Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
NOT the Lincoln-Clinton style Dictatorship we have now.

My friend. You will not be able to show any parallels between Lincoln and Clinton.

In 1860, presidential candidates did not actively campaign. Too vulgar, don't you know.

Lincoln, although he was in the fight of his life, for the highest office he ever aspired to -- having lost MORE elections that he won -- told his managers, "make NO promises that will bind me." -- this was an honest man.

Having been elected in 1860, it was suggested to him that he might win re-election by renouncing the Emancipation Proclamation. He flatly refused.

He said he would be "damned in time and through eternity" if he betrayed the "black warriors" (are you listening, Lerrone Bennett?) who had fought at Fort Lusustee (sp) and other places.

Ths was not exactly the way that bill Clinton did things.

Walt

130 posted on 08/11/2002 11:53:37 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
They BOTH made use of "executive orders" which are both un-constitutional....
134 posted on 08/11/2002 3:01:58 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson