Posted on 08/26/2002 9:13:06 AM PDT by narses
This is the liberal, Democrat line.
The goods of the earth are not "zero sum." Why doesn't the Vatican ever stress the importance of free-market systems in making a bigger pie, thus affording more for everybody?
Population growth is not a "problem". See how insidiously the zeitgeist infects even the minds of those who should know better?
Because "affording more for everybody" is not an absolute good and end in itself?
Just guessing.
-- "The goods of the earth are a unique patrimony of all of humanity.
-- "Their distribution must be regulated by justice and accompanied by love
-- "The richer countries must take a serious look at their lifestyle, which is consuming an inordinate share of the goods of the earth.
How do these positions differ from the positions of, say, Kofi Anan or Al Gore, or indeed, the ultra-left wing globalist enviro-wackos?
What, REALLY, does a statement that one's posessions or the global distribution of goods must be "REGULATED WITH JUSTICE"... what exactly, does that mean, and what could those words someday be construed to mean down the road? Justice according to whom?
Not in a zero sum universe, to be sure.
Redistribution of wealth only works in a voluntary setting, such as religious communities.
Soviet-style "share the wealth" schemes are colossal failures.
What would be your solution for the "have nots"?
Nor in any other, sinkspur. Man's end is not in material wealth, no mater how it's created.
The Church is not in the business of endorsing or condemning economic systems as such.
No, the real profound moral crisis is the spreading of lies and half-truths that is the main tool of the envirosocialist movement that is apparently infecting the Church as well. I am also saddened that the Church felt it necessary to time a response to the Socialist Summit in the South. I suspect they did so in an attempt to pre-respond to calls for population control, but the rest of the position presented in this brief article will only provide support for more population control.
The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace published the book, an overview of church teaching on environmental issues.
Official Catholic teaching on the environment is based on the belief that creation is a gift of God that must be protected, used responsibly and shared equitably, said a new Vatican book.
Does the utopian Marxism in this book reflect the author, the publisher or the entire Corporation ?
This treatise is founded on the belief that G-d does not exist and this Corporation is in charge!
2Ch. 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble
themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive
their sin and will heal their land.
chuck <truth@Y'shuaHaMashiach>
That's of course true. But the Church spends significant political capital in chastising the "wealthy" countries for their consumption, yet it is the wealthy countries who distribute millions of dollars in aid every year to the third world.
The Church is not in the business of endorsing or condemning economic systems as such.
Really? John Paul II spent his life condemning and fighting against Marxism.
No poor man was ever helped by condemning a rich man.
It certainly can be and in some places it is a problem.
That some we disapprove of have similar ideas does not render those ideas incorrect. When one sees these statements one must keep in mind the principle of subsidiarity which Anan and Gore prolly haven't even heard of, or, if they have, they would surely reject
Please cite were Marx "never hesitated to make explicit the relationship between a creation-based spirituality and care for the environment that is for all of God's creation."
Your antiCatholicism is boorish
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.