Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The deafening silence about the death of an affirmative action 'hero'
Jewish World Review ^ | August 7, 2002 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/07/2002 8:27:26 AM PDT by alloysteel

Dr. Patrick Chavis is dead. Will the liberal politicians and gullible media who made him a poster boy for government-imposed affirmative action shed a single tear, or will they continue to ignore what a shameful tragedy his life became?

According to a Los Angeles County Sheriff's detective I spoke with last week, Chavis was murdered on the night of July 23 in Hawthorne, an economically depressed neighborhood on the southern edge of Los Angeles. Three unknown assailants shot him during an alleged robbery at a Foster's Freeze. They remain on the loose. The news has yet to be reported anywhere else, but sources told me it was the buzz of the Los Angeles medical community last week.

Seven years ago, Chavis became the toast of the media elite and the racial preference crowd when he was profiled lavishly by New York Times magazine writer Nicholas Lehmann. Chavis, who made the cover of the magazine, was a black physician admitted to the University of California-Davis medical school under a special racial-preference quota. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court later struck down the program after a landmark challenge by white applicant Allan Bakke. Lehmann contrasted what he considered Bakke's unremarkable career following the lawsuit with Chavis' noble and booming ob-gyn practice in the ghetto of Compton.

Three months later, Jane Fonda's ex-husband, left-wing California politico Tom Hayden, heaped praise on Chavis in defense of affirmative action. "Bakke's scores were higher," Hayden wrote in an article for The Nation, "but who made the most of his medical school education? From whom did California taxpayers benefit more?" Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards in the name of racial diversity. The doctor, Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor families."

What the New York Times never got around to reporting, as JWR columnist Jeff Jacoby first noted and journalist William McGowan later chronicled in his award-winning book Coloring the News, is that the "difference" Chavis made in the lives of several young black women involved gruesome pain-and death-as a result of botched "body sculpting" operations at his clinic.

An administrative law judge found Chavis guilty of gross negligence and incompetence in the treatment of three patients. Yolanda Mukhalian lost 70 percent of her blood after Chavis hid her in his home for 40 hours following a bungled liposuction; she miraculously survived. The other survivor, Valerie Lawrence, also experienced severe bleeding following the surgery; after Lawrence's sister took her to a hospital emergency room, Chavis barged in and discharged his suffering patient-still hooked up to her IV and catheter-and also stashed her in his home.

Tammaria Cotton bled to death and suffered full cardiac arrest after Chavis performed fly-by-night liposuction on her and then disappeared.

In 1998, the Medical Board of California suspended Chavis' license, warning of his "inability to perform some of the most basic duties required of a physician." In a statement filed by a psychiatrist, the state demonstrated Chavis' "poor impulse control and insensitivity to patients' pain." A tape recording of "horrific screaming" by patients in Chavis' office revealed the doctor responding callously: "Don't talk to the doctor while he is working" and "Liar, liar, pants on fire."

If Allan Bakke, the white doctor, had engaged in such disgraceful behavior and met such an ignominious end, you can bet the Left would never let us forget it.

But Ted Kennedy and Tom Hayden, who spoke so voluminously about the poor black patients who supposedly benefited from medical affirmative action, had nothing to say about the poor black women who were brutally victimized by the incompetent Chavis. As for the New York Times, Bill McGowan wrote: They "ran nothing to amend their false portrait of an affirmative action hero, or question the legitimacy of the race-conscious social policy that had made him a doctor. A riveting, nationally newsworthy story central to the country's discussion of racial preferences somehow ended up completely falling through the cracks."

Will the Times editors bother to run an obituary about their fallen affirmative action hero? Will Ted Kennedy send his condolences?

Don't hold your breath.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; allanbakke; bidenvoters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
The real reason that "affirmative action" is so strongly resisted. Guaranteed incompetence in the minority communities. Merely attending medical school is not enough, there has to be some effort to learn and apply what is taught there.
1 posted on 08/07/2002 8:27:26 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The janitor also "attends" medical school. And probably has as much skill.

Oh, well. As long as he meant well is all that counts to idiot liberals.
2 posted on 08/07/2002 8:32:38 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Scoring political points is more important to left-wing nitwits than the death and suffering created by their policies.
3 posted on 08/07/2002 8:33:06 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The doctor, Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor families."

Yeah, he was hurting them severely or killing them – much the same "difference" many families experience during and/or after an encounter with a Kennedy.

No wonder Ted admired him so.

4 posted on 08/07/2002 8:35:53 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards . . .

What do these limo-lib hypocrites care if the rest of us are butchered by unqualified docs? They can afford the best doctors in the world themselves, and wouldn't be caught dead in the office of one of these quacks they turned loose on their fellow Americans.

5 posted on 08/07/2002 8:41:50 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards . . .

What do these limo-lib hypocrites care if the rest of us are butchered by unqualified docs? They can afford the best doctors in the world themselves, and wouldn't be caught dead in the office of one of these quacks they turned loose on their fellow Americans.

6 posted on 08/07/2002 8:42:20 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Interesting story. Apparently, a book was written about the news coverage of "Dr." Chavis. See this excerpt:

The Los Angeles Times, which had profiled Chavis in glowing terms as a victim of white racism several years before, reported Chavis’s suspension, as well as the gruesome details behind it when the story first broke. But it took more than two months for the paper to identify him as the same Dr. Patrick Chavis who allegedly made the case for affirmative action. And even when it did get around to tackling that angle of the story, the LA Times did so in the most anguished and ambiguous terms, giving space to defenders of affirmative action who rejected the notion that Chavis’s downfall stood for anything larger than one man’s weakness and allowing Chavis himself to call the official sanctions against him “a lynching.” link.

7 posted on 08/07/2002 8:43:37 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Ted Kennedy looks like he hasn't seen a doctor in decades, but if he has seen one you can be sure it wasn't a black one even if the guy was one of the top-ranked specialists in his field of expertise.
8 posted on 08/07/2002 8:46:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Will Ted Kennedy send his condolences?

Not so fast. He'll run off that bridge when he comes to it.

9 posted on 08/07/2002 8:49:38 AM PDT by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

10 posted on 08/07/2002 8:52:32 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Apparently, a book was written about the news coverage of "Dr." Chavis.

I think there are a lot of other examples of media bias in "Coloring The Press".
I heard the author interviewed on The Dennis Prager Show.

Kudos to Ms. Malkin for pushing this topic into the open while "the media"
puts a press embargo on this subject.
It's conspicuous when one of their darlings is not openly mourned at his passing.
11 posted on 08/07/2002 8:57:13 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
No white doctor would ever have been allowed to practice or to continue to practice, while doing these things. Is this a kindness to minorities, first to let incompetents become MD's on affirmative action, and then cut up their patients to pieces?
12 posted on 08/07/2002 8:57:32 AM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
By himself, Chavis isn't an argument against affirmative action. Single examples do not constitute data. He is, however, a reminder of something Kennedy and the others can't seem to grasp: Urban communities and poor families don't need black doctors, they need good doctors. And when universities admit medical students on grounds other than academic ability, they will turn out fewer doctors who are good.

from "Affirmative Action Can Be Fatal," Jeff Jacoby.

13 posted on 08/07/2002 8:58:37 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Don't you know that the liberal motto is; Use, Abuse and Throw Away.
14 posted on 08/07/2002 9:00:12 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Dr. Chavis, bringing (botched) liposuction to Compton. What a noble and necessary pursuit.
15 posted on 08/07/2002 9:04:21 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Baby Got Back!
16 posted on 08/07/2002 9:16:51 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I've seen the same thing happening in law school. Students admitted on affirmative action, barely squeaking through (they really don't flunk anybody out, after admitting them -- especially affirmative action admittees). Then they go to work and minorities flock to one of their own. Unfortunately, they get terrible representation, and they have no way of knowing it.
17 posted on 08/07/2002 9:21:04 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I seem to recall reading that the great difference Dr. Chavis made in the lives of poor women was aborting their babies. The liposuction machine, I believe, is the same device used for early abortions.
18 posted on 08/07/2002 9:24:38 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards in the name of racial diversity. The doctor, Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor families."

Too bad Chavis never got the opportunity to ply liposuction on Kennedy.

19 posted on 08/07/2002 9:41:19 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Scoring political points is more important to left-wing nitwits than the death and suffering created by their policies.

Don't you think that is why most of us despise these left wing nitwits so much?

20 posted on 08/07/2002 9:58:11 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson