Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hefty Asteroid to Sweep Near Earth. (Almost a half mile wide. Can be Seen w/Binoculars)
Sky and Telescope ^ | Roger W. Sinnott

Posted on 07/25/2002 9:34:11 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf
WE'RE DOOMED! The only chance we have is Hillery gets elected president and they beam her face into space to scare it away! WE'RE DOOMED!
41 posted on 07/25/2002 1:15:22 PM PDT by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
Unfortunately, it takes more energy to get to the sun than to about anyplace else in the solar system.

How did Old Navy do it then?

("Fun in the sun? Oh no, my friend, fun on the sun!")

;-)

42 posted on 07/25/2002 1:20:09 PM PDT by Jay W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Somebody help me out here: we will be able to see an object a mere 1/2 mile across that is 333,000 miles away with a regular pair of binoculars??
43 posted on 07/25/2002 1:21:10 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Both agencies are focusing on a flyby just 20 years from now (on August 18, 2022), when there appears to be a 1-in-500,000 chance of an impact — extremely unlikely, but worrisome just the same.

Well, if it's ultimatley gonna hit us, let it be Southern California.

44 posted on 07/25/2002 1:25:21 PM PDT by skateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You wouldn't have to hit such an asteroid with something to deflect it. You could accomplish the same end by diverting the earth ever so slightly. Would that cost so much?
45 posted on 07/25/2002 1:26:57 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Opinions?

Don't worry about this one. There's a much bigger one that will take us all out on Feb. 1, 2019.

46 posted on 07/25/2002 1:32:24 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"will be able to see an object a mere 1/2 mile across that is 333,000 miles away with a regular pair of binoculars?"

The article estimates that the asteroid will get as bright as magnitude 9.3. As a rule of thumb, 50mm binoculars will allow you to see a magnitude 10 object. You'll be able to see it with them, barely, if you have a really dark sky and know where to look. No way with 35mm binoculars.

You might want to check the Sky and Telescope web site or pick up the next issue.

47 posted on 07/25/2002 1:36:26 PM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Starship Troopers... LOVE IT! Bugs throwing rocks at Earth... priceless.
48 posted on 07/25/2002 1:39:04 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I would think it would at least mess with the weather...
49 posted on 07/25/2002 1:48:10 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
diverting the earth ever so slightly

Procedure for moving planets:

1. Remove atmosphere
2. Stop rotation
3. Install and activate thrust vector motors
4. After arriving in desired location, reverse this procedure.

50 posted on 07/25/2002 2:18:18 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What I was thinking was, a few megaton thermonuclear bombs, strategically placed and simultaneously exploded, might delay the progress of the earth in its orbit by a fraction of a second (or, conversely, speed its progress up). Would it be impossible for them to have that effect?
51 posted on 07/25/2002 2:21:31 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Yeah, you could do that. It would take more than a few megatons to make a measureable difference. Maybe if you launched the entire continent of Africa into deep space you would get some result, probably not enough to matter. Remember there are only enough nukes on earth now to launch France into the stratosphere where it would just drift back over a period of weeks and wouldn't change earth's orbit at all. But the Environmental Impact Statement would be the real hard part.
52 posted on 07/25/2002 2:30:41 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rintense
thanks, Loved that movie with its jolly fascism, beautiful young people and jingoism. Physicist felt he needed to correct my spelling of the bug home world. Betcha couldn't pull a needle out of his but with a tractor!
53 posted on 07/25/2002 2:34:08 PM PDT by ffusco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; aristeides
diverting the earth ever so slightly

Easier:

On the next Shuttle trip, sent up a Stop Light.

54 posted on 07/25/2002 2:49:22 PM PDT by Mr_Magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
If I could have back all the quarters I dumped in that machine in the late seventies, I'd be a rich man.
55 posted on 07/25/2002 2:55:30 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Remember back when NASA was trying to do a near fly-by of Mars, but the vehicle (probe, satellite, whatever) crashed due to a Metric/English Standard mistake?

I hope someone checked their math...

56 posted on 07/25/2002 2:59:05 PM PDT by justaguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: justaguy
I hope someone checked their math...

When the survival of mankind, civilization, and the planet itself is at stake, will somebody come to their senses long enough to check the math? Maybe, but I have learned that if someone is using the wrong numbers, not only will they not listen to you, but they will bet the farm, too.

57 posted on 07/25/2002 4:04:46 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
We should try for an unmanned landing on it, and leave some souvenirs there. For example, a tablet with the 10 commandments, a U.S. flag, a cross and Star of David, a plaque stating "In God We Trust", pictures of Presidents Reagan and Bush (both of 'em). That ought to really piss off the ACLU and other liberal scum!
58 posted on 07/25/2002 5:27:19 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Won't be a few $1 million. More like $100 billion to $1 trillion.
It will probably still be too light to see this from Fairbanks,

Things are always more expensive in Alaska (was in Anchorage in'65). Enjoy your astronomical observations very much. Since our budgets have become astronomical, I'm taking your word for it. ;^)

59 posted on 07/25/2002 5:40:24 PM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
Since our budgets have become astronomical, I'm taking your word for it

Hasn't been much objection to the $1 trillion figure. Maybe I'm bidding way too low :)

60 posted on 07/25/2002 5:48:40 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson