Posted on 08/13/2002 1:41:35 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:08:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
August 13, 2002 -- 'I AM surprised at your lack of courage, Mr. Pipes," one reader scolded me. "Your point of view is for people who believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus," opined another. "You really dropped the ball on this one!" "I hope you are not beginning to lose your nerve." "Totally wrong." Or, more charitably: "Maybe your hope is overshadowing your understanding of the truth."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Ahh, but it is. Military defeat, loss of an empire, and military invasion of the heartland tend to open one's mind to new paradigms.
I submit for your consideration that God is life and life is sacred. The opposite of God is Satan. Satan is death and death is sacred. Those who believe it is in dying that they achieve God's purpose are following a mistaken theology. Dying is easy. Living is the challenge. Living is jihad. Those who seek to kill and destroy are serving their god and will live eternally in his presence. Those who serve life, serve their God and will live eternally in His presence. There is no middle ground.
Until all mankind reveres and holds sacred the gift of life, there will be no peace. Until mankind makes the enemies of God their footstool, there will be no return of Goodness. Until all adherents of one God stand together against evil, this horror will continue, and that, my friends, is what Satan counts on most. His time is up when we figure it out and implement the belief.
The religion must adapt to modern mores.This can be done. One recent example: In May, the Turkish religious authorities ruled - completely contrary to Islamic custom - to permit women to pray next to men and to attend mosque services while menstruating.
Anyone want to have a stab at what century of civilization they have entered with such a grand gesture?
And to think that some American parents got upset about a surprise "thong check" for violations of a school dress code.
The two biggest tasks for arab nations to consent to are open practice of other religions and conversion from islam to other religions.
Anything else betrays the notion of islam being a peaceful religion. If the citizens are not free to choose their faith and exercise it (under penalty of death) then they are not free. Their religion dominatates that freedom.
Sounds like the reasoning of a lib who refuses to accept a fetus as being a living being. It's much easier to solve the problem of unwanted or improper pregancies if we just take that concept off the table.
1. Usama ibn Laden is a practising Muslim, and thus, our brother in Islam. He has made many sacrifices for the Deen, in particular, the Jihaad of Afghanistan. While we respect him for this, we do not raise any person to any position, except that which Allah Ta'ala wishes.
2. He himself has denied involvement. Why should we then doubt him? Even if a billion Kuffaar say the opposite, the word of a single practising Muslim is more acceptable to us.
3. It was an Islamic duty for the Taliban to have destroyed the idols.
Don't think that they respect our Christian monuments/sites/buildings/etc. any more than the Buddahs.
Remember that hostage situation at the Church of the Nativity?
Their calendar isn't much farther ahead than that figure either...
Or do you knock out the leader. Kill their followers (the ones who empower them) and instill your own reforms?
1 And the dragon stood on the shore of the sea. And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. He had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on his horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.
2 The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.
It's a family feud,
Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah, on down to David and to Yeshua.
Abram, Ishmael, on down to Muhammad and to...
So far (nearly a year later from 9/11) I have yet to see/hear/read any PR campaign from the muslims distancing themselves from the Islamists. I'd heard a few people say that it is just the actions of a few individuals but there has been no denouncement of the actions of the Islamists.
I've been exposed to PR campaigns that the Palestinians children just want to grow up to be wonderful people like Albert Einstein, Charlie Chaplin, John Lennon, and Ghandi but they can't because of violent Jews. I've been exposed to PR campaigns that the arab states want peace if only Israel would come to the table and sign their treaty. I've been exposed to PR campaigns that "I am an American".
Nothing to say: "We do not support the destruction of the ancient buddah statues". "If my nation goes to war, I'll fight side by side with you against the Islamists".
They can't hate us any more than they already do...
There may have been some principles of nazism that were "positive" but I'm not going to go looking for them. Some socialists would be proud of the notion of improving transportation (and creating the "peoples" car), funding state sponsored arts, etc..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.