Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Sustainable' development? There's no such thing
The National Post ^ | 09/03/02 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/04/2002 8:17:31 AM PDT by NeoCaveman

This Labour Day, I thought about the working class, the masses.

No, honestly, I did. Okay, I was on the beach, but the folks around me lying on the sand had jobs they'll be getting back to this morning. They worked. They would be classed as workers. But they're not a homogeneous "working class," they're not conscripts in Karl Marx's "masses." The transformation of Labour Day, from a celebration of workers' solidarity to a cook-out, is the perfect précis of the history of Anglo-American capitalism.

If you want to see what "the masses" are meant to look like, buy a DVD of Metropolis, Fritz Lang's 1926 "expressionist masterpiece." As futuristic nightmares go, it's hilarious: The workers are slaves, living underground, chained to the levers, wheels, cranks and cogs of a vast machine, dehumanized by the crushing anonymity of their servitude, etc., etc.

Alas, nothing dates faster than a futuristic vision: Today, the nightmare that beckons is quite the opposite. Instead of a world in which the workers are forced to operate huge, clanking machines below the Earth all day long, the machines are small and silent and so computerized no manpower is required and the masses have to be sedated by shallow distractions like supersized shakes and Wal-Mart and 24-hour lesbian channels on Premium Cable.

It took the workers' tribunes a while to catch on: Even today, when your average union leader issues his annual Labour Day address, you can tell at heart he still thinks it's 1926 and Metropolis is just around the corner. But the intellectual left has been scrambling for decades to come up with explanations as to why, if everything's so bad, everything's so good: Noam Chomsky's theory of media manipulation -- "manufactured consent" -- can stand for an entire school of philosophers who believe a subtler breed of capitalist overlords are maintaining the workers in some sort of fools' illusion of content.

But, inevitably, this was only going to be an intermediate stage, given that the shimmering mirage seems to be holding up pretty well. The new received wisdom -- forcefully articulated by, among others, Maude Barlow's Council of Canadians at the laugh-a-minute Johannesburg "Earth Summit" -- is that the masses themselves are the problem. The oppressed masses refuse to stay oppressed. If they were down in the basement chained to the great turbines, all would be well. But, instead, they insist on moving out of their tenements, getting homes with non-communal bathrooms, giving up the trolley car, putting a deposit down on a Honda Civic and driving to the mall. When it was just medieval dukes swanking about like that, things were fine: That was "sustainable" prosperity. But now, everyone wants in. And, once you do that, there goes the global neighbourhood.

Thus, Simon Fairlie, in his new pamphlet The Prospect Of Cornutopia, ponders the consequence of a 3% "sustainable" growth rate and immediately spots the catch: by the year 2100 we'll be 18 times wealthier than we are today.

That's the problem? Of course! These days, for your serious media pessimist, the good news is the bad news. As Fairlie frets, "Will each home have 10 rooms and a swimming pool and, if so, where are we going to build them?"

Labrador. Next question.

But to this future of vast, unstoppable, ever-expanding wealth, the champions of the oppressed have come up with an ingenious solution: global poverty! We need a massive Poverty Expansion Program if we're to save the planet. "I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing," says Gar Smith of San Francisco's Earth Island Institute. "I have seen villages in Africa that had vibrant culture and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed by the introduction of electricity," he continues, globally warming to his theme and regretting that African peasants "who used to spend their days and evenings in the streets playing music on their own instruments and sewing clothing for their neighbours on foot-pedal powered sewing machines" are now slumped in front of Dynasty reruns all day long.

George Monbiot, celebrated doom-monger of Britain's Guardian, agrees: "It is impossible not to notice that, in some of the poorest parts of the world, most people, most of the time, appear to be happier than we are. In southern Ethiopia, for example, the poorest half of the poorest nation on Earth, the streets and fields crackle with laughter. In homes constructed from packing cases and palm leaves, people engage more freely, smile more often, express more affection than we do behind our double glazing, surrounded by remote controls."

In Ethiopia, male life expectancy is 42.88 years. George was born in 1963. That may be why the cheery peasants in the fields are cracking up with laughter. They know that even if he moves in tomorrow, they'll only have to endure his column in The Gamo Gofa Times-Herald for three years. No wonder they're doubled up and clutching their sides. It's not just the dysentery from the communal latrine.

To measure the distance we've travelled, consider the words of Peter J. McGuire, General Secretary of the Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, proposing 120 years ago the first Labour Day. It would be an occasion, he said, to honour those "who from rude nature have delved and carved all the grandeur we behold."

What a crazy! Nature's rude and all the grandeur comes from man? What fossil fuel is he inhaling? He should listen to the great Canadian sage David Suzuki, who in a recent column headlined "We're All Animals Here" wrote:

"The sign in the shopping mall said, 'No animals allowed.' As I read it, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. It reflected a failure to admit or unwillingness to acknowledge our biological nature. We are animals and have a taxonomic classification: Kingdom -- Animalia, Phylum -- Chordata, Class -- Mammilia, Order -- Primates, Family -- Hominidae, Genus -- Homo, Species -- sapiens.

"Our reluctance to acknowledge our animal nature is indicated in our attitude to other animals. If we call someone a worm, snake, pig, chicken, mule or ape, it is an insult. Indeed, to accuse someone of being a "wild animal" at a party is a terrible insult."

But evidently not at a Suzuki get-together. Party on, dude! Everyone knows what the sign in the mall means. Suzuki may regret it, but the world we live in is defined not by what we have in common with the cats and dogs and Holsteins and black rhinos but by what separates us. As the Eighth Psalm says:

"What is man that thou art mindful of him ... ? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:

All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field; The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea."

You can say that's a lot of Judeo-Christian hooey. But that's not the point. The Psalmist, regardless of whether he got it from God, has characterized the reality of our lives better than Suzuki's alleged scientific classification does. The Eighth Psalm describes the central fact of our modern existence. It was a lot less plausible when it was written, when man's domain stretched barely to the horizon, when ravenous beasts lurked in the undergrowth, when the oceans were uncharted and the maps dribbled away with the words "Here be monsters ..." Back in those days, if PBS jetsetting finger-wagger Bill Moyers was sitting under some tree in the South African bush bemoaning man as a "cancer on the planet," nobody in Connecticut would be able to hear a word he was yakking on about, oh happy day.

But, over the millennia, the Eighth Psalm has held up, which is more than you can say for Fritz Lang or those 1970s eco-apocalyptics. By contrast, Suzuki's "We're All Animals Here" is a pitiful reductio, an expression not so much of evolutionary theory as devolutionary theory: We've evolved from the beasts, and, with a bit of a nudge from Moyers and Suzuki and PETA, we can evolve back. And if that means those fieldhands in southern Ethiopia have to eke out their four decades in the rustic version of Metropolis, so be it.

There's no such thing as "sustainable" development. Human progress and individual liberty have advanced on the backs of one unsustainable development after another: When we needed trees for heating and transportation, we chopped 'em down. Then we discovered oil, and the trees grew back. When the oil runs out, we won't notice because our SUVs will be powered by something else. Bet on human ingenuity every time. We're not animals, and it's a cult as deranged as the screwiest fringe religion to insist we are. Earth's most valuable resource is us.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: communism; earthsummit; steyn; un
When the oil runs out, we won't notice because our SUVs will be powered by something else. Bet on human ingenuity every time. We're not animals, and it's a cult as deranged as the screwiest fringe religion to insist we are. Earth's most valuable resource is us.

Steyn hits another homerun

1 posted on 09/04/2002 8:17:31 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Ping for your MSLP.
2 posted on 09/04/2002 8:17:57 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Right, there is no such thing, however, its a good concept that allows more development of a world government system, and such a cause empowers the UN, as well.

More global government.

A world tax.

Global environmental wackoism.

All of this boils down to power hungry marxists trying to see how much they can get away with.

3 posted on 09/04/2002 8:20:13 AM PDT by AndrewSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewSmith
All of this boils down to power hungry marxists trying to see how much they can get away with.

You are right on all counts.

4 posted on 09/04/2002 8:23:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
The oppressed masses refuse to stay oppressed. If they were down in the basement chained to the great turbines, all would be well. But, instead, they insist on moving out of their tenements, getting homes with non-communal bathrooms, giving up the trolley car, putting a deposit down on a Honda Civic and driving to the mall.

Outta the park. Here's a great article on the Johannesburg "summit." Apparently, it's such a farce even the eco-Left can't spin their way out of it.

5 posted on 09/04/2002 8:37:34 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
"Will each home have 10 rooms and a swimming pool and, if so, where are we going to build them?"

Hmmm. I'd like to have me one of them! We're going to look at a house today that sits on 6.7 acres and has a swimming pool AND a tennis court! So there, enviro-weenies!

We'd probably confound them all to hell and back though because one of the reasons we wanted such a large piece of land is that we'd like to set up the house with solar hot water to do under the floor radiant heating. And if the price of photovoltaic cells would come down, we might even consider getting off the grid! The house has its own well and septic system, and if we set up a rainwater collection and filtration system, we could be self-sustaining in the middle of MA! Not something they'd expect of a couple of conservatives, is it?

6 posted on 09/04/2002 8:46:24 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Steyn gets 24-hour lesbian channels on his cable? Why don't I get that on my Time Warner system?
7 posted on 09/04/2002 8:49:02 AM PDT by Norman Conquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Conquest
Only Steyn could write an article including Psalm 8 and twentyfour hour lesbian cable channels, he's truly brilliant.
8 posted on 09/04/2002 9:02:35 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Only Steyn could write an article including Psalm 8 and twentyfour hour lesbian cable channels, he's truly brilliant.

Plus, his logic and reasoning are generally impeccable...he's brilliant, indeed!

(thanks for posting!)

9 posted on 09/04/2002 9:14:24 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Wow, there sure is a lot happening over at <a href="http://tracey518.tripod.com/>Click</a>. That site has no name, and I don't know what to call it, but I check in there every day and he's sure on fire with political issues. Seems to be a good place for Conservatives if you read his comments. <p> Thanks for yours.
10 posted on 09/04/2002 9:29:31 AM PDT by AndrewSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
11 posted on 09/04/2002 9:45:15 AM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteamshipTime
Of course such facts go contrary to the policies being promoted by the Poverty Pimps of the NGOs and the Vampire Elite who rule African nations. These groups want aid not trade. The Poverty Pimps earn their living acting as the conduits by which the West passes aid to Third World nations. The Vampire Elite are the people to whom the aid is given. This allows them the luxury of lucrative Swiss bank accounts, fancy cars, the latest defense weapons and other goods.

Great article that you linked.

12 posted on 09/04/2002 9:58:45 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AndrewSmith
-http://tracey518.tripod.com/--
13 posted on 09/04/2002 10:00:21 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AndrewSmith
Cool site.
14 posted on 09/04/2002 10:06:43 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
When it was just medieval dukes swanking about like that, things were fine: That was "sustainable" prosperity.

Exactly - and check out the ads in any environmentalist rag if you want to see who their target audience is - hint, it sure ain't the working class. "Pull up the ladder, I'm aboard" is definitely the agenda.

15 posted on 09/04/2002 10:25:36 AM PDT by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Only Mark Steyn could brighten up the day I'm having. For this, sir, I thank you.
16 posted on 09/04/2002 10:38:09 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch; arete; rohry; LS; meyer; DarkWaters; STONEWALLS; TigerLikesRooster; junta; ...
"I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing," says Gar Smith of San Francisco's Earth Island Institute. "I have seen villages in Africa that had vibrant culture and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed by the introduction of electricity," he continues, globally warming to his theme and regretting that African peasants "who used to spend their days and evenings in the streets playing music on their own instruments and sewing clothing for their neighbours on foot-pedal powered sewing machines",

I assume Gar still uses a manual typewriter and washes his clothes in the creek.

17 posted on 09/04/2002 11:20:07 AM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
"who used to spend their days and evenings in the streets playing music on their own instruments and sewing clothing for their neighbours on foot-pedal powered sewing machines",

I assume Gar still uses a manual typewriter and washes his clothes in the creek.

If you have these manually-powered machines, keep them for Y2K things or museums. Gar wouldn't wash his clothes in the actual creek, but would bring up a bucket of water to heat over his clean-burning, non-smoking campfire. And his roast aurochs steak wouldn't smoke, either.

18 posted on 09/04/2002 11:26:10 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I assume Gar still uses a manual typewriter and washes his clothes in the creek.

I would not want to bet that this is the case.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

19 posted on 09/04/2002 11:27:07 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
sewing clothing for their neighbours on foot-pedal powered sewing machines"...

Machines?!?! How can this be?

snicker

20 posted on 09/04/2002 11:30:34 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Human beings are marvelous in being able to create a better life for themselves and the vistas they've created look even more inviting for every generation that follows. The thing Mark Steyn is making a point about is the post-Marxist Left has inverted the traditional canon of Marxism upside down: traditional Marxists believed in the importance of industrialization and making workers wealthier through the dint of their own efforts than that of the capitalist overlords they replaced. In stark contrast, the post-Marxist Left believes in exalting the simplicity of the primeval life and in ensuring poverty gets distributed equally amongst humanity around the planet. Poor Karl Marx is no doubt spinning in his grave. The Left has completed its own devolution back to the Stone Age whilst the rest of us have long left Fritz Lang's famous dystopia behind in the dust.
21 posted on 09/04/2002 11:38:48 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Reverse Steyn ping
22 posted on 09/04/2002 11:43:06 AM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I assume Gar still uses a manual typewriter and washes his clothes in the creek.

I'm waiting for him to go into Compton to tell allt he black women there that they have to give up their AC,their cars,their sewing machines,their refrigerators,and their tv sets that they watch Oprah and the UBN on. That oughta be REAL interesting!

23 posted on 09/04/2002 1:19:24 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SteamshipTime
from your interesting link:

"But at the same time the Greens have also become more sophisticated. They have massive influence in the halls of the United Nations. This isn't because they are right, but because their power agenda fits in with the agenda of the Third World despots that dominate that world body. This alone is a good reason for the US getting out of the UN immediately. I'm still inclined to think the UN should be relocated to some suitable African city like Harare so they can see first hand the results of their policies."

24 posted on 09/04/2002 3:35:48 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Is this the guy who refuses to use toilet paper and wipes with weeds?
25 posted on 09/04/2002 3:42:52 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AndrewSmith
All of this boils down to power hungry marxists trying to see how much they can get away with.

I'd say that about sums it up.

26 posted on 09/04/2002 5:16:28 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Mark Steyn, you crack me up again. Hooray!
27 posted on 09/08/2002 7:51:08 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson