Skip to comments.
The deafening silence about
the death of an affirmative
action 'hero'
Jewish World Review ^
| August 7, 2002
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 08/07/2002 8:27:26 AM PDT by alloysteel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
The real reason that "affirmative action" is so strongly resisted. Guaranteed incompetence in the minority communities. Merely attending medical school is not enough, there has to be some effort to learn and apply what is taught there.
To: alloysteel
The janitor also "attends" medical school. And probably has as much skill.
Oh, well. As long as he meant well is all that counts to idiot liberals.
To: alloysteel
Scoring political points is more important to left-wing nitwits than the death and suffering created by their policies.
3
posted on
08/07/2002 8:33:06 AM PDT
by
Dakmar
To: alloysteel
The doctor, Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor families."
Yeah, he was hurting them severely or killing them much the same "difference" many families experience during and/or after an encounter with a Kennedy.
No wonder Ted admired him so.
4
posted on
08/07/2002 8:35:53 AM PDT
by
dead
To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards . . . What do these limo-lib hypocrites care if the rest of us are butchered by unqualified docs? They can afford the best doctors in the world themselves, and wouldn't be caught dead in the office of one of these quacks they turned loose on their fellow Americans.
To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards . . . What do these limo-lib hypocrites care if the rest of us are butchered by unqualified docs? They can afford the best doctors in the world themselves, and wouldn't be caught dead in the office of one of these quacks they turned loose on their fellow Americans.
To: alloysteel
Interesting story. Apparently, a book was written about the news coverage of "Dr." Chavis. See this excerpt:
The Los Angeles Times, which had profiled Chavis in glowing terms as a victim of white racism several years before, reported Chaviss suspension, as well as the gruesome details behind it when the story first broke. But it took more than two months for the paper to identify him as the same Dr. Patrick Chavis who allegedly made the case for affirmative action. And even when it did get around to tackling that angle of the story, the LA Times did so in the most anguished and ambiguous terms, giving space to defenders of affirmative action who rejected the notion that Chaviss downfall stood for anything larger than one mans weakness and allowing Chavis himself to call the official sanctions against him a lynching. link.
To: alloysteel
Ted Kennedy looks like he hasn't seen a doctor in decades, but if he has seen one you can be sure it wasn't a black one even if the guy was one of the top-ranked specialists in his field of expertise.
To: alloysteel
Will Ted Kennedy send his condolences? Not so fast. He'll run off that bridge when he comes to it.
9
posted on
08/07/2002 8:49:38 AM PDT
by
LTCJ
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative pingIf you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
10
posted on
08/07/2002 8:52:32 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: mountaineer
Apparently, a book was written about the news coverage of "Dr." Chavis.
I think there are a lot of other examples of media bias in "Coloring The Press".
I heard the author interviewed on The Dennis Prager Show.
Kudos to Ms. Malkin for pushing this topic into the open while "the media"
puts a press embargo on this subject.
It's conspicuous when one of their darlings is not openly mourned at his passing.
11
posted on
08/07/2002 8:57:13 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: alloysteel
No white doctor would ever have been allowed to practice or to continue to practice, while doing these things. Is this a kindness to minorities, first to let incompetents become MD's on affirmative action, and then cut up their patients to pieces?
12
posted on
08/07/2002 8:57:32 AM PDT
by
crystalk
To: LibWhacker
By himself, Chavis isn't an argument against affirmative action. Single examples do not constitute data. He is, however, a reminder of something Kennedy and the others can't seem to grasp: Urban communities and poor families don't need black doctors, they need good doctors. And when universities admit medical students on grounds other than academic ability, they will turn out fewer doctors who are good. from "Affirmative Action Can Be Fatal," Jeff Jacoby.
To: alloysteel
Don't you know that the liberal motto is; Use, Abuse and Throw Away.
To: alloysteel
Dr. Chavis, bringing (botched) liposuction to Compton. What a noble and necessary pursuit.
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Baby Got Back!
16
posted on
08/07/2002 9:16:51 AM PDT
by
Dakmar
To: alloysteel
I've seen the same thing happening in law school. Students admitted on affirmative action, barely squeaking through (they really don't flunk anybody out, after admitting them -- especially affirmative action admittees). Then they go to work and minorities flock to one of their own. Unfortunately, they get terrible representation, and they have no way of knowing it.
To: alloysteel
I seem to recall reading that the great difference Dr. Chavis made in the lives of poor women was aborting their babies. The liposuction machine, I believe, is the same device used for early abortions.
To: alloysteel
Sen. Ted Kennedy picked up the banner a year later, calling Chavis "a perfect example" of the need for lowering admissions standards in the name of racial diversity. The doctor, Kennedy crowed, was "making a difference in the lives of scores of poor families." Too bad Chavis never got the opportunity to ply liposuction on Kennedy.
To: Dakmar
Scoring political points is more important to left-wing nitwits than the death and suffering created by their policies. Don't you think that is why most of us despise these left wing nitwits so much?
20
posted on
08/07/2002 9:58:11 AM PDT
by
Mark17
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson