Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2002 8:45:32 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Might the same Founding Fathers have been a tad more specific about a citizen's right to bear arms?
How much more specific than "shall not be infringed" can you get?

-Eric

64 posted on 07/04/2002 1:11:28 PM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Seattle Pseudo-Intellegencia strikes again.
67 posted on 07/04/2002 5:47:03 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
They would be apalled that the people who claim to defend our freedoms are more tyrannical than their worst nightmares. It's a given that the commie Democrats try to take away our freedoms, but when they saw what the other party had degenerated into, they would have to conclude that they designed it poorly. They changes they would likely make would preclude any group from screwing this up so quickly.

They would concider Clinton and Gore to be criminals, and Bush and company to be two bit tyrants.

70 posted on 07/05/2002 7:10:58 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson