BUSH: NINE FORMER PRESIDENTS WRONG; CLINTON RIGHT!

Mountain States Legal Foundation ^ | August 1, 2002 | William Perry Pendley

[Timesink]

And the WWE.

[Texasforever]

Oh, I thought it was pirates. I don't like pirates. They smell bad.

[Polonius]

WHAT? WHAT? WHAT?

[nopardons]

The Jews, the Masons, the Tri-lats,Bohemian Grovers, and goodness only knows what other boogymen, that poster is soooooooooooo afraid of / doesn't know about, were left unmentioned. ( snicker, snicker ! )

There is now, so much tinfoil, posted on FR, that all the magnets, in my house and the entire town I live in, are clinging to my house and screen. :-(

[dsutah]

Ok, well if H. Browne had been elected, everything would have gone well, right? The Democrats would have just got down on their knees, and begged for a treat, right? They would have done everything he wanted, and we would have all the Supreme Court judges he wanted put in, hmmmm? No, he wouldn't. Maybe you should come out of the clouds, eh? Harry Browne wouldn't have gotten anymore than Bush has. And which state was he the governor of? Which state did he represent in Congress? Does he have any foreign policy experience? Any domestic policy experience?

I'm really tired of having people thrown in my face who have no real experience in governing anything, no legislative experience, no foreign policy experience, (at least none I've heard of, correct me if I'm wrong about any of these!). At least Bush has had much of this, if not all!

[dsutah]

I must be a flaming liberal then. I always felt I was a conservative. But from the way these people talk, I guess not! I agree with a lot, if not most of what I thought were conservative ideals, but these people keep carping that if they could find a 'true' conservative, they would abandon Bush. Well that's fine, they don't have to support him, but if that's the way they feel, why did they ever support him at all?

Some claim they did, enthusiastically support him, then they act as if they made a 180 degree turn, over one or two issues. I've never seen anyone who truly knew where a candidate was on the issues, turn on them so completely.

Just how conservative is a 'true' conservative? What are they, extreme conservatives? If they are, I'm glad I'm not with them. A so-called 'true' conservative would not get elected too easily. They would have to actually win over a lot of people of different 'stripes', to actually get a thing done. Even B. Clinton wouldn't have been able to win if he ran as a 'pure' liberal. So he went to the middle, appears somewhat moderate, wins, and went straight back to the left.

[Texasforever]

Just how conservative is a 'true' conservative? What are they, extreme conservatives? If they are, I'm glad I'm not with them. A so-called 'true' conservative would not get elected too easily

The reality is that their brand of "conservative" has never, in the history of this country been elected. Don't let them get you down they are the eternally Pi##ed off that can only be happy when sniping from the sidelines.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Everyone, we should make sure of the validity of this article before we get angry.

I have heard and read some of the speeches that Bush has given over the course of the last couple of months and they go counter to this.

Please, first, let us make sure that this is not a fake.

[deport]

......A fake article........

Just click on the source MSLF and it goes to the article......

CLIFFS SYNFUEL CORPORATION .. is the case that the author is exceprting from. Read it and you'll find that the Corp. failed to do the required work as specified in the Mineral Leasing Act in 1920 law for 46 years. The Administrative Law Judge hearing their request ignored that little tidbit and ruled for the Cliffs Snyfuel Corp... The Department of Interior file an appealed. It was reversed on appeal and the law applied as written.

If it's wrong then change the law.

[Paul C. Jesup]

That still does not back up the main point of the article about Bush.

[AmishDude]

Once again, JimRob's bandwidth does not exist for you to advertise your website. BTW, if you read anything that fits in: In-House Wars: For at least one, the goal was to drive people away., feel free to act accordingly

[AmishDude]

Then you must be too busy to be here huh?

That's what I said when I found him the first time. Check his last post: He's HTMLguy!!!

[Willie Green]

Once again, JimRob's bandwidth does not exist for you to advertise your website.

Ah! AmishDude! You've come to recognize that Achtung Amerika is a shill!
Friendly advice: Don't be misled by all the patriotic trappings on that site.
Ol' Achtung praises tax-deadbeats who have renounced their citizenship to avoid prosecution as "tax patriots".

Go AmishDude Go!!!

[AmishDude]

Willie,

Come on, when a guy posts with rainbow colors, links his own website and generally acts like an arrogant goof, it's not hard to figure him out.

The particulars of his beliefs are nothing but a distraction anyway.

[Dawgsquat]

I just added:

Add a KEYWORD

[AmishDude]

Ping regarding a previous conversation.

[AmishDude]

Yeah, I'm thinking that feature isn't such a good idea.

[Dawgsquat]

I agree.

[deport]

Yep, I suspect that in time the feature will have to be removed. It's nice to be able to add but it may well be abused if someone wanted to..... jmo

[AmishDude]

The topics thing isn't bad, because there are only a fixed number of options.