Posted on 08/11/2002 9:45:51 AM PDT by Jean S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:02:33 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Ann is an embarassment because she obliterates the opportunity for people like me to convert fence-sitting democrats to the GOP. Her tone scares the conservative democrats and moderate democrats who need to be educated regarding the liberal Dem's agenda. If the GOP wants to win elections, conservatives need to appeal to the 75% of the electorate in the middle spectrum. Coulter does not appeal to that portion of the population.
Her tone does not even assist in opening the doors to further discussion. If you think you can govern without the medical community, you had better think again. Small and medium sized medical offices assist more people each day than most incumbent offices do in a week!
While I respect your opinion, you are in a distinct minority. Peggy Noonan is far more insightful and actually has credentials to comment on national affairs. Exactly what are Coulter's credentials?
Policy matters should be more important than personality in political discussion. However, as this entire thread shows, some people are more interested in personality than issue.
While that may be appropriate for 1990's poli sci, it is very "last century".
In our part of the community, I spend more time attempting to address her tone and her perceived racism than in being able to actually address policy and poli sci issues.
No matter what the people in this thread say. I stand by my previous statements. Ann's current tone is a detriment to the GOP and to the conservative movement.
Liberals like to make "personality" an issue in order to divert from the "facts" surrounding liberal issues.
Ann Coulter only adds fuel to the fire by creating a target which can be quoted by every liberal in the nation. While this may be helpful to see books, it does little to convert fence-sitting moderates to the GOP.
I STAND BY MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT AND REITERATE IT
You are an embarrassment.
Apparently, sharp wit escapes you. The fact that this is typically a scumbag liberal shortcoming makes me... suspicious.
See ya 'round,
LH
Exactly what are Coulter's credentials?Well, for starters, here is her biography, from http://www.anncoulter.org/bio.html:
And, she certainly knows how to mobilize the activists on THIS forum.ANN COULTER
Ann Coulter is a lawyer and author of the New York Times best seller, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton. Her most recent book, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, is a number one New York Times Best-Seller.
Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate. She is a frequent guest on many TV shows, including Politically Incorrect, Larry King Live, Hannity and Colmes, The O'Reilly Factor, American Morning With Paula Zahn,
Crossfire, ABCs This Week, Good Morning America, the Leeza Show, and has been profiled in TV Guide, National Journal, Harpers Bazaar, and George Magazine. She was named one of the top 100 Public Intellectuals by federal judge Richard Posner in 2001.Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.
After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.
A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.
Try a Free Republic search for:Plus, she is a BABE!COULTER and COURIC
or
COULTER and CROSSFIRE
or
COULTER and C-SPAN
or
COULTER and CLINTON
or
COULTER and LIBERALS
From:
'Nuff said. :o)Ann Coulter on C-SPAN: SUNDAY (8/11/02) - 8pm Eastern, 5pm Pacific
LIVE discussion thread
www.booknotes.org ^ | August 11, 2002 | C-SPAN Booknotes - 8pm & 11pm (Eastern)
Posted on 08/11/2002 2:14 PM Pacific by RonDog
-- snip --
58 posted on 8/11/02 5:03 PM Pacific by hole_n_one
and
I work in my underwear....
You're kidding, right? An embarrasment? Colter's book is well researched, well documented and well presented. She's not just refuting the liberal's arguments, she's confuting them. That's an embarrasment?
Oh, if you're a liberal, it is an embarrasment!
Huh?!? You must be with the 'Neville Chamberlain wing' of the "conservative movement".
Got any comments regarding the expansion of the GOP voter registration and voter base?
You appear to be thinking with your gonads instead of your brain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.