Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror and Denial at LAX
New York Post | July 9, 2002 | Daniel Pipes

Posted on 07/10/2002 8:48:49 AM PDT by 1bigdictator

Terror & Denial [at LAX]

by Daniel Pipes New York Post July 9, 2002 http://www.danielpipes.org/article/431 http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/52004.htm

On the 4th of July, an Egyptian immigrant to the United States who believes in wild conspiracy theories about Jews, is known for his great "hate for Israel," and has possible ties to al Qaeda, armed himself to the teeth and assaulted the Israeli airline counter at Los Angeles International Airport, killing two.

It is obvious why Hesham Mohamed Ali Hadayet targeted Jews in a highly visible place on so prominent a date: to engage in terrorism against Israel.

But one important institution - the U.S. government - claims not to know Hadayet's goals. An FBI spokesman has said that "there's nothing to indicate terrorism." Another FBI official said of Hadayet: "It appears he went there with the intention of killing people. Why he did that we are still trying to determine." Possible causes named include a work dispute and a hate crime.

Sure, law enforcement should not jump to conclusions, but this head-in-the-clouds approach is ridiculous. It also fits a well-established pattern. Consider three cases of terrorism in the New York City area: Rashid Baz, a Lebanese cab driver with a known hatred for all things Israeli and Jewish, armed himself to the teeth in March 1994 and drove around the city looking for a Jewish target. He found his victims - a van full of Hassidic boys - on the Brooklyn Bridge and fired a hail of bullets against them, killing one boy.

And how did the FBI classify this crime? As "road rage." Only because the murdered boy's mother relentlessly fought this false description did the bureau finally in 2000 re-classify the murder as "the crimes of a terrorist."

Ali Hasan Abu Kamal, a Palestinian gunman hailing from militant Islamic circles in Florida, took a gun to the top of the Empire State building in February 1997 and shot a tourist there.

His suicide note accused the United States of using Israel as its "instrument" against the Palestinians, but city officials ignored this evidence and instead dismissed Abu Kamal as either "one deranged individual working on his own" (Police Commissioner Howard Safir) or a "man who had many, many enemies in his mind" (Mayor Rudolph Giuliani).

Gamil al-Batouti, an EgyptAir copilot, yelled "I put my faith in God's hands" as he crashed a plane leaving Kennedy airport in October 1999, killing 217. Under Egyptian pressure, the National Transportation Safety Board report shied away from once mentioning Batouti's possible terrorist motives. And despite all the "world-has-changed" rhetoric following the horrors of last September, Western officialdom continues to pretend terrorism away.

Damir Igric, a Croat immigrant from the former Yugoslavia, used a boxcutter to slash the neck of a Greyhound bus driver in Tennessee last October, causing the bus to roll over, killing six passengers and himself. Although this bus-hijacking scenario echoed similar attacks by Palestinians on Israeli buses, the FBI immediately classified it "an isolated incident" and not an act of terrorism. The media attributed the violence to post-traumatic stress syndrome.

Hassan Jandoubi, an Islamist with possible connections to al Qaeda, had started working at the AZF fertilizer factory in suburban Toulouse, France, just days before a massive explosion took place there last Sept. 21. This, the worst catastrophe ever in a French chemical plant, killed Jandoubi and 29 others, injured 2,000, destroyed 600 dwellings, and damaged 10,000 buildings.

The autopsy revealed that Jandoubi was wearing two pairs of trousers and four pairs of underpants, which the coroner compared to what is worn by "Islamic militants going into battle or on suicide missions." Also, the chemical plant was processing ammonium nitrate, a stable chemical that requires a substantial infusion of energy to explode.

Ignoring these signs, the French authorities declared there was "no shred of evidence" of the explosion being a terrorist act and ruled it an accident. They even prosecuted two publications merely for calling Jandoubi a "radical Islamist," making them pay tens of thousands of dollars in fines to Jandoubi's heirs, a mosque and a Muslim organization for their "defamation" of Jandoubi. Work dispute, hate crime, road rage, derangement, post-traumatic stress, industrial accident ... these expressions of denial obstruct effective counterterrorism. The time has come for governments to catch up with the rest of us and call terrorism by its rightful name.

To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/dplist Daniel Pipes sends out a mailing of his writings approximately twice per week.

To comment on the article, please go to http://www.danielpipes.org/article/431#comment Most articles are also available online at: http://www.DanielPipes.org

To receive television alerts, event invitations, lecture summaries, and news releases from the Middle East Forum, please sign up for the MEFnews mailing list at: http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/mefnews Please note: these do not duplicate the DPlist mailings (such as this one). Also, you are invited to visit the MEF site at: http://www.meforum.org


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: appologists; hadayet; hadyet; islamist; israel; jew; laxshooter; liberal; media; muslim; terrorcoverups; terrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I am saddened by conservatives attempting to allay the fears of terrorism (see, the Matt Drudge perspective on this event), in an attempt to counter-balance Liberal's "the sky is falling-- ergo, Bush must be responsible for any domestic terror" mentality, portraying the LAX attack as something less than another example of Arab sponsored terrorism. Perhaps not every American need fear as a result of this recent terror attack since it obviously targeted Jews.

This perspective is not tolerable for a conservative! Are we turning into the French? Where we broadly define acts of terror unless the victims happen to be Jewish? Remember French ideologues dismissed the burning of Synagogues and beating of Jews there recently as "isolated and understandable" acts by Arabs who "justifiably" were reacting to the "Jewish Terrorist State".

1 posted on 07/10/2002 8:48:49 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: 1bigdictator
bump
3 posted on 07/10/2002 8:59:28 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
bump
4 posted on 07/10/2002 9:00:41 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Your observation is correct but I'll go one step further and state that many otherwise clear-headed conservatives have become so skiddish about labeling acts of wrongdoing (formerly called sin)what they are for fear of being called "right-wing nuts.

Many of these people have witnessed what has happened to people of principle standing up for the truth - witness Franklin Graham, who stated that Islam is not a religion of peace!
Even President Bush distances himself from those statements, which is a disappointment. However, politicians only care about getting re-elected and never about standing on principle, whether Republican or Democrat.

5 posted on 07/10/2002 9:06:04 AM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
George Bush has the principles to command the right position in this war on Arab-backed terror. But, to your point, can a President exercise his principles into moral and sound domestic and foriegn policy-- and survive the onslaught from the liberal press? I don't know. Damn the election in 2004 and do the right thing!

Bush need only worry about swing voters-- and since these voters don't reflexively vote Democrat, let's give them a modicum of credit for being rational and sensible. If I were in Bush's shoes I'd expose the Charade of all the soveriegn arab nations who hold the Palistinian issue out as a red-herring meant to deflect attention away from Muslim-State sponsored terrorism-- "Read My Lips" were going into Iraq yesterday, or as soon as Rumsy feels were prepared to accomplish the job.

6 posted on 07/10/2002 9:31:04 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: michellcraig
I share your frustration with our government, but I blame the media moreso. The liberal spin and context built into reporting on events drives the polititians into believing the liberal spin represents American attitudes and views on issues. Polititians cater to the media.
7 posted on 07/10/2002 10:05:25 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Excuse me, but what the heck is this?
The autopsy revealed that Jandoubi was wearing two pairs of trousers and four pairs of underpants, which the coroner compared to what is worn by "Islamic militants going into battle or on suicide missions."
On second thought, maybe I don't want to know.
8 posted on 07/10/2002 10:26:53 AM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Hmmm ....

I'm thinking about inventing a "double trousers detector", or a "multiple underpants monitor" to be used by airport security.

9 posted on 07/10/2002 10:30:17 AM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abwehr; American in Israel; AppyPappy; aruanan; ASTM366; BenF; BlueLancer; Clinton's a rapist; ...
A mega ping and a question ...

Have any of you guys ever heard of such a thing (see post #8), and could you explain the rationale?
10 posted on 07/10/2002 10:33:37 AM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Already posted here. and first here.

 

And w/r to the media, yes, see "Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism"

11 posted on 07/10/2002 10:35:51 AM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watchin
They also tend to shave off all their body hair, shower and bathe like crazy, etc.

It's part of getting ready for the 72 virgins who they are sure are waiting one microsecond away on "the other side".

12 posted on 07/10/2002 10:37:52 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: watchin
re #10 & #8 ... I haven't ever heard of anything like this, nor could I even begin to guess the rationale.

Must be some esoteric suicide/Islam thing.

13 posted on 07/10/2002 10:38:52 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: watchin
I know that the Arab militants who concoct the homicide belts in thier homemade labratories sometimes wear multiple layers of clothing to protect themselves from burns while they mix the chemicals.... but on a suicide mission?

Perhaps they want to have on clean panties for the groupies at CNN who rejoice at publishing photos which glamorize homicide bombers... as they know it will make Ted Turner happy if he believes he can swell the ranks of terrorists willing to attack innocent Israelis.

14 posted on 07/10/2002 10:42:13 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
It's part of getting ready for the 72 virgins who they are sure are waiting one microsecond away on "the other side".

Errr.. four pairs of underwear to get ready for the virgins??

I guess I don't want to know!!

15 posted on 07/10/2002 10:46:58 AM PDT by alley cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: alley cat
They believe that they are protecting their private parts in some way. I know it doesn't make sense, but there it is.
16 posted on 07/10/2002 10:49:45 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Okay, okay - I'm trying to stop laughing here ...

Why would they want to be wearing two pair of pants and four pair of underpants when they meet their 72 virgins?

This cult is just too bizarre. They'd be the laughingstock of the world if they weren't so murderously serious.

17 posted on 07/10/2002 10:49:49 AM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: watchin
Bizarre is the least of it. Mohammed was the most successful cult inventor in history by far. (That's why he made them pray 5 times a day: control. They can see who is "slipping" and get them back on track.) In Islam, every daily motion is dictated down to exactly how to wipe your bottom.

Nothing is left up to the individial, not even how to bathe and dress before committing mass murder and suicide.

18 posted on 07/10/2002 10:54:56 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, received his US citizenship under 245I, the Legal Immigration and Family equity Act signed by President Clinton. This Act allows illegal aliens to gain citizenship while in the US illegally.
19 posted on 07/10/2002 10:57:06 AM PDT by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Davis FR
Just when you think the Clinton legacy can't descend any lower... you learn more about the ongoing harm his policies and vision for America have had on our society.
20 posted on 07/10/2002 11:03:19 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson