Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Before the attack fest of Perry loyalists starts, let me say this: Perry's opponent Tony Sanchez is a left wing extremist who I would never support for any public office in Texas. I will likely vote for Perry this november as what is increasingly fitting the mold of a lesser-of-two-evils campaign, but will do so holding my nose and with a giant asterisk noting that Perry leaves much to be desired as a candidate. I say this as a _former_ staunch Perry supporter who actively campaigned to elect him Lt. Gov. in 1998 and intended to do the same this year. As for his job performance and politics, quite frankly I am DISGUSTED with him and consider him to be a full fledged RINO at this point.

This is not due simply to the platform thing. That is simply the latest. I am talking about Perry's track record, which has been disturbing for quite some time. Just a few of the bigger highlights that come to mind:

- Perry signed the Democrat-passed Texas Hate Crimes Law in 2001.

- Perry appointed a liberal Democrat state representative as his first Texas Secretary of State. That democrat, Henry Cuellar, used his Perry-appointed position of Texas SoS as a springboard to mount a DNC-backed challenge to U.S. Representative Henry Bonilla. Bonilla is a conservative Republican congressman who has successfully held a marginally Democrat district along the Rio Grande for the last decade. Cuellar is his biggest Democrat challenger since he first won the seat.

- Perry's blown through the budget surplus he inherited with massive new state spending from the last legislative session.

- Perry campaigned for and passed a state constitutional amendment to provide millions of dollars in taxpayer funded infrastructure development to illegal immigrant settlements along the American side of the Rio Grande.

And now he's spitting on our Republican platform!

I'll concede that the Texas GOP has a very conservative platform and could reasonably understand Perry differing from it on a few planks such as the UN one (even though I'd personally prefer he did not). But some of these are CORE REPUBLICAN ISSUES that he is opposing! Perry flat out declared his opposition to the heart of the platform! He opposes us on:

- overhauling the tax system
- repealing the minimum wage
- eliminating affirmative action in government contracting
- Shifting education regulatory power from the bureaucrat Texas Education Agency to the elected State Board of Education
- establishing strictly merit-based state college admission procedures
- ending bilingual education
- sentencing without parole for repeat felons
- ending the Motor Voter vote fraud scheme

Most if not all of these are core conservative republican issues, and Rick Perry just publicly announced his opposition to every one of them!

Add that onto hate crimes, big spending, and his other liberal behavior in office, and I don't think it can be denied that Perry is a RINO.

I know this is an election year and realize I will probably be criticized by the "party loyalty at all costs" crowd for speaking out against Perry. But that's fine with me. My speaking out against Perry constitutes nowhere near the display of blatant disloyalty to ones own party shown by Perry himself both today and in the past.

Perry's behavior should be cause for concern for anybody living in Texas, especially Republicans. He is facing a strong challenge this year which we cannot afford to lose. But if it is lost, it will not be due to Tony Sanchez's merits. The republican majority in Texas will not vote for Tony Sanchez. They simply won't show up to vote in the strong numbers of the past with the reason being the absence of a worthy Republican candidate to fight for.

Flame or comment away.

1 posted on 07/13/2002 1:09:01 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: GOPcapitalist
Great post. Perry is certainly not a conservative. He is barely a republican. Having heard him speak in person, I know why he was once a demonrat. But to get to where he is now, he had to change parties. If Sanchez were'nt the flat out leftist/socialist he is, Perry would hardly be more conservative.

While Perry was a dem back in the 80's, he supported the Gore monster in his initial presidential runs and in some of his environmental views...need we say more?

2 posted on 07/13/2002 1:16:19 AM PDT by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Flame or comment away.

You're right. He isn't a very attractive candidate. But given the demographic realities of the Brave New Texas and the existing slate of candidates, what are we to do? And make no mistake...those nasty demographic realities are only going to get worse...

3 posted on 07/13/2002 1:27:02 AM PDT by neutrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
I don't see a true RINO. What I see is someone scared to be a conservative. Most of the planks you mention are "rock the boat" measures (and some are not relevant to his job at all such as overhauling the federal tax code or pulling out of the UN). So why take a position that would be so easy to turn into an attack ad for his opponents?

"Governor Perry would destroy minoroty hiring contracts and force English on everyone in our school systems..."

It's no wonder he's being mealy-mouthed about it. He's actually following the script of his predecessor to a tee. Perry's doing just the sort of stuff Bush was doing when he was Governor.

You can say these folks aren't conservative, but you can't say they're not popular.

4 posted on 07/13/2002 1:30:26 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist

6 posted on 07/13/2002 1:40:30 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Perry is pro-gun, pro-life, pro-war-on-terror, and he has powerful Hispanic friends such as the current Presidents of Bolivia and Mexico.

Hispanics now outnumber Blacks in America. Discard them at your own risk.

8 posted on 07/13/2002 1:50:50 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
The Lt. Govenor has most of the power in Texas politics. With that in mind, where does David Dewhearst stand on the planks?
10 posted on 07/13/2002 2:07:21 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Flame or comment away.
No flame and I won't even bother with too many comments.

That is who the Rep. Party chose for you to choose from. How sad. A write in campaign would yield a better candidate.
Like "None of the Above" from "Brewster's Millions".
Pardon the cynicism.

TEXAS

13 posted on 07/13/2002 2:34:54 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
The party opposes ballot initiatives and referendum votes as a bypass of "checks and balances." Perry said he "would be open to initiative and referendum with a high threshold for getting on the ballot."

This is a bit of a non sequitur, but I've always been troubled by the "referendum" process.

It is, in effect, "direct democracy" of the kind we ought to be on guard against.

Now, to be sure, there ARE "checks and balances" in that unconstitutional laws passed by referendum can be challenged in court. But there is certainly no executive veto available that I know of.

Anyway, the referendum process has always bothered me because it provides a sort of negation of the argument against direct democracy which the Lefties would LOVE to extend to the national level.

16 posted on 07/13/2002 3:16:05 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
* Perry does not believe there is "sufficient citizen or legislator support" to abolish the Texas Lottery, as proposed in the party platform.

Oh, and I guess I don't really mind the lottery, aka the "dumb tax." Sometimes when I'm watching my 401K shrivel I indulge the urge to buy a ticket, especially when the jackpot's topping $20 mil.

I often imagine a Simpson's-like scenario in which someone tells me "You'd have a better chance of getting struck by lightning" to which I reply, Homer-esque: "Struck by lightning, eh..?"

19 posted on 07/13/2002 5:21:18 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
I can't really disagree with your overall point. I'll be voting for Perry too, but without tremendous enthusiasm. Regarding the out of control spending, I'd blame George W. Bush for that, as he never had to worry about running out of money because the economy was so strong.
20 posted on 07/13/2002 5:23:54 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
I know this is an election year and realize I will probably be criticized by the "party loyalty at all costs" crowd for speaking out against Perry.

As a precinct chair and party activist, know that I agree with you 100%. I will hold my nose and vote for him as the lesser-of-two-evils. (I'm not sure about that!

Perry was a Democrat; I think he still is.

I live in Southeast Texas, still home to the "yellow dogs." Bush won all three elections he ran in on the strength of conservative Dems. Perry is going to lose them; they have no reason to vote for him over Sanchez.

My greatest fear is that it will trickle down and have influence on state rep elections. Control of the Texas Senate was determined by the vote count in my county four (or six) years ago. And I mean vote count. The GOP candidate did not carry my county but he got sufficient votes to win the election which gave control of the senate to the Republicans.

We control 19 of 21 precincts in the county and I'm afraid we will lose half of them with Perry. It's determined by votes for governor.

There is a lot riding on this election and Perry is a drag on the ticket, IMHO.

27 posted on 07/13/2002 6:24:17 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Try this guy. I've met Jeff and talked over the issue with him. He's boarder line for an LP'er and would probably be better off in the RLC.
28 posted on 07/13/2002 6:27:56 AM PDT by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
What is there to gain by changing the title of the article?
29 posted on 07/13/2002 6:30:00 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Perry is a snake in the grass political opportunist who will change his postion with the wind. One thing is certain - if he makes it back into the Texas governership, he ain't going nowhere else.

As someone else said, most of us will be voting for him holding our noses.

31 posted on 07/13/2002 7:08:02 AM PDT by txzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Democrat Cuellar is believed to have an excellent chance to unseat the Republican Bonilla. And Perry helped to strengthen Cuellar. Rumor is that Cuellar was caught in a compromising sexual situation in the fall of 2001 and suddenly resigned as secretary of state. He did not even inform Perry that he was quitting. He gave maybe 72 hours of notice. Perry learned from a reporter elsewhere in the state that Cuellar had stepped down. At first Cuellar said that he would vote for Perry for governor. He has since changed his mind and has joined the Sanchez camp, even though Sanchez had earlier spread ugly rumors around the state about Cuellar's sexuality.
33 posted on 07/13/2002 7:12:09 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist; BUSHdude2000
I only disagree with Perry on five of his points and the Texas Sec of State is a nice photo op job with no power.

The Texas platform is written so that VERY FEW people with an IQ above 100 points can agree with all of it!

BTW I do NOT like Perry but then again I don't much like our Platform Committee nor those who insist we should all follow it.

36 posted on 07/13/2002 7:40:54 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
Can't the republican party find another candidate to run? Why should the party support candidates who are not compatible with it's mission.
37 posted on 07/13/2002 7:43:58 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist; BUSHdude2000; sonofliberty2; Scholastic; belmont_mark; DoughtyOne; HalfIrish
Wow! Gov. Perry sounds like a real RINO! He is clearly trying to use Bush's bipartisan approach of appointing liberal Democraps to high ranking posts in his administration/judiciary. He is also repudiating conservatism while coopting much of the liberal Democrap agenda. The similarities to his predecessor, George W. Bush on these points are nothing less than STUNNING!
39 posted on 07/13/2002 8:48:46 AM PDT by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
How many people write the Republican party platform? It seems so right wing that no candidate espousing all of it would ever be elected to statewide office. Candidates do have to run in the real world.
41 posted on 07/13/2002 1:39:15 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPcapitalist
The reason I'll vote for Perry is this - the vote will be close and I don't know what Sanchez really stands for. I have heard people like you intelligently argue that he is a left wing extremist. Several of my friends who work on congressional staffs in Austin thought argue intelligently that he far to the right of Perry. None of us can figure out where he is coming from. Perry is what he appears to be - A country club Republican. I'll take that over Sanchez's unknowns.
42 posted on 07/13/2002 5:22:15 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson