[Mark Felton]

"The Constitution works fine when applied."

Indeed yes. But,

1) How do we know if the Constitution has been violated when the hard evidence is kept from the people?, and,

2) Who would prosecute the offender if the current President puts the brakes on the Dept of Justice?, and

3) Would the prosecution of Clinton undermine the confidence of the American people in the integrity of our Presidency?

Perhaps our current form of government remains more stable if the Constititution is not rigourously applied in matters that directly deal with corrupt elements of the government. "Keep the people unaroused" might be the approach preferred by President Bush.

[Jim Robinson]

Well, it was just my opinion. You and Klayman are welcome to continue your fishing expeditions til hell freezes over as far as I'm concerned. It's your time and your dime. But I do believe you're looking in all the wrong places and for all the wrong things and for all the wrong reasons. Clinton is done. Toast. History. He got away with it. It's now between him and his maker. You want to go after a Clinton, make it Hillary. She's a thousand times more dangerous to our future than Bill.

[jamaksin]

Let's not forget Writs of Mandamus!

[F16Fighter]

Good post...

As far as I'm concerned, until Bubba answers for his crimes, this country will never be the same. Why should Dubya enact his own statute of limitations -- especially regarding the XPOTUS? The "letting bygones be bygones" attitude of indifference by the Bush administration is suspiciously disturbing.