Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nomination is Gore's for the taking.
Chicago Sun Times ^ | July 10, 2002 | Steve Neal

Posted on 07/10/2002 5:30:37 AM PDT by Quilla

Al Gore has decided to make another run for the presidency, and his renomination by the Democrats in 2004 is inevitable.

He could very well be the next president of the United States.

Gore, who took a year and a half leave from national politics, is back by popular demand. He is the clear choice of Democratic voters as their party's '04 nominee against President Bush.

With a shaky economy and Bush's approval ratings dropping, Gore should be formidable in the '04 general election. He won the popular vote by more than 700,000 votes in 2000 while losing the Electoral College ballot by a single vote.

Despite Bush's stern words against corporate greed, he has possible exposure on this issue. There are strong indications that Bush may have enriched himself as the result of insider information. Vice President Dick Cheney is also vulnerable on this issue.

When the voting public is angry with the power elite, it's usually good for the Democrats. Gore senses that his party has a powerful issue that could win back the presidency.

Two other Democrats, Andrew Jackson and Grover Cleveland, lost the presidency while winning the popular vote. Four years after their respective losses, Jackson and Cleveland captured the White House. History could repeat itself in 2004.

Bush, whose popularity got a temporary boost from the events of 9/11, could still be a one-termer. He is the fourth president elected without a plurality of the popular vote. None of the other three won a second term.

The Democratic nomination is Gore's for the asking. If the Democrats have a crowded field, Gore will be even tougher to beat. According to a recent national Democratic poll, Gore led seven potential rivals with 46 percent of the vote.

Senators John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina have been more active than Gore in raising funds for their '04 Democratic presidential bids. When second-quarter reports are made public this week, it's possible that Gore may have less money on hand than several '04 Democratic hopefuls.

But Gore has major advantages over the Democratic field. He is the largest vote-getter in the party's history and is the only Democratic candidate with a national political base. Kerry and Edwards are bright and capable but unknown outside of their respective regions.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), the only potential rival who could have seriously contested Gore in the primaries, set the stage for his renomination by removing herself from contention. Clinton is interested in the vice presidential nomination and would be an exciting choice for the Democratic Party.

Clinton recently met with Geraldine Ferraro, who made history in 1984 as the first woman nominated for the vice presidency by a major political party.

Another possibility, which Gore has discussed, is to run as a team in the primaries with Sen. Joseph Lieberman, his 2000 running-mate. At the very least, Lieberman will be on Gore's short list of potential running mates.

House minority leader Dick Gephardt and Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, both of whom have explored '04 presidential bids, are expected to abandon those plans in the wake of Gore's decision. If Gore goes on to win the presidency, he will do better if Gephardt and Daschle retain their current leadership positions.

Edwards could strengthen the '04 Democratic ticket. The North Carolinian is the first Southern Democrat in two decades to unseat a Republican senator.

A Democratic president has never been elected without carrying a Southern state. Gore, who is from Tennessee, got shut out in this critical region in 2000. In 1948, Harry Truman of Missouri chose Alben Barkley of Kentucky as his running mate. In 1992, Clinton of Arkansas chose Gore. Both of these tickets did well in Southern and border states and went on to win the general election. A Gore-Edwards combination could split the South and recapture the White House for the Democrats


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: algore; electionpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
What is this guy smoking?
1 posted on 07/10/2002 5:30:37 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Quilla; RedWing9; BillyBoy
You forgot the MANDATORY BARF ALERT that is supposed to be attached to anything written by Steve Neal.
2 posted on 07/10/2002 5:33:26 AM PDT by TheRightGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Al Sharpton will be putting Algore through the wringer next time around. Watch the Demmycrat primary debates and you will see Algore drenched in sweat.
3 posted on 07/10/2002 5:35:18 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
It never ceases to amaze me that people as out of touch with reality as this author are on the payrolls of major U.S. newspapers.
4 posted on 07/10/2002 5:38:16 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRightGuy
My sincerest apologies - BARF ALERT. (At least I didn't post a picture of the wooden one.)
5 posted on 07/10/2002 5:38:22 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"Nomination is Gore's for the taking"

If this is true, it is indicative that the Democrats do not view their odds as good, otherwise they would fight like the cats and dogs that they are.
6 posted on 07/10/2002 5:39:45 AM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
It is amazing. He claims Bush's poll numbers are dropping when in fact they are at unprecedented levels.
7 posted on 07/10/2002 5:40:53 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Bush approval numbers dropping ? Must have been a Sun Times scoop.
8 posted on 07/10/2002 5:41:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
If we have a Bush-Gore rematch and Bush takes it in a landslide, will the whiners finally SHUT UP?
9 posted on 07/10/2002 5:42:04 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Gore, who took a year and a half leave from national politics, is back by popular demand.

LOL.

10 posted on 07/10/2002 5:46:49 AM PDT by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
I'm just hoping that we'll se the "real" Al Gore next election. His staff apparently thought he was muzzled by his handlers and spinmeisters last go-round (which was affirmed by his multiple debating personalities), and they're urging him to let it all hang out this time.

Imagine, Al on the podium doing his inimitable racebaiting; slandering the Founding Fathers; promoting the Kyoto treaty and his other insane environmental views; supporting reparations; encouraging feminism, abortion, and promiscuity; touting more stringent gun control measures; etc.

Al's "real" views are no doubt compatible with the hard core lefties who slouch through Harvard Square (and the Cornell campus?). But that's about it. The Red Zone will certainly get larger next time around.

11 posted on 07/10/2002 5:54:20 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Obviously, Mr. Neal has just come out the coma he went into on the day of Bushs' innauguration.

Poor boy... maybe he didn't see Al and Tipper on TV this weekend... so pathetic!

Al kooked like Willy Loman on a bad day and “Tipper” was stoked-up on “roofies”.

If Gore doesn't go away on his own, the DNC will take care of him like Joe Pesci in “Good'fellas”.

12 posted on 07/10/2002 5:56:17 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Its not so much the canidate that runs as it is the people they bring in with them. We have a good staff running the country now, why mess it up with the kind we had in the last administration. The difference is we now have professionals compared to the Clinto era amateurs. Gore will only be the sacificial lamb. As one student boasted that he voted for Gore 5 times in the last election one can only imagine how many legal votes he actually received. The popular vote claim I believe is a myth if you deduct the multiple voters, the dead ones, "dimpled" chads, and floating voting machines.
13 posted on 07/10/2002 5:56:55 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Slandering the founding fathers? Shoot, he can't even recognize their displayed busts where touring their homes.
14 posted on 07/10/2002 5:57:16 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
This is the funniest line to me:

Bush, whose popularity got a temporary boost from the events of 9/11, could still be a one-termer

Temporary, how does the highest sustained approval ratings of any President equal a "temporary boost."

15 posted on 07/10/2002 5:58:03 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
I also believe algore, the little wooden boy, will be the next demoratic candidate for President. He will run on a tired mantras of "Bush Stole the Election in 2000" and "9-11 was all Bush’s fault, instead of making nice to the rab murders, he made them mad so they attacked us". He will pick a female running mate, maybe even sen. Billary.

He will lose this election bid as well.

It will be all the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracies" fault. But, if your algore, chairman Mao is a right winger, so that makes sense.

16 posted on 07/10/2002 6:00:35 AM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
I'll say it over and over....

It is way too early to count HillC out. She wants that position so badly, she's foaming at the bit.

Do not underestimate her, her political machine, her appeal to Democrats--and the media.

My bet right now is that she will run. A decision to wait until 2008 holds too many precarious unknowns that could prove unfavorable to her. She can't afford to wait that long.

She sees herself in much the same position as BillC did in early 1991, but she has a lot more advantages than hubby did. He was an unknown, third-rate politician from a small Southern state who had the audacity to challenge a popular, war-winning, sitting President. He won.

HillC is not unknown, is a Senator from a heavily populated state, and has the audicity to challenge a popular, war-fighting, sitting President.

And, she is a much more formidable, cunning, determined foe than her hubby was.

If you listen for a moment, you can hear the wheels of her political machine grinding overtime. Do not underestimate her. Poo-poo her as a potential candidate and we very well might have a Madam President being sworn in January 20, 2004.
17 posted on 07/10/2002 6:00:37 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
If the Dem's nomination is Algore's for the taking, Algore will do a Bobdole and promptly tank.
18 posted on 07/10/2002 6:00:48 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
"Nomination is Gore's for the taking"

If this is true, it is indicative that the Democrats do not view their odds as good, otherwise they would fight like the cats and dogs that they are.

I'd phrase it as: The Nomination is Gore's for the having.

19 posted on 07/10/2002 6:01:05 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
It's just like Reno in Florida. She can't win, they know she can't win, but what can they do, forbid her to run.

I'm sure the same thing with Gore, they either are going to let him run as someone mentioned, a sacrificial lamb, figuring nobody could beat Bush. Or, they can't help but let him run, since he's put himself in the ring and to deny him the chance might turn off some Dem voters.

By the way, if you click on the source, Mr. Neal's email link is happily provided. I just emailed him and thanked him for providing me with a good laugh.

20 posted on 07/10/2002 6:07:58 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson