THE NERVE OF NELSON MANDELA

All men are not created equal. There is but one single explanation for the 6,000 years of strife, the spilling of an ocean of blood, the sacrifice of light years of progress, and the basis for the current global power struggle. All of this is the result of at least two unalterably opposing types of souls, one vicious and animal like, the other enlightened and human, fighting. Both are wrapped in an immortal struggle to dominate one planet.

The goal of any confidence game is to create a sense of doubt about the obvious. Sociopaths, the leaders of more than three billion of the earth's people, operate through the veins of nations, its political structure. But the swindling of retirees out of their savings, or the smooth tongue needed to motivate others to commit immoral or illegal acts is child's play compared to the international drama currently being acted out on the world stage. Let there be no doubt, the draw stings that open and close the intermission curtain, the lighting to control perception (the media), the actors whose lies boggle the mind, all hang from a ventriloquist's string. They want to fool us all.

Even when the plot is hidden, the international players reveal enough for us to figure out the motive, as well as who is pulling their strings. This said, let us focus on Nelson Mandela, who recently emerged from retirement, at 85-years-old, to play a pivotal role in yet another scrimmage between the two great sides. Today the stage is set in the Middle East. The names are only coincidental. In every age there was an American viewpoint and an Iraqi viewpoint, with every man and woman in the world on one side or the other.

Mandela's job is to use his reputation as a persecuted black man, freed from a dungeon in the dessert, in 1990. His very presence impugns a conviction. White people, all white people, locked him away for 26 years of his life. He was branded a hero for all the dark people of the world for opposing white domination.

International brokers, his soul brothers in "high places," took control of Africa's wealthiest nation, placed a living martyr on its throne to reign over an idea far beyond the borders of South Africa. People of color, in this case, the Iraqis, are said to be the perpetual victims, Mandela implies, of nation-thieves, white, western Christians out to rule the world, a desire of their own hearts.

Mandela was strategic. South Africa was merely the staging ground for the false guilt used all around the world, for various scrimmages. Mandela's impact on the rest of the world is psychological and works like a silent weapon. When Mandela speaks, as he did recently, when he accused, "America of introducing chaos in international affairs," it is a strategic chess move. With little to no experience in politics, except the killing of whites and rival Zulu tribesmen, Mandela has no legitimate claim to greatness. There are no intelligent papers penned by Mandela. Others wrote all the speeches he delivered. His thoughts belong to others. He solved none of South Africa's internal problems. He is of average intelligence and has no money other then what was given to him for his role in South Africa's fall. So, how did he become a hero?

Mandela is called one of the world's "tallest" statesmen even before he emerged from his prison cell. Fellow Marxists around the world who created Mandela now want him to use his racial capital to influence President Bush, who is smart enough to refuse to take Mandela's telephone call. It did not take a lot of nerve for Mandela to show his face after reigning over the destruction of South Africa's prosperity. To accuse America is his true nature. Like billions of his soul brothers, Mandela is incapable of creating and building anything. His type waits for others to create and built. Then they infiltrate and take over. I believe apartheid, set aside in 1992, was a feeble, unjust and unworkable attempt, on the part of white South Africans, to separate from the dissimilar personalities obvious in the two rivaling types of humans.

South Africa is now the AIDS capitol of the world, with 55 percent of its black population testing HIV positive, according to the U.N. South Africa also leads the world in violent crime. There are more murders and rapes (per capita) in South Africa than anywhere on the globe. To cover up, Mandela and his successors have created new forms of censorship in order to hide the mess. South Africa's Jesse Jackson, Desmond Tutu, recently asked for American aid, following the mass exodus, since 1994, of more than half of South Africa's commercial farmers. This has cut food production down by 60 percent. The reason for the mass fleeing is the near 1,500 murders of small and large white farmers by black thugs carrying military weapons, possibly distributed by the ANC.

The U.S. media is silent about South Africa's killings and rapes, where white women and even small white children are intentionally infected with the AIDS virus. To suppress the truth about their brethren, world wide, is their job. There are deep and vital reasons why the news is twisted by the elitists.

Western liberals claim that the leopard-like carnage we see in South Africa is due to pent up rage, for years of apartheid. But I disagree. I propose that humans are not created equal and that what we are seeing in South Africa is the evidence that at least some men are endowed with the souls of vicious animals. Like Saddam Hussein, billions of people are dark in nature, murderous without flinching and seem gratified by horror. I further propose that this is not based on race or national origin. In fact more than half the world may belong to this race. Most are not black.

The real reason for the so-called third world is the mentality of the third world. The left says that education; the removal of poverty and the elimination of racism will make men equal in prosperity. But if that were so, America and England would be a heavenly paradise. This is where the most educated people in the world live, work and play. No, education is not the key. Wealth is not it, nor is racial equity. It is spirit gifted with some degree of illumination, without which one cannot see which way to go. No, it is not IQ. It is Spirit. Entire continents like Africa, with 2,000 varieties of vegetables, roots, fruits, legumes and grains, to say nothing of the immense wealth in minerals, diamonds and gold would not have a third of population starving, continuously. Africa could be among the wealthiest continents in the world. But it is not. The spirit is not there. It is here, in America. And everyone knows it. Does that mean that we do not make terrible political misstates? Certainly we do. Nevertheless, that has not stopped heaven's gift basket from falling on us.

Mandela presided over great wealth earned by others and still he left South Africa in chaos. He helped to reduce a wealthy nation to near poverty status. He stands next to Saddam and defends Iraq not because he believes so much in Iraq's cause but because they are brothers in the truer sense that FOX, CNN or ABC can comprehend. Saddam and Mandela are of the same heart and they know it. All of the evil of this world know each other.

North Korea, China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, most of Europe, Asia, Syria, and the majority of the UN Security Council, are all on Saddam's side, no matter their rhetoric. This treatise is not entirely about Mandela. It is about redefining the real nature of our current global conflict, with Iraq in the middle at this time. All the political deviants know each other. It is the people of good-will who are strangers. This is also about every other conflict we have ever had, since a man with one world view bludgeoned his brother, who had a different world view, to death. The friction is eternal. The stakes are higher than ever. No more wooden clubs. Now comes the threat of atomic weapons. Prophets predicted their use. This is the time to know for sure, what side you are on.

Emanuel McLittle has a Masters Degree and two decades of experience in Counseling Psychology. His keen insight, developed over 24 years, makes him qualified to deliver honest, unambiguous guidance.

"No, education is not the key. Wealth is not it, nor is racial equity. It is spirit gifted with some degree of illumination, without which one cannot see which way to go. No, it is not IQ. It is Spirit."

Interesting premise, but wrong. The only difference between the first world and the third world is that the first world has the social and legal infrastructure required for the creation and protection of wealth. Without that social and legal infrastructure any nation becomes incapable of creating or preserving any wealth whatsoever.

If you have a "so-pe-ka" (buy me, give me, share me) society that says that what anyone else has should, by all rights, be mine, then you end up with Africa. If you have a mordita society that says that every cop has to pay for his job, and then he goes out and extorts his salary from every citizen he encounters, then you end up with Mexico.

It is only when the infrastructure required for the creation of wealth is put in place that the surplus of wealth known as the "first world" can become a reality. Without that infrastructure people are doomed to expending their efforts re-distributing wealth that already exists, with little hope of being able to create any new wealth whatsoever.

Just another hate-monger. </sarcasm>

...Interesting premise, but it is wrong... It is only when the infrastructure required for the creation of wealth is put in place that the surplus of wealth known as the "first world" can become a reality. Without that infrastructure people are doomed to expending their efforts re-distributing wealth that already exists, with little hope of being able to create any new wealth whatsoever.

I don't think Mr. McLittle is wrong at all. And I don't think you're wrong, as well, that a social and legal infrastructure is needed for the creation and protection of wealth. But at its very core, I strongly believe that the needed social and legal infrastructure is firmly rooted in "Spirit," as Mr. McLittle propounds. It is "Spirit" that has led civilization to understand the need for social and legal order; "Spirit" has led the way to where the "first world" is today.

The friction is eternal. The stakes are higher than ever. No more wooden clubs. Now comes the threat of atomic weapons. Prophets predicted their use. This is the time to know for sure, what side you are on.

And it is "Spirit" [by faith in the Holy Spirit] that assures me of which side I'm on.

Interesting premise, but wrong. The only difference between the first world and the third world is that the first world has the social and legal infrastructure required for the creation and protection of wealth.

YOu speak of this infrastructure as if it fell from the sky. Where has it come from? It comes from the choice and values of the people. Where people have strong preference for complacency and lack of personal initiative, you see tyrant come to power time and time again. In England, because of the deeply rooted respect to the individual freedoms, even the Inquisition failed to be established for almost two centuries (the total number of victims in the two centuries of existence is by a factor of 1000 smaller than those burned at the stake in Spain in a year).

People choose their institutions. And, even if the same institution is imposed on different peoples, it ends up functioning differently because of the divergence of persistent social values.

It is seldom asked: why is it that our constitution is known to the world for two centuries, and yet not a single country adopted anything similar? The French are on their Fifth Republic; in the last century, Germany and Italy were formed; there was an explosion in the number of new countries in 1940s-1960s on the African continent; just recently, the Russian Empire disintegrated into independent states. Not a single one has adopted our consitution. Has it not proved by now its value? Those to whom the value has been proven are flocking to our shores. And the rest? The rest prefer something else.

You speak of this infrastructure as if it fell from the sky. Where has it come from? It comes from the choice and values of the people.

I most certainly do not. A social and legal infrastructure is not just happenstance. It comes from the inner core of individuals for whom it exists. It's rooted in the hearts of man (as a whole). [...look, I'm not explaining myself very well, but I know what I'm trying to say...anyway, no big deal.]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.