1 posted on
08/06/2002 2:08:28 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Looks like Martha will have to do her "Home Decorating" segments from the Federal pen in Marion, Ill.
To: kattracks
Martha is one nasty person. The incident showed off her greed.
3 posted on
08/06/2002 4:43:27 AM PDT by
Dante3
To: kattracks
Although Stewart has not been charged in the case, her role has sent the stock of her own company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, plummeting, prompting a class-action suit by her investors. funny how the market is a self correcting mechanism.
4 posted on
08/06/2002 4:51:12 AM PDT by
mlocher
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
But Faneuil has now told probers she got rid of her shares after he advised her - on Bacanovic's orders - to sell because the firm's then-chief executive, Sam Waksal, was trying to sell out and members of his family were unloading their stock, the Journal reported. This is a CRIME. It's called trading on inside information as a tipee and a tipper. We don't need new laws or regulatory agencies. We need a judicial system where crimes are PROSECUTED EQUALLY.
9 posted on
08/06/2002 8:18:18 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: kattracks
The guy looks like he stepped off of the cover of GQ or something. Call me a cynic, but I can't escape the feeling that Mr. Bacanovic's success had to do more with his social skills than it did his financial abilities.
10 posted on
08/06/2002 8:24:54 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: kattracks
I'm no Martha fan, but I have yet to see any smoking gun evidence. I wonder why the media is so eager to get Martha?
11 posted on
08/06/2002 5:51:18 PM PDT by
TBall
To: kattracks
If Martha sold at $58 per shr, that would mean that she sold on Dec 28. On Dec 28 Imclone was down about 5 pts from the previous day and was off of a $75 high put in on Dec 6. Techinally Imclone was quite weak when she sold. Once again, I'm no fan of Martha.
13 posted on
08/06/2002 8:04:43 PM PDT by
TBall
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson