Given Jim's post, it would seem there's a difference of some sort.
I can understand a typo or misspelling where 20-dollar words are concerned but in the interest of clarity, it's probably a good idea to always make sure we've got our acronyms correct.
It's a little late for midterms, but perhaps by the next round of elections, the FRN will have at the ready the resources which will make it a most valuable resource for Chapters ... online contact information, legislation, legal caveats, regular newsletters, punch lists and the sort of calls to actions whereby the Network and its friends can come to the aid of individual campaigns -- like FR's longtime friend Bob Barr -- who are being targeted nationally for removal by the likes of the useful idiot Libertarians who oppose the WOD for all the wrong reasons.
Unless I'm mistaken, the FRN's purpose is to be of service as best they can to the Chapters. ("Managing" same being clearly out of the question given the legal arm's length between the FRN and the Chapters and the self-governance of the Chapters which ensures the effectiveness that is Subsidiarity rather than some common-denominator top-down homogenousness.) I still have every expectation the FRN will earn a reputation for excellence in this regard once they've had the time to establish themselves and build the resources, contacts and communication pipelines necessary.
In any case, I'm sorry I opened the thread at all and can assure you -- had it been properly titled -- I'd have just passed it by since I'm not in a position to head up a chapter in Louisiana ... although it's a certainty I would participate in and support one as best I could were one started.
I'll be spending tomorrow canvassing my neighborhood with flyers for one local campaign in which I'm particularly interested (Juvenile Court). Lots of folks like me out here who are ready, willing and able to get involved in local campaigns to elect the best man possible ... whether or not it's always a Republican. If there's room for those of us who believe actions speak louder than words (or an "R" behind a candidate's name), we can't wait to be a part of whatever local chapter joins the FRN.
While indeed there is no easier way to provoke me than to cast the slightest doubt on the integrity, objectives or commitment of folks I love, it's true I'm just an honorary member and am not speaking "for" you by any stretch of the imagination.
(Despite Torie's characterization of my posts as "Delphic", I'm not psychic and don't "channel" well.)
So ... best of luck with your busy fall schedule for midterms and rest assured I'll be doing my best to make it back for a FReep one of these days.
Until then, will be sitting on my hands like a good girl and simply hoping for the best where all members of all things "Free Republic" are concerned.
Maybe it's just the way the thread was titled, Ron. It's my understanding the DC Chapter is an "FR Chapter" and purpose of this thread is enlisting FRN Chapters.
JOIN A FR CHAPTER TODAY!!!!!!!!!
FR Network ^ | 9/18/2002 | Diotima
Posted on 09/18/2002 10:39 AM Pacific by diotima
The Free Republic Network
The Front Line of Conservative Activism
As I mentioned in my last response, you're a capable individual. We've met and talked. We've talked on the forum. I'm sure this thread title and opening left no doubt that it was seeking to further the FreeRepublic Network's goal of developing more chapters across the nation. Regardless of whether an FRN or FR appeared in the title, other data made it abundantly clear what the goal was and who was initiating that objective.
Given Jim's post, it would seem there's a difference of some sort.
I believe a careful reading of Jim's comments on this thread would indicate that he desires everyone to gather under the FRN banner for activism. Most have done that and a few have been unable to do so. That is the only difference I am able to see. Personalities aside, I believe that the DC Chapter and the FRN have tried to make the best of this situation. I know as well as you do that there have been comments back and forth. But those who seek to support conservatism will sooner or later put aside personality issues and return to the main objective. I believe that the DC Chapter probably feels that way and I'm sure the FRN does. Our long term goals are likely very similar since our common adversary is liberal marxism and a federal government which knows no limits.
I can understand a typo or misspelling where 20-dollar words are concerned but in the interest of clarity, it's probably a good idea to always make sure we've got our
acronyms correct.
I must admit that I am truly sorry if you were led astray by the omission of the "N".
It's a little late for midterms, but perhaps by the next round of elections, the FRN will have at the ready the resources which will make it a most valuable resource for
Chapters ... online contact information, legislation, legal caveats, regular newsletters, punch lists and the sort of calls to actions whereby the Network and its friends can
come to the aid of individual campaigns -- like FR's longtime friend Bob Barr -- who are being targeted nationally for removal by the likes of the useful idiot Libertarians who oppose the WOD for all the wrong reasons.
The FRN has been developing relationships with other organizations. Those who attended the FRiva Las Vegas Conference learned that we are devising ways to address every issue you have raised here. I'm sorry you were unaware of that. I would encourage everyone to become involved in the FRN, so that they will be up to date on what is taking place and be able to tap into the resources that are being developed.
Unless I'm mistaken, the FRN's purpose is to be of service as best they can to the Chapters. ("Managing" same being clearly out of the question given the legal arm's
length between the FRN and the Chapters and the self-governance of the Chapters which ensures the effectiveness that is Subsidiarity rather than some
common-denominator top-down homogenousness.) I still have every expectation the FRN will earn a reputation for excellence in this regard once they've had the time to establish themselves and build the resources, contacts and communication pipelines necessary.
See, you are aware of what the FRN's goals are. But I am surprised that you didn't know that the FRN has already earned a reputation for excellence in this regard. Ask people who attended the FRiva Las Vegas Conference if they liked the programs and direction the FRN is headed in. I think you'll find that folks who have joined with the FRN are happy with the direction things are headed in, and expect the FRN to become even more effective over time.
In any case, I'm sorry I opened the thread at all and can assure you -- had it been properly titled -- I'd have just passed it by since I'm not in a position to head up a
chapter in Louisiana ... although it's a certainty I would participate in and support one as best I could were one started.
This is the third paragraph in which you addressed the title of this thread. Once again, I'm sorry you were confused, and I'm sure a nearby chapter would be glad to have you as a member.
I'll be spending tomorrow canvassing my neighborhood with flyers for one local campaign in which I'm particularly interested (Juvenile Court). Lots of folks like me out
here who are ready, willing and able to get involved in local campaigns to elect the best man possible ... whether or not it's always a Republican. If there's room for
those of us who believe actions speak louder than words (or an "R" behind a candidate's name), we can't wait to be a part of whatever local chapter joins the FRN.
As a person who voted for Pat Buchanan, and has been accepted into the FRN BoD, I can assure you there is room for people without a (R) behind their name, even though I still do have an (R) behind my name, although it is not a Republican (R).
Good look with your cavassing. I support and applaud your efforts.
141 posted on 9/20/02 9:21 AM Pacific by Askel5