Posted on 08/12/2002 4:59:52 PM PDT by John Jorsett
I just heard on the Roger Hedgecock show (AM 600 in San Diego, California) Susan Fey, member of the San Diego County Board of Education, that California has issued a directive that home schooling, being done as it is by uncredentialed parents, "is not an authorized exemption from mandatory public school attendance." Hedgecock has the directive in hand and will be following up to see what's going on. On the face of what I heard read on the radio, it sounds like the California Dept. of Education is going to require all students to attend public school. For those wanting more, I suggest watching the RogerHedgecock.com web site. He'll probably be posting more info on this.
I believe the word you were looking for was .
The office of the Calif. Dept. of Education has been saying this for years. Along with the piece of paper that says homeschooling is not "authorized" comes the three options parents may use to homeschool. In other words, we haven't authorized it, here's what you gotta do to homeschool. They're morons.
They have over and over and over and over again demonstrated their willful ignorance of the education code and they're always trying to look like tough guys. If you want to know what the LAW is in your state, contact Home School Legal Defense Association or the homeschool organization IN YOUR STATE. Don't ask the government.
Check it for spelling and grammer!
The office of the Calif. Dept. of Education has been saying this for years. Along with the piece of paper that says homeschooling is not "authorized" comes the three options parents may use to homeschool. In other words, we haven't authorized it, here's what you gotta do to homeschool. They're morons.
I'm not a home-schooler so I don't know all the hoops, but the way it was presented, this directive represented a major policy shift. Something was said about not processing affidavits any more. The fact that a member of the Board of Ed was calling in to get the word out about it, having just received it, indicates that something significant has happened.
Since this is outside my area of experience, I'll bow out now and let the home schoolers follow up on this. Just wanted to let you all know what I'd heard.
Umm, that would be grammar. Obviously you were not home-schooled.
For a more detailed analysis of home schooling in California, see CaliforniaA Legal Analysis.
Compulsory School Age
|
Option: 1 |
Option: 2 |
Option: 3 |
Legal Option: |
Qualify as a private school |
Use a private tutor |
Enroll in an independent study program through the public school |
Attendance: |
None |
175 days per year, 3 hours per day |
As prescribed by the program |
Subjects: |
Same as the public schools and in the English language |
Same as the public schools and in the English language |
As prescribed by the program |
Qualifications: |
Must be "capable of teaching" |
Teacher certification |
None |
Notice: |
File an annual affidavit with the county superintendent between October 1 and 15 |
None |
A de facto part of the enrollment process |
Recordkeeping: |
Maintain an attendance register |
None |
As prescribed by the program |
Testing: |
None |
None |
As prescribed by the program |
|
Option: 4 |
Legal Option: |
Enroll in a private school satellite program, taking ";independent study" |
Attendance: |
As prescribed by the program |
Subjects: |
As prescribed by the program |
Qualifications: |
Must be "capable of teaching" |
Notice: |
None |
Recordkeeping: |
As prescribed by the program |
Testing: |
As prescribed by the program |
Compulsory Attendance Ages: | "between the ages of 6" by Dec. 2 (§ 48200) and under 18 years of age." California Education Code § 48200, 48400, 48410. |
Required Days of Instruction: | 175 days, only for public schools. |
Required Subjects: | English and must "offer instruction in the several branches of study required to be taught in the public schools." Grades 1-6: English, mathematics, social sciences, science, fine arts, health, physical education. |
Home School Statute: None.
Alternative Statutes Allowing for Home Schools: Home Schools have 4 options:
In February 1986, the Santa Maria Municipal Court ruled, in two home school cases handled by HSLDA, that the compulsory attendance statute is void because of its unconstitutional vagueness and upheld the right of home schools to operate as private schools. People v. Darrah, No. 853104 (Santa Maria Mun. Ct. Mar. 10, 1986); People v. Black, No. 853105 (Santa Maria Mun. Ct. Mar. 10, 1986).
Furthermore, in Institute of Creation Research v. Honig,Civil No. 90-0483-B-(M), January 29, 1992, the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of California ordered ... "a private K-12 school is not within the jurisdiction of the State Department of Education for the purpose of approval of courses or course content or issuance of regulations, except as provided by law" (p. 3). This ruling would apply to all home schools that file a private school affidavit.
Teacher Qualifications: None, if home school registers as a private school, or enrolls in an independent study program with a private school.
Certification is necessary only if the home school parent chooses to qualify as a private tutor.
Standardized Tests: Not required by statute.
In other words, it has nothing to do with Ms. Dey, or anyone else in power in California, actually believing that homeschooling is bad for kids. It's just a way to greatly increase the amount of money they get. Just typical greedy, hate-filled liberal politics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.