This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^
| August 3, 2002
| By Veronique de Rugy
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 921-932 next last
To: Satadru
Don't you find it amusing that these are the same people who revere Reagan's 11th commandment. What a joke!Not as 'funny' as this.
"A new GOP political alliance aimed at reaching out to homosexuals is gaining support from lawmakers and has the ear of President Bush a fact that worries many pro-family groups."
" Glover added that the White House has shown strong support for the coalition."
By Martha Kleder, Washington, D.C., correspondent
Excerpts from this article.
521
posted on
08/05/2002 10:09:07 AM PDT
by
jla
To: Uncle Bill; Alamo-Girl
Wow! Excellent work. Have you been studying under Alamo-Girl on research, archiving and link development?
(Just kidding. I know you stand in your own right as a FR workhorse.)
This is a keeper fellow FReeper.
To: sinkspur
ROTFL But his thread generates over 500 posts.
What you mean is that Bushbot sycophants don't read his posts. Right?
To: christine11
i don't think registered is spreading disinformation on another forum. i saw where he posted "there is no excuse for what i did..." (admitting his error) and nothing further about the incident.You'd better take another look.
To: Satadru
You avoided the questions nicely. You don't understand a thing about the research going on. Hence the rest of your comments follow suit. L
To: christine11; Registered
Thank you for telling me that. The only times I've gone over there is when somebody has posted a link for one reason or another and I've clicked on it out of curiosity.
To be fair, there were other posters that have been spreading the disinformation over there. It was one of the threads that was linked here. Or perhaps somebody FR mailed it to me. I don't remember at this point. If it wasn't Registered then I apologize for assuming he had joined in and respect him for making the statement he did.
526
posted on
08/05/2002 10:35:09 AM PDT
by
terilyn
To: terilyn
you're welcome.
thanks! ;)
To: terilyn
You'd better look again.
To: TigersEye
What you mean is that Bushbot sycophants don't read his posts. Right? Bill just compiles FR threads and dumps the links when he's got nothing better to do.
Anybody who's been here any length of time has seen all of them already.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
LOL! Keep making a dunce out of yourself. Now I see why you like GW so much.
530
posted on
08/05/2002 12:13:49 PM PDT
by
Satadru
To: Satadru
And keep avoiding simple questions which you say you know the answer to. It only confirms others opinion of you. I asked 4 questions to some simple items which you drag around from thread to thread. You can't even offer facts for what you claim to believe - and use against President Bush.
Stupid is as stupid does.
To: Satadru
It was on the front page of the Chicago Tribune a few weeksLink, please?
And then show in the "article" where it says what you are saying he did; that he did "approve aborting fetuses for this reasearch".
Thanks.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
The stem cell decision has been twisted to suit the needs of the anti-Bush people. They totally ignore the support of certain pro-life people, and only highlight the ones who disagreed with it.
Satadru knows quite well what the decision was. He just likes to crank up the venom and make Bush sound like a villain, justifying all the petty swipes he takes at Bush supporters.
I don't have much to add to this, except to say that I continue to support the President, and the anti-Bush people here are going to find out, just as the democrats are currently learning, that the invective and slander isn't going to win them converts.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Hey sweety (not being sarcastic), he really did admit that what he did was completely stupid and unacceptable. I promise.
534
posted on
08/05/2002 1:05:52 PM PDT
by
oldvike
To: oldvike; Registered; Amelia; rintense; Howlin; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Miss Marple; Texasforever; ..
Hey sweety (not being sarcastic), he really did admit that what he did was completely stupid and unacceptable. I promiseReally? Gosh, I must have missed that post on FR. How about a link to it, please? Thanks.
To: christine11
Sorry, I just went and looked again. I take back everything I said.
You weren't an honest broker of information, therefore your word has zip for credibility in my book from here on out.
I took you at your word yet you chose to lie.
Reg has been a busy boy. Seems like he's "real sorry"...
You should be careful, you never know when your "friends" will turn on you too. With friends like that girl, you don't need enemies.
536
posted on
08/05/2002 1:18:06 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: RedBloodedAmerican
I must have missed that post on FR Did I ever say he posted it on FR? No. I believe he's been banned, anyway. However, he did post it on LibertyPost.org:
186. To: unsycophant (#183)
What! did you do?
There's absolutely no excuse for what I did. Were you looking for an excuse?
Registered posted on 2002-07-29 15:54:42 Reply
537
posted on
08/05/2002 1:18:20 PM PDT
by
oldvike
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I just did and take back every nice thing I ever tried to say.
The proof is on LF. The words don't lie.
Thanks for the heads up!
538
posted on
08/05/2002 1:20:07 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: oldvike
*yawn*
To: RedBloodedAmerican
*yawn*Lame. Oldvike made his point, and instead of acknowledging it, you just try to pretend it doesn't matter. Are you really interested in debate? Or do you have other motives here - do you *yawn* when the food fight is ended by facts?
540
posted on
08/05/2002 1:27:04 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 921-932 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson