And what does it say about the corrupt nature of our government when private individuals must personally fund the prosecution of criminals?
There are definitely bigger fish to fry, but should we overlook misdemeanors because felonies are being committed? Should we overlook tax evaders because murders are unsolved?
A criminal is a criminal. They should be prosecuted by the government no matter what privilege of rank they may have.
When you are right you are right, and boy are you right about that one.
However, it does beg a fair question. Since Bill Clinton's administration was so very slimy then perhaps digging up enough dirt on it and keeping it in the public eye just might serve to put a damper on Hillary's political ambitions. The Marc Rich pardon is awfully stinky. It's got that deep, nauseating, long term kind of stink that just keeps on giving. I'm not sure she's tricky enough to avoid a load of dirt that stinky. Remember that whole "Two for the price of one, co-presidents" spiel they did early in their career? Can she really distance herself from all that?
Of course, on the surface this looks like nothing more that the powerful protecting the powerful. But it could very well be that the Bush team is well-aware that if they push this issue the democrats and their pals in the elitist Media will immediatley go into full-scale "victim" mode...."Can't we just move on?", "Leave those poor Clintons alone", "You failed to convict him, now get over it", etc.
Of course all this information will come out eventually, and the Clinton spinners will desperately try to crucify the messenger...But that messenger will not be GWB.
Not often I reply, let alone twice to ANYONE'S replies; however, I once again say YES, AND AMEN!
One slight correction, the correct title for the wicked witch of the left wing is sinator hillary!
;-)
This is a very profound, accurate statement. One adage I learned in business economics 101 was that advertising itself is successful, because it creates name recognition. And even if the result is negative, it still can be positive for the subject advertised. The best thing we can do is put Clinton as far back in our memory as we can. The more of this free advertising Clinton gets, the worse off the rest of us are.
You and I rarely agree anymore,but we are in 100% agreement on this. Baring a miracle,she WILL be elected president in the near future.