Posted on 07/11/2002 3:12:29 AM PDT by kattracks
DEMOCRATS SMELL blood at the White House, and they are moving in for the kill with startlingly vicious ferocity. So much for bipartisanship, unity and putting country before party.
There is a lot to be said for having a loyal opposition. The minority party’s duty is to keep the majority honest. However, there are limits of common decency and good taste. At least there used to be.
President George W. Bush released his corporate accountability proposals earlier this week, some of which were adopted from a plan being pushed by Senate Democrats. Bush’s plan is quite good. It could use some tweaking, including adding another one or two ideas from the Democrats’ proposal, but overall it would make corporate fraud more difficult to commit and get away with. Did Democratic leaders acknowledge this and pledge to work with the President to fashion the best possible plan?
No, they slammed the President as hard as they could, accusing him of putting forth a weak proposal because he is in the back pocket of big corporations.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe called Bush’s plan “toothless.”
“All bark and no bite,” said Michigan Rep. John Conyers Jr.
Really? Toothless? No bite at all, even though it increases prison time for corporate fraud and includes portions of the Democrats’ own plan?
“A lack of leadership,” said Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut. Dodd, by the way, actually is in corporations’ back pockets. In 1995 he fought for legislation to limit lawsuits from shareholders who want to sue companies for fraud.
Though Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont has a corporate responsibility bill, it is not displayed on the Democratic National Committee’s Web site. Instead, the DNC posts vitriolic comments from chairman McAuliffe accusing President Bush of corporate wrongdoing when he was on the board of Harken Energy but giving no substantive rebuttal of Bush’s plan.
Democrats are obviously more concerned about scoring cheap political points than in quickly crafting legislation to tighten laws governing corporate behavior. And all the while they are pretending to be acting in the best interests of the country. Talk about a lack of ethics.
Terry McAuliffe should go back under his rock and stay very, very quiet.
Add this to my list of "Reasons why I'm not a Republican".
Case in point: Larry Klayman's Judicial Watch sued Clinton & Co. many times over obstruction of justice and corruption, but big media didn't report any of it, except maybe to note JW was a right-wing group. Yesterday, JW sued Cheney over Halburton, and NBC had it as story two on their Nightly News.
I'm no marketing genius, but it seems to me that short, to the point, (by that, I mean blunt) statements generally get air time and get into the minds of the populace.
The Republicans have all kinds of ammo. Short partyline statements on the Sunday shows and every other time a camera is pointed at them, statements that name names and point fingers, that point out McCauliffe's Global Crossing past or Dasshole's record and his wife's lobbying connections, Enron's C.E.O's connections to the Democrat party, etc. might be a place to start. Pointed, personal, but factual. Turn the interviews around. Ask the interviewers why it isn't in the news or being investigated. Ask about the hypocracy. Be nice, but rub their noses in it. Ask the questions every one of us would ask if we had the chance. With a face like that of an angel ask "Is it because you are a Democrat that you don't investigate Global Crossing, or Dasshole's wife's efforts?" Missed opportunities!
The truth is on their side, on our side. These feeble efforts you talk about only keep the party faithful, faithful.
I saw Klayman on CNN too, where suddenly the "right-wing attack group" is being described as an "ethics" group or a "Washington-based watchdog group"...amazing, eh ?? How many suits did this idiot file against Clinton and his cronies...and why weren't these talked about on CNN ?? Hmmmmm......can you say "BIAS" boys and girls ?? Sure you can...
The FBI raid may also be a sign that the reported no prosecution deal for the Clintons, demanded by Democrat leaders as the price for President Bush getting some of his legislative agenda implemented, is beginning to unravel - since Democrats seem to have kept little if any of their part of the bargain.
FBI Raids Hillary's Warehouse in Whitewater Deja Vu
A Bush administration insider has privately leaked word that a deal was struck between Democratic congressional leaders and the Bush White House not to prosecute Bill and/or Hillary Clinton on an array of charges related to the Pardongate scandal, Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly claimed Friday on his nationally syndicated "Radio Factor" show.
O'Reilly said that according to his source, "Basically, they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any [legislation] passed in four years."
O'Reilly: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate
Fox News pointed out that little inconsistancy. Which kind of takes the wind out of your defense of Republicans. Fox News would report a Republican calling for support of our President during war and demonstrating that Democrats have been attacking Bush since September 11th. Fox hasn't reported it because it hasn't happened, or happened enough.
I think you are right. We Texans pride ourselves on being tough and he won over the majority of Texas Dems, even Bob Bullock. I just don't think Bush was prepared for what the U.S. Congressional Dems are doing to him, they are more ruthless than the Texas Dems could ever be and they have no conscience when it comes to power grabbing.
You know, I actually wish you were right, but sadly, you're dead wrong. Fox News is the ONLY fair big media outlet in a sea of leftist pink. I think most folks here know when I say big media, I'm referring to ABCCBSNBCCNNPBSMSNBC and Wash Post, NYT, LAT, Gannet, AP, Reuters, BBC, AFP and a host of others. Fox is a small breeze blowing against the gale of leftist big media. And that's why it's sad. I truely wish Fox News had many more viewers, and the others at least tried to be fair.
Incidently, just so you're not confused, I'm not defending Repulbicans, but rather conservatives. Leftist big media loves liberals/leftists, and hates conservatives. While most Republicans are more conservatives than the Democrats, it isn't always so. You and I might readily see a difference between conservatives and Republicans (especially RINOs), but leftist big media think (or should I see feel) conservatives=Republicans/Republicans=conservatives.
In case you need reminding, the point I made was that Brit Hume of Fox News mentioned that the only air time (other than Fox News) Judicial Watch has ever received is when they went after Cheney and his Haliburton connection. Do you have any examples of Republicans calling for unity with President Bush and pointing out how Democrats have been attacking him steadily since September 11th? No. Because they haven't, otherwise Fox would air it.
Then you cry this sad song about Fox in a sea of liberal...which is true. But, it seems that you are unaware of the impact that Fox has had on CNN, MSNBC, etc. If I were a politician, I would refuse to talk to all networks except Fox and decline by saying, "I have no desire to be ambushed by a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party."
Liberal politicians try to discredit Fox in order to preserve the liberal bias that favors them, why is it unreasonable to expect conservatives to pressure the liberal bias that hurts their agenda?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.