Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Crooked Hillary] Clinton to give up ImClone exec's donation, [having been caught]
CNN ^ | Saturday, August 10, 2002

Posted on 08/10/2002 7:31:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Reversing course, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would donate thousands of dollars she received from indicted ImClone founder Sam Waksal to charity.

Clinton and a soft money account set up on her behalf by Democrats received $33,000 from Waksal, campaign finance records show.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Saturday, August 10, 2002

Quote of the Day by kristinn

1 posted on 08/10/2002 7:31:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Now the liberal media will spin Hillary's genorosity for giving such a large contribution to charity.
2 posted on 08/10/2002 7:33:01 AM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thank you for the news.
3 posted on 08/10/2002 7:33:37 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Now the liberal media will spin Hillary's genorosity for giving such a large contribution to charity.

Yeah, but will she pick her favorite 'charity', Hamas? ;^)

4 posted on 08/10/2002 7:34:27 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
You're quite welcome
5 posted on 08/10/2002 7:35:10 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hillary Clinton can stay the hell outta Texas. Let her go on vacation with her own husband--if she can find him!
6 posted on 08/10/2002 7:35:36 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Does anyone believe that an arrogant democrap crook like Sammie Waksal didn't also give Hillie campaign CASH, as well? Sam KNOWS the rules don't apply to him, so why follow the campaign contribution limits? Give Hillie a brief case full of cash, for those special purposes, and hope that there is payback in the future. Rich was allowed to buy a pardon, after all.
7 posted on 08/10/2002 7:37:33 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Wonder why they didn't find a Republican to comment on this embarrassment of a flip-flop? If it was a Republican you could bet there would be several Democrats weigh in on it with lots more negative spin.
8 posted on 08/10/2002 7:39:07 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
If it was a Republican you could bet there would be several Democrats weigh in on it with lots more negative spin.

Exactly.

9 posted on 08/10/2002 7:40:14 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
In the past, Clinton has handed over questionable campaign money.

Only after investigations and to cover-up the embarrassing situations. Hillary never volentarily gave up contributions without outrage from the public.

10 posted on 08/10/2002 7:42:29 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Waksal was charged with obstruction of justice and bank fraud in addition to previous securities fraud and perjury charges.

These are the only type of people that would support a Clinton....

11 posted on 08/10/2002 7:43:25 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The remaining $26,000 was donated to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's New York Senate 2000, a soft money account set up on Clinton's behalf.

What's so impressive about this?!

12 posted on 08/10/2002 8:03:54 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
why not return it to the people it was stolen from?
13 posted on 08/10/2002 8:08:19 AM PDT by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Of course, she'll give it to the American Museuum Council............remember them?
14 posted on 08/10/2002 8:21:28 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Not to worry. The Clintons have several charitable trusts in their own name. Senator Clinton will, I'm sure, give this money to a worthy charity, probably the Clinton Family Trust, a 501c(3) entity.

See, she donated it to charity, didn't she?
15 posted on 08/10/2002 8:23:27 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I thought I just heard on Fox News (and so did a friend of mine) that the donation totaled $63,000. So which is correct?
16 posted on 08/10/2002 8:25:10 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Here are two charities that I'm sure are high on the Clinton's list of charitable giving:

Organization Name: Clinton Family Foundation
City: Chappaqua, NY
Code: 4 - A private foundation generally with a 30% deductibility limitation.

Organization Name: Clinton Family Fund
City: Chicago, IL
Code: 4 - A private foundation generally with a 30% deductibility limitation.
17 posted on 08/10/2002 8:35:33 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Yeah, but will she pick her favorite 'charity', Hamas? ;^)

It will. And she'll give Mrs. Arafat another smooch on the cheek while she's handing her the check.

18 posted on 08/10/2002 8:46:28 AM PDT by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson