[AM2000]

Musharraf is reneging on his promise to disassociate himself from the terrorists.

[Dog Gone]

He certainly doesn't seem to be using the same best efforts to stop it here as he is in Kirachi. At some point, you have to assume that's intentional.

[swarthyguy]

Sigh, promises, promises -

Only if you believed him in the first place.

[Aaron_A]

Pakis are probably scared of the Kashmir elections...especially when compared to their own. This interview with Blackwill seems to have caught a few people off-guard as they were probably expecting the usual American ambiguity.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/753988/posts

And then there are articles like these:
http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501020923-351277,00.html
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020920/ap_wo_en_po/kashmir_guerrilla_s_tale_3

[cake_crumb]

"Musharraf is reneging on his promise to disassociate himself from the terrorists"

Which brings me to a question I've been trying to find a place to pose:

The official word in India on the ongoing (as far as I know, not being there physically) Gujarat temple siege, is that it is still unknown at this time WHO the terrorists in the temple are or what they represent...

So why has Pakistan's government already - starting way early in the seige - made several official statements regarding the seige, to the affect that the seige is the result of Hindi intolorance (LOL) and is warning that the attack will straing Inda/Pakistan relations???

Rhetorical question. I just went and checked for updates...no one seems to have pointed out the discrepancy yet, so I thought maybe I would.