No, I never implied that scenario...I should've, perhaps, made myself a little more clearer. What i was implying/referring to, was the sharade we had with OJ Simpson trial, and the inability of judge Ito to control his court from the prosecution to the defense theatrics for the camera.
What I was refering to, was the little Samantha's case whereby Sheriff Carrona emphasised that they have strong, very strong evidence against that Avila animal.
Keep also in mind, that animal was set free prior, because of some sort of judicial techno babble, so that he can go again and kill little girls.
Well in my book, that jury and the lawyers involved in that case against Avila, have innocent blood on their hands.Period!
Now a days, in our esteemed judicial system the "VICTIMS" are put on trial, while everyone is going bonkers protecting criminals, and their so called "rights"[(the cops did not have their radars calibrated on time(speeding tickets and/or misc traffic violations), on the crime scene the rookie cop did not have his special gov. issued gloves on, while collecting evidence, one cop sez something un-PC about 20 Years ago, therefore he is disqualified as a witness, etc.,etc.)].
That's what I meant, and I will stick with it, like it or not!