Campaign Donations of Sanford Weill, CEO of CitiGroup

Federal Elections Commission ^ | now | FEC

[bonesmccoy]

Say, what happens when you run the FEC database for the corporate leadership of MCI WorldCom, CitiBank, and Oracle?

I'll post the names of board members and donations according to the FEC website.

[demsux]

BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP

[demsux]

Gawd, that's enough to make me fire my broker at Merrill Lynch.

[bonesmccoy]

CAN SOMEONE explain how "UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA" can donate to a political campaign? The UC system is a TAXPAYER financed system!

[Mo1]

Good Grief .. Schummer sure is getting some BIG bucks

[bonesmccoy]

You should have posted your runs in your own thread. You've completely obliterated any ability of me to post results in a concise manner. Was your intent to obliterate the ability of people to follow this thread? Or was your intent to flood it?

[dixiechick2000]

Frankly, I found kcvl's contribution extremely helpful on this topic.
Please, don't be anal.

[dixiechick2000]

"$100,000 Portland General Electric Andrews, Michael Allen Dawe, Christopher M Troy, Megan H "

Especially this part.
Unless it's Portland, ME, that's my power company.

[kcvl]

Did you also see where Ann Lewis, Podesta, etc. were lobbyist? Someone with the last name Bayh(a relative maybe?) and a Nathan Daschle(on another thread). Seems rather unethical(ROFLOL!) to me.

[kcvl]

Is that better? You can have it all to yourself now. I'm very sorry you had such a problem with it. See, all you have to do is ask and I'll be more than happy to stay clear of YOUR thread.

[dixiechick2000]

"Seems rather unethical(ROFLOL!) to me."

heheh
Ummm...just a tad unethical.
BTW, I saw Ann Lewis just this past weekend on FNC.
eewwwww...

[Humidston]

BUMP!

[SoDak]

Citigroup is the number one contributer to my RAT Senator Time Johnson, and number two contributor to my RAT Senator Dasshole. (just behind Northwest Airlines, Tommies wife is a lobbyist for air interests, go figure).

[bonesmccoy]

While your postings were interesting, your flooding of info over diluted the ability of people to converse. That is totally counterproductive to the intent of the website. Any individual active in psyops knows how these things go.

I'm glad we share common policy intents. However, I want to encourage you to understand that the QUANTITY of information is not as relevant as being concise and direct.

Please continue to post your information, but direct it to a special thread.