us now

John Adams would denouce us for our Godless behaviour and for caving in to tyrannic Federalism.

Three weeks later the National Enquirer would run an expose on his weekend trist in Vegas with Hal Berry.

I'd still vote for him.

*grin*

44 posted on 07/04/2002 3:22:05 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Might the same Founding Fathers have been a tad more specific about a citizen's right to bear arms?

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Can't this author understand simple gammar and read simple english.

It's pretty clear to most people.

45 posted on 07/04/2002 4:11:43 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: christine11
And how would John Hancock react if, while he was drafting an official document, his computer began flashing a dreaded "blue screen" and error message before his whole system froze up and wouldn't allow him to store or even work off-line?

He should have known better than to run Windows Millenium Edition.

48 posted on 07/04/2002 5:15:04 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
They'd flip their powdered wigs if they could see the gaggle of misfits that "serve" their nation as congresscritters. One look at Sinthia Mckinney (Muslin Potentate) and the Smartass Sheila Jackass Lee would be enough to cause a reinstitution of slavery.

The present and past antics of Hitlery would cause voter disenfranchisement. Many traitors (one who served himself as president) and malcontents would be rounded up and executed by military firing squads.

In short, there would be massive reversals and internments with war being declared and swiftly carried out against all muslim nations. The religion would be banned in America and their temples razed. All adherents to this satanic religion would be deported or incarcerated.

It wouldn't take these founding fathers too long, but they would indeed put this country back in as close to its original shape as possible.

No more welfare or charity coming from the drastically downsized federal government. Drug addiction would be considered a serious offence against the citizenry both for user and seller resulting in death for both.

49 posted on 07/04/2002 5:54:07 AM PDT by elcaudillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Would these same Founding Fathers approve if they saw tax revenues for public education being channeled to private or parochial schools, or if they learned that large percentages of public education funds were used to transport students solely for the purpose of mixing races?

Well they probably wouldn't approve of tax revenues for public education at ALL!! Considering that before the War, the only hint of federally funded education was in the Northwest Ordinance and that public education did not exist, I imagine they'd be pretty POed. That's the problem with this nation of states. The revisionist history has taught us that the government has always taken care of us. I imagine there's an idiot or two out there that believes Social Security was around long before FDR. Or any federal police force? Anybody care to take a guess how long that's been around?

50 posted on 07/04/2002 5:57:34 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: christine11
Thanks for the ping.
51 posted on 07/04/2002 7:01:37 AM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Thank you for pointing out the very things that have been plaguing my brain while reading down this entire thread. Our founders would be appalled, all right! -- at US for allowing this to either happen or for allowing it to continue!!
52 posted on 07/04/2002 7:01:47 AM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
America or Amerika?
53 posted on 07/04/2002 7:06:04 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lawdog
If they could "see us now", they would probably need some heavy meds.

And they would be put in a federal prison on 'Kingpin' statutes. Major hemp growers you know, and were not opiates and cocca products popular in their day? ;-)

(Not directed at you personally.)

54 posted on 07/04/2002 7:16:27 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dtel
"...noone CAN be compelled to be a witness against himself."

Whoops, critical distinction. Double negative slipped by me.

55 posted on 07/04/2002 8:04:39 AM PDT by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KentuckyWoman
Do you s'pose that the framers of the Constitution might have set some limits on the power of Congress to borrow money on the national credit? Might they have been a little clearer on the subject of taxes? Or on the separation of church and state? Or on the war powers of the president?

And this right here. You and I both know EXACTLY when that started. Taxes? Before a certain time there weren't any. Oh, but with public education getting its roots in the same place you need taxes to pay for it. War powers of the President? I think they were absolutely clear about that, but hey they were absolutely clear about national banks too, but Federalists, Whigs, and later Republicans (the 19th and early 20th century ones) didn't care about that either.

56 posted on 07/04/2002 8:15:54 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Yet more proof (as if it was needed) that the left hasn't even a microsopic clue as to the motivations of our founders. To them, our founders were "revolutionaries", that is to say, socialists. The understanding goes no deeper.

Pathetic.

57 posted on 07/04/2002 8:26:53 AM PDT by Mr. Bungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
After shaking their collective heads in wondering how the republic they helped create got into its present state, the Founding Fathers would probably decry how their cherished freedom of the press has evolved for the most part into such media outlets becoming "mouthpieces" for the political persuasion that seeks to move government in the opposite direction from the Founders' original ideals.
58 posted on 07/04/2002 8:31:03 AM PDT by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
"If someone ever does figure out a way of reaching back to tap the minds of our Founding Fathers in more detail...

The Federalist"

Good luck. To the left, the Federalist papers simply don't exist. If leftists were ever to recognize their existence, they'd be forced to realize that most, if not all of their current positions are unconstitutional. No, they prefer the Constitution through the nuanced distortions of judges living centuries after the fact, a preference summarized well by (Moron)Gary Ackerman (D-NY) in a recent joust with Sean Hannity, when Hannity cited a particular passage in The Federalist to support an argument.

Ackerman said, "well, the courts decide the meaning of the constitution...we take an oath to uphold the Constitution, not the Federalist Papers."

Translated: "The Constitution means whatever I want it to mean, you ignorant apes."

59 posted on 07/04/2002 8:44:43 AM PDT by Mr. Bungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: christine11
If the Founding Fathers could see us now they'd want to tar and feather us and beat us all the way to the border and put a boot in our behinds to help us across
60 posted on 07/04/2002 9:09:22 AM PDT by sandmanbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson