Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Want To Build A Nuke? Try Your Local Library
BushCountry.org ^

Posted on 07/28/2002 9:29:42 AM PDT by justme346


If you were planning to build a nuclear bomb, you would probably want to visit your local library to read such classics as Los Alamos Primer: First Lectures On How To Build An Atomic Bomb. Although not exactly a blueprint, the book is considered a good guide to the physics of nuclear fission. Saddam Hussein's bomb development team had a copy in its library, and you can obtain one for $27.50 by calling the University of California Press. The Boston Public Library bought two copies in 1992, but a clerk there recently admitted that the circulating copy is missing.

Nuclear-weapons experts are familiar with the book, a transcription of talks delivered at the onset of the Manhattan Project. Theodore B. Taylor, a retired U.S. nuclear-weapons designer who also served as the deputy director of the Pentagon's nuclear agency in the 1960s, knows the title well. In fact, Taylor says he would fail any student assigned to find open-literature publications about nuclear weapons if the student didn't come up with Los Alamos Primer.

"There is a lot more information in the public domain that was not there 10 years ago," acknowledges Terry Hawkins, deputy director of the nonproliferation and international security division at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Declassification and open-literature publication have driven this trend, he notes. "There is so much information floating around," adds his colleague Robert Kelley, who manages the Los Alamos nuclear emergency and proliferation response effort, "and it offers a person so many choices that he is often confused."

Although the U.S. government has been worried about nuclear terrorism and extortion for years, the ready availability of information has recently heightened fears. So has the availability of fissionable material. As the former Soviet empire continues to crumble, its nuclear materials have become tempting targets for smugglers and organized crime.

A third factor that piques concern is the emergence of religiously motivated terrorist groups, bent on causing mass death without regard to political considerations. This marks a change from the days when politically motivated terrorist groups such as the Red Brigade engaged in murder and kidnapping but rarely tried to inflict a large number of casualties.

During the Cold War, the difficulty and expense of obtaining nuclear materials provided a barrier against nuclear terrorism. "That barrier is not as formidable as it once was," says Hawkins. "If a terrorist group or rogue state gets ahold of such material from smugglers, they solve the single most difficult problem in building a bomb."

From a security standpoint, the good news is that the Russian military is believed to be keeping a tight grip on strategic and tactical nuclear warheads. But it is also in the process of dismantling many of these weapons, creating stockpiles of bomb-grade plutonium and highly enriched uranium. The bad news is that at civilian laboratories fissionable material is not as closely guarded as it is in the West.

This has led to a series of smuggling incidents involving plutonium, highly enriched uranium and other bomb-related materials. In any one case, the police have not found enough material to make a bomb. In some instances, including the well-publicized Munich arrests of August 1994, the smugglers were simply falling for a sting operation and selling wares to undercover agents.

The U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories are working closely with their Russian counterparts to improve security, mainly by transferring commercially available Western technology to former Soviet facilities. But progress is slow. "One kilogram under control is only one kilogram under control," says Hawkins. "We have to work one kilogram at a time."

It will take Russia years to properly account for all the material it has--much less determine if any is missing. That raises concern now, because it takes only 30 to 50 pounds of highly enriched uranium or 10 to 20 pounds of plutonium to make a bomb.

According to physicist David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, D.C., there are more than 1700 tons of highly enriched uranium and 1100 tons of plutonium in the world. Only 22% of the plutonium is under military control, while the rest is spent fuel from reactors or plutonium already separated from that spent fuel. Despite claims to the contrary, reactor-grade plutonium can be used to make a bomb. In fact, in 1962 the Defense Department set off a bomb (yielding just under 20 kilotons) made of reactor-grade plutonium--just to see if it could be done.

Experts disagree on how difficult it would be for a terrorist group to fabricate a crude nuclear device--one able to deliver at least a one-kiloton blast (1000 times the impact of the World Trade Center bomb). Taylor believes a single individual working alone could do it, given access to enough fissionable material. Taylor, who designed one of the largest as well as one of the smallest nuclear weapons ever developed by the United States, doesn't believe that industrial-grade machine tools would be required.

Another weapons specialist points out that many of the components needed to build a nuclear device are on a list of limited-access items, adding that "you can't buy a fast-firing fuse set by just walking into Sears." But this expert concedes that while the threat of someone building a nuclear bomb in a basement is low, it isn't nonexistent.

On the other hand, J. Carson Mark, former head of nuclear-weapons development at Los Alamos, doesn't think a lone individual could build a bomb unless that person could master several disciplines. Mark believes it would take a team of specialists about a year. The group would have to include a nuclear physicist, a mechanical engineer, a chemist, an explosives expert, a mathematician and others.

Although it might be possible to develop a bomb in a year, history suggests otherwise. Kelley points out that South Africa spent four years creating a gun-type device that used highly enriched uranium. A small team of 10 to 20 people designed the weapon, and a large infrastructure was required to produce the highly enriched uranium.

David Hughs


TOPICS: Announcements; Editorial; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/28/2002 9:29:42 AM PDT by justme346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justme346
No book burnings!
2 posted on 07/28/2002 9:33:53 AM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
And Amazon's got the book for 34.95!
3 posted on 07/28/2002 9:50:37 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
It's easy, just get a soccer ball, stuff it full of enriched urineanium, get some of that c-fore stuff and super-glue it to the panels, attach disco-strobe igniturs, damper the back of each c-fore encrusted panel, stick it in your New Balances (size 98) and light a match (while sitting next to a person that looks like Hulk Hogan).

All spelling is intentionally correct here, I'm hoping Saddam will intercept this.

4 posted on 07/28/2002 9:53:09 AM PDT by greydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greydog
If a nuke is popped in the U.S., it will not be a backyard project. It will have come from Iraq or Iran. The same, for that matter, with any serious bioweapons attack.
5 posted on 07/28/2002 10:51:40 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The problem is not in the domain of physics nor is it in the fundamental design. All that has been known for decades. A plutonium implosiondesign has problems associated with its implementations [the polonium initiator and the ignition devices] and this would take some doing. However a uranium gun design is almost trivial in construction [for at least some degree of explosion]. A terrorist might not get a large yield from a gun design [it might well fizzle before it REALLY goes BOOM, but then a terrorist only wants to do somethig along these lines. Remember that the gun design bomb dropped on Japan had NEVER been tested before it was used.

The real problem is in obtaining fissionable material and in the fabrication of this stuff. Probably better to steal one.
6 posted on 07/28/2002 11:47:04 AM PDT by drjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justme346
I made a tennis ball cannon once.
7 posted on 07/28/2002 11:48:02 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
I find it ironic that many of the same people who are now complaining about how "easy it is to build a bomb" are the same ones who pushed for public disclosure of this information on the basis of "the public's right to know".

Some time ago I helped develop and implement a shipping plan for some SNM and of course it included a security plan. The security stuff was classified as "not for public disclosure". Makes sense, yes? Yet I was called upon to testify before an administrative law judge concerning an FOIA action filed by an anti-nook kook intervenor who wanted to see (and disclose) the security information. The basis of his action as "an interested party" was to assure the public that adequate security measures were being taken, and that he and the public had a right to know the details. My position was that they had a right to assurances that adequate security measures were being taken, but that the information in question, had a "need to know" basis for only two groups: those who are implementing the security, or those trying to defeat it. Fortunately (and, unfortunately, somewhat rarely) common sense prevailed and the information was not broadcast around the world.

8 posted on 07/29/2002 5:58:18 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drjoe
The problem is not in the domain of physics nor is it in the fundamental design. All that has been known for decades. A plutonium implosiondesign has problems associated with its implementations [the polonium initiator and the ignition devices] and this would take some doing. However a uranium gun design is almost trivial in construction [for at least some degree of explosion]. A terrorist might not get a large yield from a gun design [it might well fizzle before it REALLY goes BOOM, but then a terrorist only wants to do somethig along these lines. Remember that the gun design bomb dropped on Japan had NEVER been tested before it was used. The real problem is in obtaining fissionable material and in the fabrication of this stuff. Probably better to steal one.

You familiar with the [untested!] WWII Nazi *Virus House* design? Simple, and rather elegant:

******************************************************************************

"Virus House" German Nuclear Weapon
Circa 1944-45     by Pat F.
        Suspension Lug (Fin Attachment?)
This device was to use a total of 10 layers of semi-refined U-235/238, alternating with Neutron absorbing kerosene. On impact, plungers would crush "Präparat", releasing neutrons, as shear pins broke, allowing the Uranium plates to come together via inertia and make a supercritical mass. The device would then detonate, or at least melt down, causing massive contamination. The target was to be midtown Manhattan. Two prototypes MAY have been built in 1945.

       Impact Plunger to 
      Crush "Präparat"

U-235/238 (551 kg)

Kerosene

Ballast (Iron?)

Shear Pins

Polonium/Beryllium
"Urchin" (?)
 
 
 
 
 
 

Total Weight: 
1000 kg (2205 lbs)

 

|–––––– approx. 2.2 feet  (0.65 m)–––––|      P.F  -  2000

PART ONE: IN THE BEGINNING....

Over the years,there has been a good deal of speculation on the German's atomic program of W.W.II.  By putting together information from a number of reliable sources (listed at the end of the article), I have endeavored to give a brief overview of the project, as well as a cutaway drawing of what the finished weapon may have been like, and how it may have been delivered.
In the year 1914, H.G. Wells authored a small book entitled "The World Set Free". In it, he described a fictional future war fought with atomic weapons. The book caused a stir in physicists worldwide, and some began to look into the possibility that the energy that slowly emanated from radioactive elements could, if released all at once, cause considerable destruction.
First in Great Britain, and then later in the United States, research began to show that such a weapon stood within the realm of possibility, if certain fundamental problems could be solved:

Realizing that it did not have the resources necessary to conduct such a monumental effort, as well as living under the threat of invasion, Great Britain sent it's research on the subject to The United States, and several years later the project bore fruit in the skies over Japan.

PART TWO: GERMAN RESEARCH

In Germany, the story was very different - nuclear physics was viewed with suspicion, due to fact that many physicists were Jewish; and the whole concept stood at odds with the party's official view of the cosmos - which was very strange indeed.
(See "The Nazis and the Occult" by Dusty Sklar; and remember "Ice is not frozen water; water is melted ice.")
Besides not devoting enough effort to research, the German's made a simple, profound mistake early on; when they tested graphite as a moderator to slow the neutrons of a decaying uranium atom down to a speed where they could be used to cause other atoms to fission - But the graphite they used wasn't pure; and the impurities absorbed the neutrons, making the researchers write it off as a candidate for nuclear research - in reality it was an excellent moderator, low in cost and easily acquired.
With the apparent failure of graphite, the only other substance that appeared to hold promise was "Heavy Water" an exotic, and rare form of ordinary water in which deuterium, a form of the hydrogen atom, that is greater in atomic weight, replaces the ordinary hydrogen in H2O.
With a minuscule budget, and heavy water obtained from separators in hydro-electric dams, the German atomic bomb program got off to a very shaky start.
Working with what little they had, the physicists started trying to build a working atomic reactor - and here's where things start to get VERY interesting - according to the commonly held chain of events, the atomic reactor was a complete flop. It was found at the end of the war, a large cauldron of heavy water with hundreds of cubes of uranium suspended by chains inside it. The whole device looked more like something to be used in black magic, than serious science, and would have been right at home in a Wagner opera.
But there was another device built earlier; and on June 23, 1942, something went very wrong with it. This "Uranium Machine" as it, and the other test reactors were called, was located at the University of Leipzig, and was under the control of Werner Heisenberg, Head of the German atomic program.
The device consisted of two large aluminum hemispheres bolted together around the periphery, and contained a central sphere of heavy water surrounded by powdered uranium; it had been immersed in a pool of ordinary water for twenty days, when on the 23rd of June, it was noticed that bubbles were beginning to escape from it.
The sphere was lifted out of the water, and a access hatch on its outside was opened to determine what was amiss.
On opening the hatch, a hissing sound, followed by a jet of fire, came out of the sphere. Thinking that the uranium had somehow ignited, the scientists hosed the sphere down with water, until the fire appeared to be out. They then drained the heavy water out of the inner sphere, so that it would not be contaminated, and re-sealed the sphere and lowered it back into the water tank for safety's sake.
For a few hours all seemed to be well - then the sphere was seen to be emitting bubbles again, and more disturbingly, the water that it was immersed in began to boil, indicating a great deal of heat was being generated.
The scientists gathered around, and began frantically discussing what to do.... then, in horror, they noticed that the sphere was vibrating, and BEGINNING TO SWELL IN SIZE.
Everyone fled from the room, as a loud explosion, and a hailstorm of burning uranium, followed.
Fire crews were called and quickly put out the fires in the room; but no amount of water seemed capable of dousing the fire in the sphere, until it burnt out on its own two days later.
This is a very interesting event. First off - what was the purpose that the sphere was supposed to accomplish? Why put uranium and heavy water in a sphere made of aluminum and then sit back and wait three weeks?
As we read above, heavy water is a moderator - a substance that slows down neutrons, so that they may interact with other atoms.
If natural uranium undergoes nuclear bombardment, some of the U-238 will be transmuted into plutonium, while some is transmuted into U-233, another fissionable form. Aluminum, like beryllium, has the property of emitting neutrons when bombarded by alpha particles such as those generated by radium or polonium  To accomplish a significant amount of transmutation will take a while, several weeks in fact.
Wanna put one and two together? If this all sounds speculative and far fetched, you might want to get a copy of the March 1999 "Readers Digest", which reprints an article from "Harpers" magazine about a young man of seventeen years of age named David Hahn, who in 1994 built a "Uranium Machine" of his own out of aluminum, uranium metal, some thorium from gas lamp mantles, radium paint, and of course duct tape. His contraption worked so well that the EPA had to wear full environment suits to haul the end results of his experiment to a radioactive disposal site.
Now, he was a Boy Scout - but considering what he had to work with, is it inconceivable that Heisenberg could have accomplished at least as much in 1942?
Maybe you don't have to go to all the trouble of enriching the uranium; maybe be you can give it a friendly environment, and some of it will turn into plutonium, with a little help from some radium.
This is admittedly speculation. But something very odd indeed happened in that laboratory. And the description of the difficulty in putting the fire out sounds a lot like those at Chernobyl.
And from that accident, I think, came the germ of an idea, and the germ would be nurtured in the "Virus House".

PART THREE: VIRUS HOUSE

Virus House was a code name for German Atomic research, that came from one of the laboratories being a former medical research building. The German researchers came to the conclusion that building an atomic bomb, while possible, would be extremely costly, and time consuming - and it didn't look like Germany had the time or resources for the program.... but suddenly, in late 1944, a number of odd events occurred.

Until I purchased David Myhra's superb book on the Horton brother's flying wings, I had always thought that these efforts were merely the last, illogical, gasp of a nation that knew it had lost a war that it itself had started.

PART FOUR: THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB

On page 225 of Myhra's book is shown a cutaway of a atomic bomb of German design. The bomb consists of a sphere, approximately 2 1/2 feet in diameter, made up of two hemispheres, bolted together around the periphery (sound familiar?). In this case though, the interior is entirely different. Ten layers of uranium, in the form of circular plates of differing diameter, are stacked inside the top half of the sphere. The plates do not lie on top of one another, but are spaced apart, so that kerosene (Paraffin, as it's referred to in the cutaway) can flow between them, in alternating layers ofuranium- kerosene- uranium- kerosene, etc. Kerosene is an excellent absorber of neutrons, so that the plates cannot interact in an atomic manner. The diagram states that the total weight of the uranium is 551 kilograms, and it would be fascinating to compare this to the weight of uranium in the "Little Boy" bomb used on Hiroshima, but I've been unable to find information on that subject (it may still be classified). A tube runs vertically through the bomb's center, and the diagram shows a small, spherical object referred to as a "Paräparat" mounted at the very center of the sphere. "Paräparat" translates as "supplement" or "compound" in English, not terribly helpful unless you know that our nuclear weapons used a small crushable ball of beryllium and polonium (called a "Urchin" or "Golf ball") to release a spray of neutrons at the beginning of the fission process. If that's what the "Paräparat" is, then its in the exact right place to accomplish the same purpose. The bottom half of the sphere appears to be a solid mass of ballast - judging by the total weight of the sphere (1000 Kilograms), this is too light to be uranium; too heavy to be heavy water; so it's probably steel or iron. It's there for a very good reason, which we will get to shortly.

PART FIVE: HOW DOES THIS THING WORK?

Okay, lets have a look at this device in action.
It's noon in New York, and millions of people are milling about, in their happy, non-National Socialist way.
Little do they suspect that only a few miles away, and thirty thousand feet above them, death awaits like a hovering Teutonic eagle, in the form of a boomerang shaped flying wing. Cunningly the aircraft has entered into American airspace undetected, its smooth shape and special carbon glued wooden structure offering little for the defense radars to see. (Yes, the Ho XVIII was indeed a stealth bomber.) The bomber's crew are tired and tense - pray to God that the bomb hasn't sprung a leak of some sort... if the kerosene were to get out from between those plates....
The bombardier sights carefully - There's the Empire State building, and that would mean with this wind.... Bomb away! Now bank, hard, and run as fast as you can!
Below the bomber, a twelve foot long, near perfectly streamlined shape, about 2 1/2 feet in diameter, begins to accelerate earthward - its speed climbs until, like Britain's "Grandslam" bomb, it is moving supersonically. The armored nose cap, for all of it's weight, now performs a vital function. The bomb strikes a twenty story building, and passes though it in a half second, drilling deeply into the ground beneath - the rapid deceleration snaps the shear pins holding the uranium plates apart, and they crash into each other hard as the top half of the sphere disintegrates under the hydraulic pressure of the compressed kerosene, which sprays, ignited by the diesel effect, in all directions. As the bomb sphere drives itself down onto the armored nose cap, a plunger crushes the "Paräparat", and neutrons spray into the mass of uranium... and... and...
One of three things happen:

PART SIX: OF COURSE, IF IT WERE GOING FAST ENOUGH.....

But let's suppose, that instead of dropping it from a plane, we were to put it into the nose of a V-2 missile, and tow it up near New York, in one of the "Test stand XII" launching containers. The device is small enough to fit with ease into the warhead compartment, and weighs the same amount as the V-2's normal warhead - coincidence? Also, the ballast in the bottom part of the sphere serves as a anvil for the Uranium to smash into, while drilling into the ground.
Now, interesting possibilities arise - the two halves of the "Little Boy" atomic bomb's uranium were shot together at around a thousand feet per second; the V-2 hits the ground at over three times that speed, and the uranium plates would be driven together with enough force to melt them on impact; under these conditions a nuclear event is far more likely - especially when it's considered that three thousand feet per second is what our Los Alamos team considered as the speed at which plutonium could be made to fission.
Remember the heavy water/uranium ball experiment?

PART SEVEN: SO HOW FAR DID THEY GET?

At the end of the war two of the prototype bomb spheres MAY HAVE been found, south of Stuttgart, also found there was the uranium cauldron that I mentioned earlier. The two prototype bombs were supposedly found submerged in water by forces of the French Army, who supposedly destroyed them, along with the lab they were in, by explosives. The fact that they were being stored under water makes it sound like they may well have been ready for testing, and it would be interesting to know if the supposed site is still contaminated.

9 posted on 07/29/2002 2:05:03 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
I made a tennis ball cannon once.

Future generations will judge the propriety of your actions.

-archy-/-

10 posted on 07/29/2002 2:06:34 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: drjoe
However a uranium gun design is almost trivial in construction [for at least some degree of explosion]. A terrorist might not get a large yield from a gun design [it might well fizzle before it REALLY goes BOOM, but then a terrorist only wants to do somethig along these lines. Remember that the gun design bomb dropped on Japan had NEVER been tested before it was used.

Ayep, I'm afraid that's what we're looking at folks. I'm expecting between 10-80 ktons.

Think they'll figure out how to build a neutron trigger?

11 posted on 07/29/2002 3:04:56 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Think they'll figure out how to build a neutron trigger?

There's little doubt that given sufficient materials and funding such a device can be built, particularly given Kydaffi's previous attempts at doing so. Better questions would be directed as to how compact such a device can be built, and how *leaky* and otherwise susceptable to detection methods it might be.

See the Paräparat neutron trigger details of the *Virus House* device described in post #9, above....

As the bomb sphere drives itself down onto the armored nose cap, a plunger crushes the "Paräparat", and neutrons spray into the mass of uranium...

12 posted on 07/29/2002 4:51:07 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: archy
There's little doubt that given sufficient materials and funding such a device can be built, particularly given Kydaffi's previous attempts at doing so. Better questions would be directed as to how compact such a device can be built, and how *leaky* and otherwise susceptable to detection methods it might be.

About the size of a washing machine.

Neutron triggering could get you up to 80 Ktons.

Of course, if you were really smart, yield is limited only by your imagination. You simply, oh, nevermind, loose lips and all that.

Given the fact the world is awash in U-235, anthrax , smallpox , and god-knows what else, we had better hope that our enemy is dumber than our intelligence agencies.

Of course, in the future, I expect WMD will become democratized like every weapons technology before it.

We are going to have an extremely polite society or an extremely dead one.

13 posted on 07/29/2002 5:02:39 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: justme346
This stuff has been public knowledge since the 1960's. The hard part about building your own nuke isn't knowing how, it's having the industrial capacity to enrich uranium and build the actual bomb. Barring a "Dr Evil" type scenario, this cannot be hidden.

For a terrorist, the problem is where to buy or steal one, which doesn't require any nuclear knowhow at all.

14 posted on 07/31/2002 3:39:07 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson