Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seeking New Light On TWA Flight 800
Insight Magazine ^ | July 8, 2002 | Jessica Davis

Posted on 07/09/2002 5:02:41 PM PDT by Swordmaker

The deadliest U.S. airline disaster prior to the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon was the July 17, 1996, midair explosion that destroyed TWA Flight 800 off the coast of Long Island, N.Y. Six years later, while the official investigation has been closed (or forever forgotten in "inactive pending" status), the nature of the explosion that killed the 230 passengers of the Paris-bound jumbo jet is very much on the radar of independent investigators. Indeed, investigators now have used the government's own regulations to petition the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for a reconsideration and modification of official findings.

Having spent more than two years and $40 million, federal authorities had concluded that the probable cause for the crash of Flight 800 was an explosion within the aircraft's center-wing fuel tank. The investigators admitted that neither the ignition source nor its location within the tank "could be determined from the available evidence."

On the sixth anniversary of the downing of the jumbo jet, the Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization (FIRO), a nonprofit international group made up of professionals, engineers, scientists, former crash investigators and survivors of those killed in the explosion, believe the evidence of what happened now is clear. Based on physical evidence and eyewitness accounts, both those considered during the investigation and many that were not considered, FIRO is convinced it can prove the official determination was wrong.

Tom Stalcup, a physicist who is chairman of FIRO, tells Insight that it was "during a meeting with former NTSB chairman Jim Hall that we became aware of the federal regulation that allows us to file the petition [for reconsideration]. Hall met with us and said if we had more questions we should send them to him. We did have more questions, but our letters went unanswered. Then Hall left the NTSB and Chairwoman Carol Carmody responded to our letters, basically saying that we weren't going to get answers to the questions — that it wasn't in anyone's interest even to correspond with us."

Having established that the NTSB was unwilling to cooperate with FIRO, Stalcup challenged the ruling under NTSB Regulation 845.41(a)) and put together a 20-page petition, plus 70 pages of attachments. "The criteria for the petition," explains Stalcup, "is that you have to show that, based on the evidence, their findings were erroneous and that there was evidence that wasn't considered — that there is new evidence. We met each of these criteria and made at least 100 other points."

The petition, which can be found at www.flight800.org, touches on nearly every aspect of the official investigation, including eyewitness statements, the cockpit voice recorder (CVR), radar analysis and recently declassified FBI reports about the wreckage. One of the major points of the petition cites "the Brookhaven [National Laboratory] report [that] was classified by the FBI as 'secret'" and never was made part of the NTSB public docket. It contains the laboratory results of wreckage items of "unknown origin" that were sent to an external laboratory for examination. The secrecy undermined the NTSB's ability to conduct a thorough analysis of the physical evidence. According to senior NTSB investigator Hank Hughes, group chairman of the Airplane Interior Documentation Group, "there are still unanswered questions concerning evidence sent for examination."

Stalcup says, "One of the interesting points in the 'secret' report is that there were investigators complaining that they hadn't been given enough information about the wreckage," saying there was "little forensic documentation or guidance on large-body-aircraft missile engagements."

According to Stalcup, "More than that, we have information that shows that 20 unusual .2-inch-diameter round pellets that were found in bodies were withheld from the NTSB but analyzed by the FBI and found to have been made of aluminum titanium matrix and other elements like zirconium, barium and cerium. These are pyrotechnics or incendiary devices, and the matrix structure of these objects is consistent with pellets used in antiaircraft missiles."

The FIRO chairman continues: "In fact, I found a quote in National Defense magazine that was referring to warheads that said 'pellets imbedded in titanium matrix' are used in antiaircraft warheads. The 'secret' [Brookhaven] report analysis concluded that the origin of the pellets is 'unknown' and that one of the pellets was submitted for identification because of its dissimilarity in appearance with TWA 800 debris. ...'"

While the petition winds its way through the bureaucratic maze at the NTSB, a lawsuit also has been brought by FIRO against the FBI for failure to release information duly requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Graeme Sephton, a member of FIRO, brought the action in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts because of the FBI's refusal to produce information. "The essence of the problem," explains Sephton, "is that Dr. Wetli [the Suffolk County Medical Examiner] will confirm that the FBI never shared with him any of the forensic information even though it was taken from him during autopsy, and it is he who must have all the available information to make the determination of the cause of death."

Sephton continues: "One of the reasons for a safety investigation is to find out what is flying around inside the plane so they can eliminate those things in another crash that maybe people will survive. What we're looking for is the list of shrapnel that shouldn't have been in the aircraft, and the hope is that the FBI will explain these unknown foreign bodies and ultimately bring us closer to finding out what caused the explosion."

Apparently the FBI didn't feel compelled to share this information with the NTSB investigators and, short of a court order, it is unlikely to be provided to FIRO. Stalcup says, "I'm not convinced that the petition will go anywhere. Not because it doesn't have merit, but because the NTSB doesn't have the guts to honestly search for and report the truth."

Kelly Patricia O'Meara is an investigative reporter for Insight magazine.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conspiracytheorists; firo; missile; tinfoilhats; twa800; twa800list; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Swordmaker
...Oh, my GOD, what's to fall out of the sky at us next...

...if the Democrats in Congress really do stop blocking Terrorism Expert and FoX News Channel Commentator ..MONSOUR IJAZ.. from testifying before the Joint Sept 11th Investigating Committee on National TV that...

...BILL CLINTON denied us ..OSAMA bin LADEN.. 3 times during the 1990's to be put in an American Jail for Trial...

...thus giving us all the Attacks of Sept 11th...???

21 posted on 07/10/2002 4:06:09 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
"CRAIG LIVINGSTONE '...........PAGE 169

The Secret Life Of Bill Clinton........Ambrose Evans Pritchard.........

Why did the two bozos go to see Vince........ and lose one of their sets of keys???????????? READ IT!

And then they had to leave in ONE car...............We must get this guy to work for G.W.

22 posted on 07/10/2002 2:54:56 PM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus; _Jim
Bump! Oh where oh where can you be?

Unmask yourselves you lying commie b**star**!

Or better, sit down and shut up!
23 posted on 07/13/2002 1:30:05 PM PDT by The Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
bump for the truth!!
24 posted on 09/02/2002 2:48:05 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
BTTT
25 posted on 09/05/2002 4:05:56 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump for New Light Truth!!
26 posted on 09/07/2002 1:50:33 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ain't no static spark blew up no TWA-800 jetliner!!
27 posted on 09/10/2002 11:57:22 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
28 posted on 09/10/2002 12:59:10 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
29 posted on 09/10/2002 1:03:42 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Patience, timestax. All things will be revealed in time.

The real problem is that the TRUTH, once exposed, will not be seen. Pity them who have eyes and will not see.
Gonna need a whole lot of pity, though, cause there will be a whole lot of people choosing to remain blind.
30 posted on 09/10/2002 1:13:52 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Patience

Easier said then done...

31 posted on 09/10/2002 1:39:38 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Always. And is it very likely even though the truth may come out, those responsible will suffer no consequences.
At least worldly consequences.
32 posted on 09/10/2002 2:38:30 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
bump
33 posted on 10/20/2002 11:46:21 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
34 posted on 10/21/2002 11:03:56 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
bump
35 posted on 10/21/2002 12:48:25 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: japaneseghost
bump
36 posted on 10/21/2002 12:51:35 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
bump
37 posted on 10/21/2002 1:47:22 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: timestax
A "shoebomber" maybe??!
38 posted on 10/21/2002 1:57:13 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
can anybody say=shoebomber ??!!
39 posted on 10/21/2002 2:33:41 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acehai
bump
40 posted on 10/21/2002 2:35:35 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson