To: Dog Gone
No--he is not manipulatying the system. That evidence never happened because the police were there illegally.
To: Pharmboy
the biggest oversite here is the fact that this animal is going on trial for what he has done to this victim, drumming up his past and the system that fails the victims everyday should not be on trial.
There exists no perfect system in this world, and the only justice we have that can afford us liberty is the one we have. If the laws need changing its the courts and the legislature that have to be fixed, the lawyers can only work within the law as layed out before them.
Time to get proper representation and judges elected and appointed, leave the lawyers out of it.
Ops4 God Bless America!
154 posted on
07/25/2002 6:46:42 PM PDT by
OPS4
To: Pharmboy
The OJ jury could'nt figure out how pack sand into a rat hole. The whole DNA evidence was over their heads, they had a collective I.Q. of a toaster.
To: Pharmboy
That evidence never happened because the police were there illegally. That's simply not true. The evidence is quite real. The attorney is going to argue that this very real evidence of his client's guilt should be disregarded, not because his client is innocent, but for some unrelated reason.
The whole world, if it cares, knows that our defendant possessed marijuana in violation of the law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson