To: L.N. Smithee
Uh...the truth?
OK. From now on we'll just tell the criminals to tell the truth. After that, we'll know that everyone who pleads innocent must be.
To: RogerFGay
OK. From now on we'll just tell the criminals to tell the truth. After that, we'll know that everyone who pleads innocent must be. Pay attention, will you?
Your question was, "And your plan to protect the innocent?" Not "And your plan to protect the criminals who lie about being innocent?"
To: RogerFGay
You're missing the whole point, that being, the morality is assualted when the lawer his client is guilty, and uses subvversion to gain his/her freedom. The idea is, this isn't justice, it's a perversion of justice.
22 posted on
07/25/2002 1:41:28 PM PDT by
jim35
To: RogerFGay
uh..I'm certainly not a lawyer, but what would be the correct course of action if a defense attorney knows his client is guilty, but also knows that the prosecutors don't have enough evidence, or have somehow skirted the rights of the accused?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson