Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frohickey
I was hoping like hell that it was abundantly clear what I meant without using one. ;-)
20 posted on 09/01/2002 2:27:41 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
Your sarcastic comments WERE hard to decipher at first,probobly because they actually had some truth buried within. I'm all for private property rights,but in SOME CASES private property owners cannot be trusted to manage their lands.At what point do others need to step in and call a spade a spade? For example,when the forest practices of private property owners affects others,such as when your favorite fishing spots are so degraded by logging operations that you can't even fish there,when landslides start taking people's houses out-The laws might permit them to do these things,but at what point do others affected say enough is enough.I work in the woods,and in the course of doing so,have seen the way private owners treat their land sometimes.To say private owners could manage their lands better is true,to say they do manage their lands well is not always true.Don't start spouting about PPR's,alot of loggers will tell you the privates abuse their lands very often.
21 posted on 09/01/2002 4:00:35 PM PDT by seventhson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson