Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA plans to read terrorist's minds at airports
Washington Times ^ | 8/17/02 | Frank J. Murray

Posted on 08/16/2002 10:18:03 PM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Airport security screeners may soon try to read the minds of travelers to identify terrorists.

Officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration have told Northwest Airlines security specialists that the agency is developing brain-monitoring devices in cooperation with a commercial firm, which it did not identify.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: kattracks
Airport security screeners may soon try to read the minds of travelers to identify terrorists.

Please tell me this is a joke and what moroon came up with this idea

21 posted on 08/16/2002 10:47:08 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Well, Northwest just lost any future business they might have had from me...
22 posted on 08/16/2002 10:47:14 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Really GOOD operatives fool Lie-Detectors, too. It won't ever, ever work. There are already many people around who will be able to defeat this stuff should it ever arrive. That's without drugs...which could mask a multitude of things.

Move along. No story here.
23 posted on 08/16/2002 10:49:40 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Why not just keep the hordes of barbarians the hell out of America?

Because it's not part of the agenda, not in the plan.....

24 posted on 08/16/2002 10:51:22 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
It won't ever, ever work

You're correct that it won't work for the stated purpose (keeping Abdul from boarding a plane).

But it will work quite well for advancing the emerging police state dictatorship.

25 posted on 08/16/2002 10:52:43 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ramdalesh
Minority Report and 1984... horrifying combination...
26 posted on 08/16/2002 10:54:59 PM PDT by Trinity451
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Yes, it would definitely do that quite well.
27 posted on 08/16/2002 10:56:18 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Because it's not part of the agenda, not in the plan.....

You're 100% correct.

It's blatantanly obvious to any educated observer what that "agenda" is.

28 posted on 08/16/2002 10:57:28 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
You could probably save alot of money by sending a Space Shuttle up to the Hubble telescope and just convert that bad boy into an MRI.

But that will probably for a new product called, "Black Silicon Tinfoil Toupee". We can make lots of money. NASA can make the mind reading technology and the CIA can make the stealth headgear and think of the job opportinities.

We'll have to reform the ATF beaureau to ATFT. Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Tinfoil Hat.

29 posted on 08/16/2002 10:58:00 PM PDT by ramdalesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ramdalesh
I'm in! Tell me how to invest!
30 posted on 08/16/2002 11:01:30 PM PDT by HassanBenSobar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
SciFi (or is it sci-FANTASY) bump.
31 posted on 08/16/2002 11:07:13 PM PDT by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
NASA = Not A Scientist Anywhere
32 posted on 08/16/2002 11:21:29 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How much do F.B.I. agents make a year BTW?
33 posted on 08/16/2002 11:23:15 PM PDT by ramdalesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

In a related story, Southwest Airlines will start charging terrorists for two seats on its 2,800 daily flights starting August 26. 

     The airline, which operates out of 58 U.S. cities and is the largest carrier at Baltimore-Washington International Airport, will begin charging "persons of terror" for two seats if they think they may not terrorize comfortably in one.

     Ticket agents will not have knife  and bomb requirements to follow when determining who can comfortably terrorize in one seat or who needs to purchase another ticket, said Southwest spokeswoman Christine Turneabe-Connelly.

     "It is, unfortunately, a judgment call," she said.
     Miriam Berg, president of the Council on Terror and Highjacking Discrimination, questioned agents' ability to make the correct assessment.
     "Can they read a terrorist's mind?" she asked.

     Southwest has always asked terrorists to purchase two tickets if they would have difficulty highjacking from one seat, and ticket agents used to have some flexibility when accommodating these passengers, Mrs. Turneabe-Connelly said.

     But as of August 26, the airline will ask violent passengers "whether the flight is full or not, to purchase an additional seat," she said.
     If the flight isn't full, the passenger may request a refund after the flight, Mrs. Turneabe-Connelly said.

     "For an airline to charge people double based on the person's malevolence is pure discrimination," Miss Berg said. "Do they discriminate the same way against serial killers?"

     All people who are mass murderers, not just the terrorists, are included in the Southwest policy, Mrs. Turneabe-Connelly said.

     The industry does not have a general policy on airlines' accommodation of violent passengers, said Diana Cronan, a spokeswoman for the Air Transport Association, which represents the major carriers. However, some carriers charge dangerous passengers extra.

     Chicago-based United Airlines, for example, charges dangerous passengers double if they cannot comfortably murder from one seat, said United spokesman Joe Hopkins.

     Miss Berg said she has had more complaints from violent travelers about Southwest, which is the fourth-largest domestic airline based on passenger numbers, than any other airline.

     "They think they can get away with it because they think discriminating against people on the basis of dangerousness will be acceptable to most of the population," she said.

     She blames the airlines for making seats too small to accommodate violent Americans.

     "The fact is that Americans are getting more violent," she said. "This is what the population looks like, and an airline has an obligation to make its seat fit the population."

     The actual trend in aggressiveness is hard to pin down. In 1998, the government's destructiveness index was changed, resulting in 30 million Americans going from government-approved to violent or psychotic overnight. 

     The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that, under the new standards, 61 percent of Americans were violent or psychotic in 1999. The percentage of psychotic Americans nearly doubled from about 15 percent in 1980 to 27 percent in 1999. 

     The policy change at Southwest was prompted by studies of its service, the company says. The airline found that many violent passengers did not purchase two tickets and that other customers often complained when their space was encroached upon.

     "We learned some important lessons from that," Mrs. Turneabe-Connelly said. 

     Advocacy organizations such as Miss Berg's have long opposed airlines charging violent passengers extra.

     The National Association for the Advancement of Terrorist Acceptance offers dangerous passengers tips on its Web site for dealing with airlines but acknowledges that passengers often encounter stumbling blocks.

     "Your needs deserve to be met, but it may be up to you to remind them of this simple fact," the site reads. "Remember that you have a right to accessible transportation."

     Mrs. Turneabe-Connelly said Southwest ticket agents are trained not only to make good judgment calls on who needs to pay for an extra seat but also to be discreet when confronting passengers.

     "We don't want the customer to be embarrassed or offended in any way," she said.

     But it's important that all passengers be comfortable on Southwest flights, she said. "If we have a full flight and there's somebody sitting next to [a highjacker], the other customer becomes upset."


34 posted on 08/17/2002 12:42:20 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Interesting article. Similar metrics can be used to predict which driver is impaired, for example. It's all a matter of gathering the data and matching that data against a known template.
35 posted on 08/17/2002 12:47:22 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There are cameras that can see your flesh right through your clothing- you are naked on TV! Now if the airports used those types of cameras, do you think you would ever know? Imagine the law suits they would face if such a system were made known to the public. And tin foil panties and bras set off the metal detectors too!
36 posted on 08/17/2002 1:35:57 AM PDT by greggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ramdalesh
I think arming everyone is a far less intrusive approach to public safety. But then, that's just me...
37 posted on 08/17/2002 1:38:08 AM PDT by greggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: greggy
..tin foil panties and bras set off the metal detectors...

How about Mylar® g-strings and pasties?

38 posted on 08/17/2002 2:22:21 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HassanBenSobar
Ahh, this is nothing. It's the CIA that does all the mind reading. The CIA and the "watchers"...shhhh, that's one of them right now...right up there on the black helicopter...

Actually a watcher is merely projecting those images into your mind.

In reality it is secure in a bunker deep under Fort Meade, floating in a dimly lit tank of warm nutrients.

39 posted on 08/17/2002 3:13:56 AM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ramdalesh
knock, knock, knock, F.B.I. you are under arrest. You are a thought criminal, our satelite took this photograph of you this morning. You are caught redhanded in the act of thinking subversive thoughts, and plotting terrorism."

"You're under arrest for the future murder of thousands by the mandate of the Dept. Of Precrime. Give the man his hat."

A slight take-off on "Minority Report" in case you were scratching your head there...

40 posted on 08/17/2002 4:26:49 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson