Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Northern Command General Endorses Posse Comitatus Review
NewsMax.com ^ | Monday, July 22, 2002 | NewsMax.com

Posted on 07/22/2002 11:46:03 AM PDT by USA21

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2002 11:46:03 AM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USA21
We don't need this. Remember that when tanks are rumbling through your subdivision.
2 posted on 07/22/2002 11:48:05 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: USA21
Who publishes "The Posse Comitatus Review," and how much does a one-year subscription cost?
4 posted on 07/22/2002 11:49:23 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michellcraig
Postal officials change stance on Operation TIPS

From Kelli Arena

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a shift from its position 24 hours earlier, the U.S. Postal Service said Thursday it had decided to meet with the Justice Department to discuss Operation TIPS, a government plan to encourage U.S. postal workers to report suspicious activity as part of the government's war on terrorism.

USPS officials had said Wednesday their 800,000 employees would not participate in the proposed program, whose name is an acronym for Terrorist Information and Prevention System.

But the USPS explained Thursday, "That decision was made because we had insufficient information on the program, and because we had not discussed the issue internally or with the two unions affected."

In a statement, the postal service said it, the National Association of Letter Carriers and the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association agreed a meeting was necessary with Department of Justice representatives to discuss the initiative. No meeting has been scheduled. Several weeks ago, Homeland Security officials approached the postal service about Operations TIPS and held a preliminary meeting about the possible involvement of letter carriers in the proposed initiative. Plans for the program have raised concern across the political spectrum. Members of civil liberties and privacy groups have joined conservative groups in their condemnation of the proposed program, dubbing it "Operation Snoops."

5 posted on 07/22/2002 11:50:52 AM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Just a matter of time, Fox is giving it the spin job now. Wonder how long before a Teinamin Square on our soil?
6 posted on 07/22/2002 11:51:46 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tracer
Backing for Bush army plan

From AP

July 23, 2002

WASHINGTON: US homeland security chief Tom Ridge yesterday cautiously backed President George W. Bush's call for the military to be used for domestic law enforcement, saying there was a need for "discussion" on the proposal.

A 90-page strategy document released by Mr Bush last week outlines the creation of a Homeland Security Department and the review of a law which bans the military from arrests, searches, seizing evidence and other police activity on US soil. The Coast Guard and National Guard troops, under the control of state governors, are excluded from the law, known as the "Posse Comitatus Act".

Mr Ridge, speaking ahead of a Bush speech on the strategy planned for last night, Australian time, admitted it went "against our instincts as a country to empower the military with the ability to arrest", and called the prospect "very unlikely", but said it was important the law be examined.

Influential Democratic senators Carl Levin and Joe Bidden told television news programs separately yesterday they supported reviewing the law, but they expressed no interest in granting the military new powers to arrest Americans.

Congress is racing to approve Mr Bush's proposed legislation by the end of its autumn session. In the Senate, a version of the measure by Democrat Joseph Lieberman tracks closely with Mr Bush's plan.

It also would augment the agency's ability to gather intelligence from the FBI, CIA and others. That bill is to be considered by the Governmental Affairs Committee, which Senator Lieberman heads, tomorrow.

House Majority Leader Dick Armey said on NBC's Meet the Press there was a strong possibility Congress would resolve its differences and send Mr Bush a bill enacting the sweeping reorganisation by September 11.

Some lawmakers have expressed concern about rushing decisions on far-reaching changes in the bureaucracy, but Mr Armey said: "It's time to move forward with this. The President's got a good plan."

7 posted on 07/22/2002 11:58:53 AM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Waco?
8 posted on 07/22/2002 11:59:29 AM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USA21
(Thanks, but I just was making a pun re: the title of the thread)
9 posted on 07/22/2002 12:01:39 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
Good point. Started out as an ATF/DEA/Childrens Services kinda thing tho. I always did think it was just a test run to get us ready.
10 posted on 07/22/2002 12:03:13 PM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
We don't need this. Remember that when tanks are rumbling through your subdivision.

Are you saying that the Posse Comitatus Act is the only statute on the books that has divine perfection in past, present, and infinitely distant future?

11 posted on 07/22/2002 12:04:47 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tracer
LOL!
12 posted on 07/22/2002 12:07:10 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Are you saying that the Posse Comitatus Act is the only statute on the books that has divine perfection in past, present, and infinitely distant future?

Hadn't thought about it much until just now. But the New World is overflowing with banana republics, what's one more?

13 posted on 07/22/2002 12:07:14 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USA21
Gen. Ralph E. Eberhart, the officer charged with defending the continental U.S., has gone on record that he’s That he's a traitor, not unlike Bill Clinton , who will disregard his sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution, If Bush had any American gutts in that whishywashy Icc-lovin body of his he'd fire this traitor. But Bush won't cause he's part of the problem and supports terrorism within the USA.
14 posted on 07/22/2002 12:07:26 PM PDT by Marobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marobe
As part of his effort to bolster security, Bush has called on Congress to thoroughly review the 19th century law that bans the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps from participating in arrests, searches, seizure of evidence and other police-type activity on U.S. soil.

The Coast Guard and National Guard troops under the control of state governors are excluded from the Reconstruction-era law, known as the Posse Comitatus Act.

15 posted on 07/22/2002 12:09:27 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
we have all the laws we need on the book now
16 posted on 07/22/2002 12:10:33 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USA21
And not one needs to be reviewed, huh?
17 posted on 07/22/2002 12:12:52 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Marobe
Homeland security plan lays out 'lines of authority'

By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

By Larry Downing, Reuters

President Bush, with Vice President Cheney, discusses homeland security strategy Tuesday.

WASHINGTON — President Bush's national strategy for homeland security offers a chilling reminder of the dangers the nation faces at the hands of terrorists and a dizzying list of high-tech solutions that could cost the government and industry billions of dollars.

From futuristic systems that would detect a person's "hostile intent" to consideration of military enforcement of quarantines, the strategy is a blueprint for how the government and private sector should prepare for another terrorist attack.

"This comprehensive plan lays out clear lines of authority and clear responsibilities ... for federal employees and for governors and mayors and community and business leaders and the American citizens," Bush said upon releasing the 71-page report. "With a better picture of those responsibilities, all of us can direct money and manpower to meet them."

White House officials acknowledged that implementing the plan would take years and billions of dollars. Much of it would require action by Congress, cash-strapped state and local governments, businesses and foreign governments.

Bush's strategy calls for a national effort that also would include developing new vaccines to fight bioterrorism, creating high-tech chemical detection systems and expanding extradition authority.

"Our society presents an almost infinite array of potential targets that can be attacked through a variety of methods," the strategy says. "We must be prepared to adapt as our enemies in the war on terrorism alter their means of attack."

Much of what is in the plan is already underway, such as increasing security at U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico and stockpiling vaccines against anthrax and smallpox. Congress also is on its way to creating a 170,000-employee department of homeland security.

Homeland security experts praised the strategy as a solid outline of the ongoing terrorist threat, the nation's vulnerabilities and what needs to be done. To that end, the plan says the government should:

Create "red teams" of federal agents who would run mock-terrorism drills to try to find weaknesses in preparedness. Use the military for civilian defense, including enforcing quarantines in case of an attack using a contagious virus. Review state quarantine laws, some of which are more than 100 years old.

Increase the availability of terrorism insurance. Develop a scientific system to detect a person's hostile intent, so security officials could find possible terrorists.

Review public disclosure laws that might discourage some companies, such as those that have dangerous chemical plants, from sharing proprietary information with the government.

Randall Larsen, director of the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security, called the report "a great step forward."

Others questioned whether the strategy is fiscally realistic. The federal government and the states have spent more than $50 billion on homeland security; the strategy says the private sector, which spent $55 billion a year on security before Sept. 11, might need to double that.

In Congress, which is on a fast track to approve a new department, lawmakers welcomed the strategy, but Democrats questioned some elements.

Rep. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., expressed concern that the Bush administration will try to amend the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which forbids the military from engaging in civilian law enforcement. Menendez also said he worried that a recommended national standard for driver's licenses could infringe on Americans' civil liberties.

Former acting CIA director Jack Devine said the focus should remain on hunting down terrorists abroad. "This is more of an offensive game than a defensive game," he said. "Homeland security improves our position somewhat, but it doesn't get you to the point where you can sleep at night."

18 posted on 07/22/2002 12:15:18 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: USA21
The Art of the Cache by Travis McGee. Food for thought. You're not going to win a shootout with a tank if they come for your stuff. Just ask yourself, how would David Koresh be viewed in today's climate of fear? If you're sitting on a big supply of weapons, you might want to give this some thought before anything gets signed into law. If you wait till they throw up checkpoints on the roads it'll be too late.
19 posted on 07/22/2002 12:24:19 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA21
Have they defined 'military' yet? Will it be limited to only US Forces or perhaps will it include NATO, UN or other foreign 'military'...under "our" command, of course.
20 posted on 07/22/2002 12:49:44 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson