Posted on 07/07/2002 10:32:44 PM PDT by hawaiian
Edited on 05/25/2004 2:46:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Al Gore took Iowa in 2000, but the Iowa Poll shows the president would win in a rematch.
President George W. Bush would rout Al Gore by more than 2 to 1 in Iowa, a state he lost in 2000, if a rematch of the historic election were held today, according to the latest Iowa Poll.
(Excerpt) Read more at dmregister.com ...
But they can vote...
He'd lose even bigger in Red Nation if he ran as the extreme commie he is on social issues than when at least in 2000 his handlers got him to shut up down here about stuff like Earth In The Balance. Can you imagine his 2004 campaign if he tried to sell himself as the senator who wrote that book only 12 years earlier?
Algore in his own words, 1992-2000 - including Earth In The Balance!
There'll always be a poly-sci academic to issue an apologia for the liberal candidate as sure as the sun will rise each day.
Hey Rhonda...you got it half right....it's because Bush is a HIMSELF A MAN OF CHARACTER AND VISION
He is the tree that is about to be cut down
Rhonda is at least able to step outside her standard thinking and actually acknowledge the tremendous depth and knowledge and character of the people advising, surrounding and helping our President lead this nation. Perhaps she will come to realize that it takes of man of character, vision and 'gravitas' to choose such a team. Your point was well taken.
Clinton chose a team composed only of those he could drive, manipulate, thrill and cajol into doing things I suspect they deeply regret. (At least I HOPE they do...chances are, they are much like their mentor else they would not have been there, including AL GORE.)
By the way, has Al Gore decided who he wants to be when he grows up, yet? I mean we know he wants to be president, but has he figured out who he IS? (Or like ol billy, does the very word 'is' produce confusion?)
Let me guess the title of the book.....
"How I invented the English language, the micro chip and the paper clip - in one afternoon!"
"Gas is bad - Green is good!"
"The untold secrets of the 'Lock box'!"
"The inside story of being a Slum Lord!"
"Funny money is the Best!"
"Authority - schmority!"
What ever the title, and non-content, it will get rave reviews I'm sure. DU.com is having an orgasm right about now.
LVM
i invented the dufus
yours,
albert gore, jr.
p.s. is my internet thing working out well for you?
I understand that Bush would win New York and California if the election were held today, too. Too bad those contrived scandals didn't work out for ya...
So, in the People's Republik of California, the President would only win by 7%?! There's still that many Gorons in Cali? Sheesh, they really are that f_cked up, aren't they? Goes to show that old Davis still has a good shot at winning there - I'm amazed that Condit didn't win there this time as well. Pretty soon the rest of us are going to need to fence that place off from the rest of this reality, or just let the Mexicans have it - it may turn out to be the best weapon we'd have against all the illegal immigration. (Note to Pres. Fox: Be careful what you wish for.)
WHAT ABOUT THE SENATE???
The last poll I saw showed Harkin at 49%, Ganske at 43% which isn't bad considering Ganske likely has a great deal of advertising ahead of him. If you read the FR Iowa boards you will see there is some animosity towards Ganske by many of the "far right" Repubs, some of whom are threatening to write in Bill Salier (who lost the GOP primary) or not vote at all. Although I do not agree with Ganske on several issues, I would think just about anybody is preferable to Tom Harkin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.