[Pythagoras]

LOL Iraq must be destroyed because it is building "weapons of mass destruction"

Of course in the case of Israel it is simply ^^ bombs away. Utter hypocrisy.

[Pythagoras]

"Did you hear/read about this at a KKK meeting or in their newsletter?"

Welcome to the United States of Israel.

[jae471]

Saddam uses chem weapons against his own people the same week that they're made.

Israel has had the bomb for 35 years and hasn't used it once.

Do you see a difference?

Israel maintains a second-strike policy. So does the US, UK, Russia, France, Australia, Canada, India, and South Africa. Saddam wants first-stike power capability. Big difference.

[monkeyshine]

Utter hypocrisy

Only if you believe the pretext to be true, which it isn't.

[Quix]

I guess you see no linguistic, meaningful, significant, useful, functional difference between:

DEFENSIVE

vs

OFFENSIVE?

HOW would you like to be president of Israel responsible for her survival with their geography among sworn enemies who have been persistently destroying their civilian population for decades???

If you have that much trouble with the disctinction between defensive and offensive, I wouldn't want to be an Israeli citizen with you as president.

[roadcat]

"LOL Iraq must be destroyed because it is building "weapons of mass destruction"

Of course in the case of Israel it is simply ^^ bombs away. Utter hypocrisy."

I did'nt see any hypocracy - did Israel invade Kuwait and threaten an invasion of Saudi Arabia? No, it was Iraq! That's why we went to war with them and forced them to agree to get rid of WMD. If Israel had used WMD without just cause on another nation then you just know that the entire world would've wiped Israel off the map. To date Israel has not used nukes on anyone (yet). But Iraq has used their WMD arsenal, and are planning on using it against other nations.