Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Is Opposition? [WSJ Editorial on the NYTimes]
Wall St. Journal ^ | Aug 19, 2002 | Editorial

Posted on 08/19/2002 2:07:45 AM PDT by The Raven

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

We're pleased, we guess, that the New York Times thought our article on Iraq by Brent Scowcroft last Thursday was important enough to lead its front page two days in a row. We'd be more pleased, though, if instead of trumpeting our story to advance a tendentious theme, the Times kept its opinions on its editorial page.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; scowcroft; times
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: OneidaM; rintense; mtngrl@vrwc; McLynnan; Wphile; twyn1; ladyinred; lawgirl; MJY1288; admiralsn; ...
BUMP!!
21 posted on 08/19/2002 5:20:05 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Bump.
22 posted on 08/19/2002 5:23:18 PM PDT by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Hey, SAM, this is decidedly off topic, but we're heading to Ft. Knox tomorrow! Graduation is Wednesday!
Hooah!!
23 posted on 08/19/2002 5:31:13 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I disagree with this sentence: Its current stance shows how little faith an increasingly elitist left now has in promoting democracy and U.S. principles.

It is not a matter of little faith in the agenda of promoting democracy, it is a matter of a different agenda altogether. The is, well, the left, not in favor of US principles, let alone promoting them overseas.

24 posted on 08/19/2002 5:42:22 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven; OneidaM
Good reading, thanks.
25 posted on 08/19/2002 5:46:09 PM PDT by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I do not know if this violates any protocol, but I am curious. Who is graduating from what at Ft Knox?
26 posted on 08/19/2002 5:49:13 PM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thanks for the ping, ohioWfan!!!

Although........far be it from ME to absolutely revel in the pilloring of the NYT!
27 posted on 08/19/2002 5:51:30 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny
Whoo Wee! Thanks for the ping, Snow Bunny !



_____________________________




Rummy, you tell the Brits to keep sifting the dirt for Osama.
Next up? SADdam ! Let's get him!

28 posted on 08/19/2002 6:03:27 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All


29 posted on 08/19/2002 6:03:53 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Way cool - thanks for the bump !!
30 posted on 08/19/2002 6:07:43 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
This is an "about time" bump!
31 posted on 08/19/2002 6:17:28 PM PDT by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thanks for the ping. Only the NY Times would have a problem with the President listening to a wide range of opinion as he makes his decision. I see it as a good thing. It wouldn't matter whether W made his decision in a vacuum or consulted with thousands, the NY Times would express their irrelevant dissatisfaction.
32 posted on 08/19/2002 6:18:10 PM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Radix
LOL! My son is graduating from Basic Training at Ft. Knox. He's 18, and in the Army Reserves, heading for AIT at Ft. Lee, VA on Friday.

We haven't seen him since the 10th of June.

34 posted on 08/19/2002 6:29:56 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Far be it from you, indeed, justshe! Michael Barrone did the same thing on Special Report.......this is just glorious!
35 posted on 08/19/2002 6:32:30 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: McLynnan
The operative word being irrelevant. They are rotting in their own self-important swill.
36 posted on 08/19/2002 6:34:33 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Great article! It seems the Wall Street Journal is getting sick and tired of the New York Slimes.
37 posted on 08/19/2002 6:35:09 PM PDT by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
I wonder when the NY Times's readers will realize they're being fed a pack of lies.
38 posted on 08/19/2002 6:37:59 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Meek,
That is 1 of the coolest posts that I have ever seen here in my short tenure.Thank you!
39 posted on 08/19/2002 7:09:10 PM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The NY Times forgets there are a lot of people in flyover country who don't hang on their every word.
40 posted on 08/19/2002 7:20:21 PM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson